BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    


          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 962|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
                              UNFINISHED BUSINESS

          Bill No:  SB 962
          Author:   Liu (D)
          Amended:  8/2/10
          Vote:     21

           SENATE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE  :  7-0, 3/23/10
          AYES:  Leno, Cogdill, Cedillo, Hancock, Huff, Steinberg,  

           SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE  :  4-0, 4/13/10
          AYES:  Corbett, Hancock, Leno, Walters
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Harman

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  9-0, 5/3/10
          AYES:  Kehoe, Cox, Corbett, Leno, Price, Walters, Wolk,  
            Wyland, Yee
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Alquist, Denham

           SENATE FLOOR  :  30-0, 5/10/10 (Consent)
          AYES:  Aanestad, Alquist, Ashburn, Calderon, Cedillo,  
            Cogdill, Correa, Cox, DeSaulnier, Ducheny, Florez,  
            Hancock, Hollingsworth, Huff, Kehoe, Leno, Lowenthal,  
            Negrete McLeod, Padilla, Pavley, Price, Romero, Runner,  
            Simitian, Steinberg, Walters, Wolk, Wright, Wyland, Yee
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Corbett, Denham, Dutton, Harman, Liu,  
            Oropeza, Strickland, Wiggins

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  78-0, 8/12/10 (Consent) - See last page  
            for vote

           SUBJECT  :    Prisoners:  adjudication of parental rights:   


                                                                SB 962


           SOURCE  :     Los Angeles Dependency Lawyers
                      Friends Outside

           DIGEST  :    This bill allows for the use of video or  
          teleconference technology for prisoners to participate in  
          judicial proceedings involving their parental rights or a  
          dependency petition for their child.

           Assembly Amendments  (1) provide that this is not a "pilot  
          program" rather a program at an institution to be  
          determined, (2) delete a required report, and (3) add  
          intent language.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law provides that, where a judicial  
          proceeding concerns the termination of the parental rights  
          of any prisoner, or the dependency proceeding involving a  
          prisoner's child, the superior court of the county in which  
          the proceeding is pending, or a judge thereof, shall order  
          notice of any court proceeding regarding the proceeding  
          transmitted to the prisoner, as specified.  (Pen. Code Sec.  

          Existing law further requires the temporary removal of a  
          prisoner from an institution for the prisoner's production  
          before the court where a prisoner has advised the court of  
          his or her desire to be present, as specified.  (Pen. Code  
          Sec. 2625.)

          Existing law provides that no proceeding (terminating  
          parental rights or dependency adjudication) may be held  
          without the physical presence of the prisoner or the  
          prisoner's attorney, unless the court has before it a  
          knowing waiver of the right of physical presence signed by  
          the prisoner or an affidavit signed by the warden,  
          superintendent, or other person in charge of the  
          institution, or his or her designated representative  
          stating that the prisoner has, by express statement or  
          action, indicated an intent not to appear at the  
          proceeding.  (Pen. Code Sec.  2625.)

          This bill provides that a prisoner who is a parent of a  


                                                                SB 962

          child involved in a dependency hearing and who has either  
          waived his or her right to physical presence at the  
          hearing, or who has not been ordered before the court may,  
          at the court's discretion, in order to facilitate the  
          parent's participation, be given the opportunity to  
          participate in the hearing by videoconference, if that  
          technology is available, and if that participation  
          otherwise complies with the law.  If videoconferencing  
          technology is not available, this bill would provide that  
          teleconferencing may be utilized to facilitate parental  
          participation.  The bill specifies that these provisions  
          are not to be construed to limit a prisoner's right to  
          physically attend a dependency hearing.

          This bill states that, because of the significance of  
          dependency court hearings for parental rights and  
          children's long-term care, physical attendance by the  
          parent at the hearings is preferred to participation by  
          videoconference or teleconference.  

          This bill provides that it does not authorize the use of  
          videoconference or teleconference to replace in-person  
          family visits with prisoners.

          This bill states that it is the intent of the Legislature  
          to maintain internal job placement opportunities and  
          preserve earned privileges for prisoners, and prevent the  
          removal of prisoners from court-ordered courses as a result  
          of their participation in the proceedings described in this  

          This bill authorizes the Department of Corrections and  
          Rehabilitation to accept donated materials and services  
          related to videoconferencing and teleconferencing in order  
          to implement a program, at a prison to be determined by the  
          department, to facilitate the participation of incarcerated  
          parents in dependency court hearings regarding their  

          This bill provides that the implementation of this program  
          is contingent upon the receipt of sufficient donations of  
          materials and services by the department.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    


                                                                SB 962

          Local:  No

                          Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions                     2010-11               
           2011-12      2012-13        Fund  
          Authorizes CDCR pilot project                Unknown,  
          possibly significant                         Private
                                   Likely minor custody costs, if  
          implemented        General
          Inmate transportation                                   
          Potentially significant savings                              

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/12/10)

          Los Angeles Dependency Lawyers (co-source) 
          Friends Outside (co-source) 
          California Public Defenders Association
          County Welfare Directors Association
          Family Law Section of the State Bar
          SEIU Local 1000
          Taxpayers for Improving Public Safety

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the author's office: 

               A substantial majority of Californians in the criminal  
               justice system are parents.  The California Research  
               Bureau estimates that 67% of male inmates are fathers  
               and 79% of female inmates are mothers (2000).  Over  
               the last 15 years, an increasing number of adults have  
               been incarcerated under the state's more strict  
               criminal sentencing policies.  As a consequence, the  
               number of children whose parents are in prison has  

               These children often enter and remain in the child  
               welfare system because logistical issues prevent  
               incarcerated parents from maintaining their parental  
               rights, irrespective of their parenting practices.   
               Incarcerated parents often waive physical appearance  
               at a hearing, not because they are unwilling to be  
               present and participate, but because attending may  


                                                                SB 962

               result in the loss of good time credits or  
               rehabilitation program eligibility.  Often these are  
               the very credits or program participation required by  
               the family reunification case plan (Family and  
               Juvenile Law Advisory Committee).  If a parent elects  
               to attend a dependency hearing in person, hearing and  
               travel time can take up to 10 days, greatly damaging  
               the parent's ability to fulfill the family  
               reunification requirements ?.

               ? In the wake of fiscal distress, counties in other  
               states have already begun utilizing video-conferencing  
               for inmates as a cost-saving measure ? SB 962 seeks to  
               prevent unnecessary termination of parental rights by  
               allowing for a cost-savings solution.  

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  
          AYES:  Adams, Ammiano, Anderson, Arambula, Bass, Beall,  
            Bill Berryhill, Tom Berryhill, Blakeslee, Block,  
            Blumenfield, Bradford, Brownley, Buchanan, Caballero,  
            Charles Calderon, Carter, Chesbro, Conway, Cook, Coto,  
            Davis, De La Torre, De Leon, DeVore, Eng, Evans, Feuer,  
            Fletcher, Fong, Fuentes, Fuller, Furutani, Gaines,  
            Galgiani, Garrick, Gatto, Gilmore, Hagman, Hall, Harkey,  
            Hayashi, Hernandez, Hill, Huber, Huffman, Jeffries,  
            Jones, Knight, Lieu, Logue, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma,  
            Mendoza, Miller, Monning, Nava, Nestande, Niello,  
            Nielsen, V. Manuel Perez, Portantino, Ruskin, Salas,  
            Saldana, Silva, Skinner, Smyth, Solorio, Audra  
            Strickland, Swanson, Torlakson, Torres, Torrico, Tran,  
            Villines, Yamada, John A. Perez
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Norby, Vacancy

          RJG:nl  8/16/10   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****