BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 757
                                                                  Page 1

          Date of Hearing:   June 16, 2009

           ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY AND TOXIC MATERIALS
                                Wesley Chesbro, Chair
                    SB 757 (Pavley) - As Amended:  April 30, 2009

           SENATE VOTE  :   21-13
           
          SUBJECT  :   Lead wheel weights.

           SUMMARY  :  Prohibits a person from manufacturing, selling, or  
          installing a wheel weight that contains more than 0.1 percent  
          lead by weight and provides that a person who violates this  
          prohibition is subject to injunction and civil and  
          administrative penalties.  Specifically,  this bill  :

          1)Prohibits a person from manufacturing, selling, or installing  
            a wheel weight that contains more than 0.1 percent lead by  
            weight.

          2)Provides that a person who violates or threatens to violate  
            the lead wheel weight prohibition (prohibition) may be  
            enjoined in any court of competent jurisdiction.

          3)Prohibits the subjection of a person who violates the  
            prohibition to criminal penalties; provides that a person who  
            violates the prohibition is liable for administrative or civil  
            penalties not to exceed two thousand five hundred dollars  
            ($2,500) per day for each violation.

             a)   Provides that the administrative or civil penalty may be  
               assessed and recovered in an administrative action filed by  
               the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) with the  
               Office of Administrative Hearings or in a civil action  
               brought in any court of competent jurisdiction.

             b)   Requires the presiding officer or the court, in  
               assessing the amount of an administrative or a civil  
               penalty for a violation of the prohibition, to consider a  
               specified list of criteria, including the nature, extent  
               and severity of the violation.

          4)Requires penalties collected for violations of this  
            prohibition to be deposited in the Hazardous Waste Control  
            Account (HWCA), for expenditure by DTSC, upon appropriation by  








                                                                  SB 757
                                                                  Page 2

            the Legislature, to implement and enforce the prohibition.

           EXISTING STATE LAW:

           1)Under the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of  
            1986 (Proposition 65):

             a)   Requires the Office of Environmental Health Hazard  
               Assessment (OEHHA) to publish a list of chemicals known to  
               cause cancer or birth defects or other reproductive harm.

             b)   Prohibits a person in the course of doing business from  
               knowingly discharging or releasing a chemical known to the  
               state to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity into water  
               or onto or into land where the chemical could contaminate  
               drinking water.

             c)   Prohibits a person in the course of doing business from  
               knowingly and intentionally exposing any individual to a  
               chemical known to the state to cause cancer or reproductive  
               toxicity without first giving clear and reasonable warning  
               to the individual.

             d)   Provides that a person that violates or threatens to  
               violate the provisions of Proposition 65 may be enjoined in  
               any court of competent jurisdiction.

             e)   Provides that a person who has violated the provisions  
               of Proposition 65 is liable for a civil penalty not to  
               exceed two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) per day  
               for each violation in addition to any other penalty  
               established by law.

             f)   Provides that, in assessing the amount of a civil  
               penalty for a violation of the provisions of Proposition  
               65, the court shall consider a list of criteria, including  
               the nature, extent and severity of the violation.

          2)Authorizes DTSC to take specified measures, similar to the  
            general provisions of Proposition 65, to enforce compliance  
            with prohibitions on lead in jewelry and prohibitions on  
            packaging containing regulated metals.

          3)Requires DTSC, by January 1, 2011, to adopt regulations to  
            establish a process to identify and prioritize chemicals in  








                                                                  SB 757
                                                                  Page 3

            consumer products that may be considered a "chemical of  
            concern," in accordance with a review process, as specified.

          4)Requires DTSC, on or before January 1, 2011, to adopt  
            regulations to establish a process to evaluate chemicals  
            concern, and their potential alternatives, in products in  
            order to determine how best to limit exposure to reduce the  
            level of hazard posed by a chemical of concern, as specified.

          5)Prohibits the sale of candy that is adulterated by lead; the  
            manufacture, sale and distribution of toys with levels of lead  
            paint in excess of the amount permitted by federal  
            regulations; the manufacture, shipping or sale of jewelry,  
            children's jewelry, or body piercing jewelry containing lead  
            above specified levels; the installation of leaded pipes and  
            the use of lead solder; the sale and distribution of tableware  
            containing lead above specified levels; the sale of glass  
            bottles with decorations containing lead in excess of  
            specified levels; and the manufacture and sale of water  
            coolers that are not lead free.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :   Unknown costs to DTSC to enforce the provisions  
          of the bill including costs for seeking administrative and civil  
          penalties.  These costs may be partially offset by penalties  
          collected and deposited in the HWCA.

           COMMENTS  :

           Purpose  :  According to the author's office, "In August 2008,  
          Chrysler, Perfect Equipment, Inc., Hennessey Industries and  
          Plombco Inc., which are all the lead wheel weight manufacturers  
          in California, agreed to phase-out lead wheel weights in  
          California by the end of 2009 as a result of a settlement of a  
          Proposition 65 enforcement lawsuit.  The agreement marks the  
          first-ever legally binding statewide rule phasing out lead wheel  
          weights in the United States?  SB 757 seeks to codify the 2008  
          lawsuit settlement as well as further insure that lead wheel  
          weights are not used in California by banning the sale and  
          installation of lead in wheel weights.  The 2008 lawsuit is  
          limited to the companies that agreed to the settlement and does  
          therefore not prevent any companies not enjoined in the  
          settlement from selling lead wheel weights in the state.  SB 757  
          seeks to insure state-wide compliance with regards to lead wheel  
          weights in order to fully insure that lead is no longer a toxic  
          in our drinking water and environment."








                                                                  SB 757
                                                                  Page 4


           Lead in wheel weights  .  According to the United States  
          Geological Survey (USGS), lead weights have been used to balance  
          wheels since the 1930s.  Out-of-balance tires tend to "cup" and  
          vibrate, cause excessive wear on tires and vehicle suspension  
          components and therefore result in compromised handling.  In  
          2003, approximately 65,000 tons of lead wheel weights were  
          estimated to be in use in the United States; approximately 2,000  
          tons of lead wheel weights were lost on the nation's roadways  
          that same year.

          According to a study in Environmental Health Perspectives, lead  
          weights are lost and deposited on urban streets, accumulate  
          along the outer curb, and rapidly abrade and ground into tiny  
          pieces by vehicle traffic.  This lead loading of urban streets  
          by motor vehicle wheel weights is continuous, significant, and  
          widespread, and is potentially a major source of human lead  
          exposure.  The United States Environmental Protection Agency (US  
          EPA) also recognizes that lead-based wheel weights that have  
          fallen from vehicles and lead weights that do not enter the  
          recycling stream may be potential contributors of lead to the  
          environment.

           Lead:  a recognized hazard.   Lead has been listed under  
          California's Proposition 65 since 1987 as a substance that can  
          cause reproductive damage and birth defects and has been on the  
          list of chemicals known to cause cancer since 1992.  According  
          to DTSC, an extensive body of medical observation and scientific  
          research has revealed additional toxic effects associated with  
          lead exposure such as adverse effects on the neurological,  
          hematopoietic, renal, cardiovascular and gastrointestinal  
          systems.  Childhood exposure to lead is associated with  
          decreased intelligence; reduced short-term memory; reading  
          disabilities; and deficits in vocabulary, fine motor skills,  
          reaction time, and hand-eye coordination.

          According to the Center for Environmental Health, about  
          two-thirds of the lead in California highway runoff comes from  
          lead wheel weights.

           Codifying a settlement  :  The author notes that this bill seeks  
          to codify a settlement in a case against lead wheel weight  
          manufacturers under the provisions of Proposition 65.  The Los  
          Angeles Times, in an August 21, 2008, article entitled "Lead  
          wheel weights to be phased out in California by end of 2009"  








                                                                  SB 757
                                                                  Page 5

          reported:



            "Lead wheel weights, widely used to balance vehicle tires and  
            considered a threat to drinking water, will be phased out in  
            California by the end of next year under a court settlement  
            approved today? The settlement? ends a lawsuit filed in May by  
            the Oakland-based Center for Environmental Health against  
            Chrysler and the three largest makers of lead wheel weights  
            for the U.S. market.  Some observers see the settlement as a  
            first step toward a broader ban on the products?  Under the  
            settlement, Chrysler will end the use of factory-installed  
            lead wheel weights in vehicles sold in California by July 31,  
            2009.  In addition, wheel-weight producer Plombco Inc. of  
            Canada will end shipments of lead wheel weights to California  
            by the end of this year.  Producers Perfect Equipment Inc. and  
            Hennessey Industries, both based in LaVergne, Tenn., will stop  
            shipments to California by the end of 2009."

           California's Green Chemistry Initiative  :  In 2007, DTSC  
          commenced developing the California Green Chemistry Initiative,  
          and in December, 2008, it released six policy recommendations  
          for establishing a comprehensive Green Chemistry program in  
          California.  Last year, the Governor signed AB 1879 and SB 509  
          into law, which enacted two of the six recommendations.  AB 1879  
          (Feuer and Huffman) Chapter 559, Statutes of 2008, requires DTSC  
          to adopt regulations by January 1, 2011 to identify and  
          prioritize chemicals of concern, to evaluate alternatives, and  
          to specify regulatory responses where chemicals of concern are  
          found in consumer products.  SB 509 (Simitian) Chapter 560,  
          Statutes of 2008, requires DTSC to establish an online, public  
          Toxics Information Clearinghouse that includes science-based  
          information on the toxicity and hazard traits of chemicals used  
          in daily life.  Products such as wheel weights could be  
          considered through this program.

           Current voluntary action  .  The Alliance of Automobile  
          Manufacturers notes that the bill is unnecessary because the  
          eleven Alliance car manufacturers have voluntarily eliminated  
          the use of lead wheel weights; the US EPA has in place a  
          voluntary program to replace lead wheel weights after market;  
          and the California Green Chemistry Initiative is the appropriate  
          way to evaluate the use of chemicals in California.  Supporters  
          of the bill note that while domestic manufacturers are making  








                                                                  SB 757
                                                                  Page 6

          strides toward eliminating the use of lead, foreign  
          manufacturers and importers of wheel weights are not currently  
          required or incentivised to do the same.  
           
           Alternatives to lead in wheel weights  .  According to the USGS,  
          as of July 1, 2005, lead wheel weights were banned on new  
          vehicles and on after-market wheels in Europe in response to  
          environmental concerns about losses along roadways and  
          inappropriate disposal by tire retailers and scrap processors.   
          European-manufactured vehicles are using steel, zinc, and other  
          metals as a substitute for lead in wheel weights.  American  
          manufacturers are also producing zinc weights as a replacement  
          for lead weights.

          While it appears that alternatives to lead wheel weights exist,  
          the bill does not require an alternatives analysis or other  
          means by which to ensure that replacements for lead in wheel  
          weights are less harmful to public health or the environment.   
          Therefore, alternatives could prove to be equally or more  
          harmful to human health and the environment.  Because of this,  
          the Committee may wish to consider requiring that alternatives  
          to lead in wheel weights are assessed to ensure that  
          alternatives are no more toxic to human health and the  
          environment than current wheel weights.

           Double referral  :  This bill is double referred to the Assembly  
          Judiciary Committee.

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :

           Support

           Center for Environmental Health (co- sponsor)
          Clean Water Action (co- sponsor)
          American Federation of State, County Municipal Employees  
          (AFSCME)
          Consumers Union
          East Bay Municipal Utility District
          Environmental Working Group
          Perfect Equipment, Inc.
          Planning and Conservation League
          Sierra Club California
          Worksafe

           Opposition








                                                                 SB 757
                                                                  Page 7

           
          None on file.


           Analysis Prepared by :    Shannon McKinney / E.S. & T.M. / (916)  
          319-3965