BILL ANALYSIS Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair 733 (Leno) Hearing Date: 05/18/2009 Amended: 04/23/2009 Consultant: Jacqueline Wong-HernandezPolicy Vote: Public Safety 7-0 _________________________________________________________________ ____ BILL SUMMARY: This bill requires the Victims Compensation and Government Claims Board (VCGCB) to administer a grant program to create multi-disciplinary trauma recovery centers (TRC) that provide victims services in the areas of: mental health; community outreach; coordination among medical personnel, mental health care providers, law enforcement and social services. VCGCB would be authorized to award grants of up to $1,700,000 from the Restitution Fund, not to total more than $5,100,000. This bill makes legislative findings and declarations regarding the importance of providing treatment and services to crime victims. _________________________________________________________________ ____ Fiscal Impact (in thousands) Major Provisions 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 Fund Restitution Fund grants up to $5,100 up to $5,100 up to $5,100 Special* Program Administration Unknown, potentially significant costs Special* (VCGCB) *Restitution Fund _________________________________________________________________ ____ STAFF COMMENTS: This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File. This bill requires the VCGCB to administer a new grant program for trauma recovery centers. VCGCB would receive applications and award grants to centers of no more than $1,700,000 per center, and totaling no more than $5,100,000 each year. The board may award grants funding for up to three years. This bill has substantial costs, but to the degree that the trauma recovery centers receiving grants are successful, the state will likely have some cost savings. These cost savings will, however, be at least somewhat offset by the increased number of victims served under this program. The purpose of this bill is to replicate the successful model used in San Francisco General Hospital's Trauma Recovery Center (TRC). TRC was created in 2001 to develop and test a more cost-effective alternative model of care than the one usually used for victims in the state, TRC was developed in partnership with VCGCB. And funded from the Restitution Fund 2001-2005. In 2005, funding was vetoed by the governor, with a veto message explaining that he thought appropriating money specifically to San Francisco's TRC depleted Restitution Fund moneys intended for all victims in the state and jeopardized federal funding because TRC funds are "not being spent on direct victim reimbursement". San Francisco County ultimately continued funding TRC. Page 2 SB 733 (Leno) By all measures, TRC has been very successful at providing victim's services more cost effectively than individual reimbursements to victims for seeking their own mental health and medical services. In addition to the cost containment for each individual victim that occurs when TRC as the provider is paid by VCGCB because it seeks to serve as many people as possible, as opposed to a victim potentially incurring more expensive services elsewhere, TRC has served seven times as many victims in need of mental health services as the entire panel of San Francisco fee-for-service providers. TRC provides services more efficiently, and is able to reach more people (which often mitigates cost savings). If these services are needed, however, there may be additional long term savings by providing them to victims who would not seek them otherwise and would have a slower recovery period. Requiring VCGCB to administer a new grant program will increase existing workload, and it is unclear if new staff would be required. A Bureau of State Audits (BSA) report from December 2008 criticized the size of the VCGCB administration relative to services provided and the efficiency of reimbursement processing. The BSA report also criticized VCGCB outreach, contending that many victims are completely unaware of its existence and program. The LAO estimates that in 2006-07, VCGCB administrative costs accounted for $39,000,000 - about 31% of the annual funding for that year. It is possible that the VCGCB could absorb the administration and evaluation of this program within existing resources.