BILL ANALYSIS SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE Senator Ellen M. Corbett, Chair 2009-2010 Regular Session SB 962 (Liu) As Amended March 11, 2010 Hearing Date: April 13, 2010 Fiscal: Yes Urgency: No KB:jd SUBJECT Prisoners: Adjudication of Parental Rights: Participation DESCRIPTION This bill would, among other things, allow for the use of video or teleconference technology for prisoners to participate in judicial proceedings involving their parental rights or a dependency petition for their child under Welfare and Institutions Code Section 300. BACKGROUND Over the past eight years the California Research Bureau has issued a series of reports focusing on California law as it relates to the lives of incarcerated prisoners and their children. (See Children of Incarcerated Parents, Charlene Wear Simmons, CRB Note Vol. 7, No. 2, March 2000; Children of Arrested Parents: Strategies to Improve Their Safety and Well-Being, Clare M. Nolan, CRB 03-011, July 2003; California State Prisoners With Children: Findings from the 1997 Survey of Inmates in State and Federal Correctional Facilities, M. Anne Powell, M.S.W., CRB 03-014, November 2003.) The reports have highlighted the state's lack of clear policies and laws on how criminal justice authorities, as well as the child welfare system, should respond to circumstances and issues raised by incarcerated parents and their children. As explained in the reports, there are profound social, mental, and health implications for children whose parents are incarcerated. These problems have become even more pressing as the state's prison population, particularly the female population, continues to increase dramatically. (more) SB 962 (Liu) Page 2 of ? This bill seeks to address one aspect of the problems that exist for incarcerated parents and their children, particularly those who end up the subject of dependency proceedings. Specifically, in order to facilitate participation by incarcerated parents in judicial proceedings involving dependency petitions for their children or their parental rights, this bill would allow for participation via video or teleconferencing in specified circumstances. This bill was approved by the Senate Public Safety Committee on March 23, 2010 by a vote of 7-0. CHANGES TO EXISTING LAW Existing law provides that, where a judicial proceeding concerns the termination of the parental rights of any prisoner, or the dependency proceeding involving a prisoner's child, the superior court of the county in which the proceeding is pending, or a judge thereof, shall order notice of any court proceeding regarding the proceeding transmitted to the prisoner, as specified. (Pen. Code Sec. 2625.) Existing law further requires the temporary removal of a prisoner from an institution for the prisoner's production before the court where a prisoner has advised the court of his or her desire to be present, as specified. (Pen. Code Sec. 2625.) Existing law provides that no proceeding (terminating parental rights or dependency adjudication) may be held without the physical presence of the prisoner or the prisoner's attorney, unless the court has before it a knowing waiver of the right of physical presence signed by the prisoner or an affidavit signed by the warden, superintendent, or other person in charge of the institution, or his or her designated representative stating that the prisoner has, by express statement or action, indicated an intent not to appear at the proceeding. (Pen. Code Sec. 2625.) This bill would provide that a prisoner who is a parent of a child involved in a dependency hearing and who has either waived his or her right to physical presence at the hearing, or who has not been ordered before the court may, at the court's discretion, in order to facilitate the parent's participation, be given the opportunity to participate in the hearing by videoconference, if that technology is available, and if that SB 962 (Liu) Page 3 of ? participation otherwise complies with the law. If videoconferencing technology is not available, this bill would provide that teleconferencing may be utilized to facilitate parental participation. This bill would state that, because of the significance of dependency court hearings for parental rights and children's long-term care, physical attendance by the parent at the hearings is preferred to participation by videoconference or teleconference. This bill would provide that it does not authorize the use of videoconference or teleconference to replace in-person family visits with prisoners. This bill would provide that a prisoner subject to this section shall not lose internal job placement opportunities, be removed from a court-ordered course, or be denied any earned privileges as a result of his or her participation in the proceedings described in this section, whether in person or by videoconference or teleconference, unless the prisoner is absent from the institution for this purpose for more than 10 days. This bill additionally would authorize the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to establish a pilot project to facilitate the participation of incarcerated parents in dependency court hearings regarding their children. This bill would provide that the costs of the pilot project shall be funded with private funds and shall be implemented only after a determination is made by the Department of Finance that private donations, sufficient to fully support the activities of the project, have been deposited with the state. COMMENT 1. Stated need for the bill The author states: A substantial majority of Californians in the criminal justice system are parents. The California Research Bureau estimates that 67% of male inmates are fathers and 79% of female inmates are mothers (2000). Over the last 15 years, an increasing number of adults have been incarcerated under the state's more strict criminal sentencing policies. As a consequence, the SB 962 (Liu) Page 4 of ? number of children whose parents are in prison has grown. These children often enter and remain in the child welfare system because logistical issues prevent incarcerated parents from maintaining their parental rights, irrespective of their parenting practices. Incarcerated parents often waive physical appearance at a hearing, not because they are unwilling to be present and participate, but because attending may result in the loss of good time credits or rehabilitation program eligibility. Often these are the very credits or program participation required by the family reunification case plan (Family and Juvenile Law Advisory Committee). If a parent elects to attend a dependency hearing in person, hearing and travel time can take up to 10 days, greatly damaging the parent's ability to fulfill the family reunification requirements ? . ? In the wake of fiscal distress, counties in other states have already begun utilizing video-conferencing for inmates as a cost-saving measure ? SB 962 seeks to prevent unnecessary termination of parental rights by allowing for a cost-savings solution. 2.This bill would allow for the use of video-conferencing for incarcerated parents to participate in dependency proceedings Pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code Section 300(g), children of incarcerated parents may fall within the juvenile court's jurisdiction if a parent cannot arrange for the child's care. The courts have interpreted "incarcerated" in Section 300 as meaning "jailed," which would include a parent who has been arrested and charged, but not yet convicted. (See Edgar O. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, (2000) 84 Cal.App.4th 13.) A significant number of the children of incarcerated parents become dependents of the juvenile court, and are placed in foster care because parents do not have friends or relatives who can care for their children. Once a child is involved in dependency proceedings in the juvenile court, there is a strict process and timeframe prescribed by federal and state law, with the ultimate goal to establish a permanent home for the child. The state must petition to terminate parental rights of any child over age six who has been in foster care 15 of the last 18 months (or 12 months for younger children), unless a relative is caring for the child or termination would not be in the best interests of SB 962 (Liu) Page 5 of ? the child. (Wel. & Inst. Code Secs. 361.5, 366.26; Adoption and Safe Families Act (ASFA) (P.L. 105-89).) Penal Code Section 2625 expressly gives incarcerated parents the right to be present at a court hearing involving the termination of parental rights. However, as noted by the author, there are a number of barriers that may prevent an incarcerated parent from choosing to physically attend a hearing. This bill would allow for the use of video or teleconference technology for prisoners to participate in judicial proceedings involving their parental rights or a dependency petition for their child under Welfare and Institutions Code Section 300. Specifically, this bill would, at the court's discretion, allow for participation via video or teleconferencing, subject to availability of that technology, and if the participation otherwise complies with the law. A prisoner would have to waive his or her right to physical presence at the hearing. However, the bill states that because of the significance of dependency court proceedings for parental rights and children's long-term care, physical attendance by the parent at the hearings is preferred to participation by video or teleconference. Further, this bill would provide that prisoners shall not lose internal job placement opportunities, be removed from a court-ordered course, or be denied any earned privileges as a result of his or her participation in these proceedings, whether in person or by videoconference or teleconference, unless the prisoner is absent from the institution for this purpose for more than 10 days. Finally, this bill would authorize the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to establish a pilot project to facilitate the participation of incarcerated parents in dependency court hearings regarding their children, to be funded privately, as specified. Once the appeals timeframe or process has expired, termination of parental rights is irreversible, and completely severs a parent's legal rights and relationship with his or her child. As noted in a recent report by the National Conference of State Legislatures, "[a]lthough inmate parents are vulnerable to losing parental rights, they often are unaware of this vulnerability or know very little about what they can do to prevent loss of rights. Even if they understand what is at stake, administrative and logistical factors can prevent them from attending critical court hearings. Key to addressing these issues is ensuring that inmate parents are consistently SB 962 (Liu) Page 6 of ? represented by attorneys who are familiar not only with dependency litigation, but also with the criminal justice system and applicable corrections policies that affect incarcerated parents. Addressing this problem also will require improved coordination among law enforcement, the judiciary, corrections and child welfare." (Children of Incarcerated Parents, p. 1, Steve Christian, National Conference of State Legislatures, March 2009)(footnote omitted), available at http://www.ncsl.org/documents/cyf/childrenofincarceratedparents.p df.) This bill would arguably advance the goals articulated above by providing incarcerated parents with more options for meaningful participation in dependency proceedings involving their children and those where their parental rights are at stake. 3. Suggested Amendment The purpose of this bill is to remove barriers for incarcerated parents to participation in dependency hearings in order to promote family reunification and to decrease the number of children in the child welfare system. It is important to note that this bill does not authorize the use of video or teleconference as a substitute to replace in-person family visits with the prisoner. This bill also emphasizes that physical attendance at hearings is preferred to participation by video or teleconferencing. Thus, this bill is not intended to erode the right of incarcerated parents to participate in dependency hearings in person or create a precedent where videoconferencing is the standard form of participation. During the Senate Public Safety Committee's hearing on this bill, several committee members requested an amendment clarifying that this bill would not limit a parent's rights to physically attend dependency hearings. Committee staff notes that such a clarification would be consistent with both the bill's goals and current law. The author agreed to make this clarifying amendment, which would be as follows: On page 5, line 25, after the period, insert: "(i) Nothing in this bill shall be construed to limit a prisoner's right to physically attend a dependency hearing described in this section." On page 5, line 27 strike "(i)" and insert "(j)" SB 962 (Liu) Page 7 of ? Support : California Public Defenders Association; County Welfare Directors Association; Family Law Section of the State Bar; SEIU Local 1000; Taxpayers for Improving Public Safety Opposition : None Known HISTORY Source : Los Angeles Dependency Lawyers; Friends Outside Related Pending Legislation : None Known Prior Legislation : None Known Prior Vote : Senate Public Safety Committee (Ayes 7, Noes 0) **************