BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 783
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   June 29, 2009

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION
                                   Mike Eng, Chair
                    SB 783 (Ashburn) - As Amended:  June 23, 2009

           SENATE VOTE :  38-0
           
          SUBJECT  :  California High-Speed Rail Passenger:  Biennial  
          Business Plan

           SUMMARY  :  Revises the contents of the business plan of the  
          California High-Speed Rail Authority (HSRA) and requires it to  
          prepare, publish, and adopt it on a continuing basis, starting  
          on January 1, 2012, and every two years thereafter.   
          Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Revises the contents of the HSRA business plan and requires  
            HSRA to prepare a draft business plan and submit it for public  
            review and comment 60 days prior to publication.  

          2)Requires that the draft business plan also be submitted to the  
            transportation committees of the Legislature.  

          3)Requires HSRA to adopt the final plan and submit it to the  
            Legislature by January 1, 2012, and every two years  
            thereafter.  

          4)Requires that the business plan include the following  
            additional information:  

             a)   The most recent patronage forecast to identify high,  
               medium, and low ridership scenarios and the corresponding  
               levels of service for Phase I of the project;  

             b)   Alternative financial pro formas based on the patronage  
               forecast for each level of service, and the operating  
               break-even points for each alternative without operating  
               subsidies;  

             c)   The expected schedule for completion of environmental  
               review, and initiation and completion of each segment of  
               Phase 1;  

             d)   The supplemental sources of any federal, state, and  








                                                                  SB 783
                                                                  Page  2

               local funding that is available to augment bond funds, and  
               the level of confidence for obtaining each type of funding;  
                

             e)   Any written agreements with public or private entities  
               to fund components of the high-speed rail stations and  
               terminals; and,  

             f)   Alternative public-private development strategies for   
               implementing Phase I.  

           EXISTING LAW  :  

          1)Enacts the Safe, Reliable High-Speed Passenger Train Bond Act  
            for the 21st Century (High-Speed Rail Bond Act).  The  
            High-Speed Rail Bond Act, approved as Proposition 1A in  
            November 2008, provides $9.95 billion in general obligation  
            bond authority to fund the planning and construction of a  
            high-speed passenger train system and complementary  
            improvements to other specified rail systems in the state.  

          2)Requires HSRA to prepare a business plan by September 1, 2008,  
            that includes the types of services it expects to develop, a  
            description of the system's benefits, a patronage forecast,  
            the sources of funds to construct and operate the project, the  
            chronology for construction of the corridors in which it will  
            operate, the risk associated with construction, technology,  
            financing and other aspects of the project, and the HSRA's  
            strategy for managing risks.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Senate Appropriations  
          Committee, costs, after the initial business plan revisions  
          pursuant to Senate Budget Bill Language, approximately $100,000  
          - $150,000, that would be provided by California High-Speed  
          Passenger Train Bond Funds.  

           COMMENTS  :  The author's office states that this bill implements  
          the recommendations of the Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO)  
          concerning the business plan for the California high-speed rail  
          passenger project as submitted by HSRA.  In its review of the  
          HSRA budget request for the 2009-10 fiscal year, LAO summarized  
          inadequacies it found in the HSRA's November business plan.  It  
          indicated that "Lacking detailed information such as this, the  
          Legislature really has no better sense than prior to the plan's  
          submission as to how HSRA plans to accomplish its objective.  As  








                                                                  SB 783
                                                                  Page  3

          the HSRA continues to develop the high-speed rail system, it is  
          essential that the Legislature have a clear understanding of how  
          the state is proceeding with the project and, most importantly,  
          the risks it may be assuming and how those risks would be  
          mitigated.  So that the Legislature will have the necessary  
          information, we recommend that the Legislature require HSRA to  
          expand upon its business plan and submit information to include  
          specific elements missing from the original document before  
          appropriating any bond funding for 2009-10.  Although it is  
          likely that there will be an appropriation of bond revenue for  
          continuing the environmental and preliminary engineering work  
          that is already underway, the HSRA will not be seeking funding  
          for a construction project for the 2009-10 fiscal year."  

           HSRA Business Plan  :  Current law, pursuant to the High-Speed  
          Rail Bond Act, required HSRA to prepare a business plan and  
          submit the report to the Legislature by September 1, 2008.  The  
          law specifies the contents of the business plan, included  
          information on the types of services HSRA expects to develop, a  
          description of the system's benefits, a patronage forecast, the  
          sources of funds to construct and operate the project, the  
          chronology for construction of the corridors in which it will  
          operate, the risks associated with construction, technology,  
          financing and other aspects of the project, and the HSRA's  
          strategy for managing risks.  The business plan, as required to  
          be submitted on a one-time basis, was submitted late to the  
          Legislature in November 2008, beyond the date for statewide  
          voters to benefit from reading its content in consideration of  
          their vote on the High-Speed Rail Bond Act.  

           Senate Budget Bill Language  :  Separately, as a part of the state  
          budget conference compromise for high-speed rail, the conference  
          committee proposed to adopt the full funding level for HSRA as  
          requested by the Administration ($139 million from Proposition  
          1A bond funds), along with adopting Senate budget bill language  
          that requires HSRA to submit a revised business plan to the  
          Joint Legislative Budget Committee by December 15, 2009.  The  
          revised business plan is to include additional information  
          similar to that requested by this bill.  

           Related bill  :  SB 455 (Lowenthal) of 2009, among other  
          provisions, requires the creation of an overall project schedule  
          with project delivery milestones for all aspects of the  
          high-speed rail project and the identification of the elements  
          of the project schedule that are critical.  Also, requires the  








                                                                  SB 783
                                                                  Page  4

          submittal of quarterly reports to the Legislature and the  
          Legislative Analyst's Office.  That bill is being heard in this  
          committee today.  

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :

           Support 
           
          None on file

           Opposition 
           
          None on file

           
          Analysis Prepared by  :   Ed Imai / TRANS. / (916) 319-2093