BILL ANALYSIS SB 879 Page 1 Date of Hearing: August 4, 2010 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Felipe Fuentes, Chair SB 879 (Cox) - As Amended: August 2, 2010 Policy Committee: Local GovernmentVote:6-3 Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: No Reimbursable: SUMMARY This bill extends the sunset for the use of design-build by counties from January 1, 2011, to July 1, 2014, and aligns the design-build statutes for cities and counties. The bill also: 1)Requires the design-build standard questionnaire currently issued by cities or counties to state that the entity submitting bids must divulge instances where a court has found it to have submitted any claim in violation of the federal False Claims Act or the state False Claims Act within the previous five years. 2)Requires cities and counties to make available to the public lists of subcontractors, bidders, and bid awards for design-build projects. 3)Requires each county that uses the design-build method on a public works project to submit to the Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO) before September 1, 2013, a report containing specified information related to each public works project procured through the design-build process and completed between November 1, 2009 and August 1, 2013. 4)Requires the LAO, by January 1, 2014, to prepare a report to the Legislature on the use of design-build at the county level. Requires that the LAO develop information for the report based on specified information provided by the counties as well as its own review of all available public records, media reports, and other sources. The report is required to include conclusions regarding the actual cost of projects SB 879 Page 2 procured pursuant to this section, whether the project schedule was met or altered, and the use of change orders. FISCAL EFFECT 1)Significant costs to LAO, likely more than $150,000, to conduct detailed review and analysis of all public documents associated with each design-build projects used by counties, and to solicit other information from counties required for its report. 2)Minor and absorbable costs to the Department of Industrial Relations, which is responsible for enforcing prevailing wage and related labor compliance programs associated with design-build contracts. 3)Potential fiscal benefits to counties, to the extent that use of design - build contracting results in faster project and/or greater certainty about costs. COMMENTS 1)Rationale. The bill is intended to reduce costs and expedite delivery of county infrastructure projects. Supporters (including the California State Association of Counties and saved the Regional Council of Rural Counties) claim that the design build construction method has local agencies hundreds of millions of dollars on projects over the past decade, and that counties have plans to use the design build method for delivery of numerous more projects over the next several years. 2)Background . The local Agency Public Construction Act requires local agencies to comply with certain procedures in soliciting and evaluating bids and awarding contracts for the construction of public works. The traditional approach to public contracting is referred to as the design-bid-build method, which requires local officials to invite bids for construction projects, based on a completed set of engineering plans, then to award the construction bid to the lowest responsible bidder. An alternative approach is the design-build method, where both the design and construction are procured from the same entity. The state has enacted numerous bills over the past decade SB 879 Page 3 expanding authority for local governments to use this alternative process. For example, SB 416 (Ashburn), Chapter 585, Statutes 2007, extended design-build authority to the construction of buildings and directly related improvements to all 58 counties in the state through 2010. AB 642 (Wolk), Chapter 314, Statues 2008, extended design-build authority to the construction of buildings and directly related improvements to all cities in the state. SB 1699 (Wiggins), Chapter 415, Statutes 2008, extended design-build authority to the construction of buildings and improvements in excess of $2.5 million directly related to a Sonoma Valley Health Care District hospital or health facility building. The 2009-10 budget package expanded design-build authorization at the state level for (a) five state facilities within the jurisdiction of Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, the Department of General Services and the Judicial Council; (b) 10 redevelopment agency projects in excess of $1 million; (c) five local transportation projects (regional transportation agencies or transportation projects); and, (d) 10 state transportation projects. As a result of these and related changes, design-build contracting for building and related construction is currently authorized for all cities and counties in the state, and more targeted authorizations exist for other agencies of state and local government. In January of 2009 the LAO issued a report updating the Legislature on the use of design-build by counties in California, based on data received from counties who utilized this methodology. In the report, LAO states that "although it was difficult to draw conclusions from the reports received about the effectiveness of design-build compared to other project delivery methods, we do not think that the reports provide any evidence that would discourage the Legislature from granting design-build authority to local agencies on an ongoing basis. In doing so, however, we recommend the Legislature consider some changes such as creating uniform design-build statute, eliminating cost limitations, and requiring project cost to be a larger factor in awarding the design-build contract." Analysis Prepared by : Brad Williams / APPR. / (916) 319-2081