BILL ANALYSIS ------------------------------------------------------------ |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 993| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |1020 N Street, Suite 524 | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ------------------------------------------------------------ THIRD READING Bill No: SB 993 Author: Huff (R) Amended: As introduced Vote: 21 SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMMITTEE : 8-0, 3/23/10 AYES: Lowenthal, Huff, Ashburn, DeSaulnier, Kehoe, Oropeza, Pavley, Simitian NO VOTE RECORDED: Harman SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : 10-0, 5/27/10 AYES: Alquist, Corbett, Denham, Kehoe, Leno, Price, Walters, Wolk, Wyland, Yee NO VOTE RECORDED: Cox SUBJECT : State highway relinquishment SOURCE : Author DIGEST : This bill authorizes the relinquishment of a segment of State Route 66, locally known as Foothill Boulevard, to the City of Claremont. ANALYSIS : Existing law 1. Identifies the California state highway system through a description of segments of the state's regional and CONTINUED SB 993 Page 2 interregional roads that are owned and operated by the Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2. Defines a "state highway" as any roadway that is acquired, laid out, constructed, improved, or maintained as a state highway according to legislative authorization. 3. Specifies that it is the intent of the Legislature for the routes of the state highway system to connect the communities and regions of the state and that they serve the state's economy by connecting centers of commerce, industry, agriculture, mineral wealth, and recreation. 4. Provides that any expansion or deletion of the state highway system occurs through a statutory process requiring the California Transportation Commission (CTC) to make findings that it is in the best interest of the state to include or delete a specified portion of roadway from the system. This bill: 1. Authorizes the CTC to relinquish to the City of Claremont the segment of State Route (SR) 66 located in the city, upon terms and conditions the CTC finds to be in the best interest of the state. 2. Requires the City of Claremont to provide signage indicating the continuation of SR 66 through the city. 3. Requires the City of Claremont to ensure that traffic flows are maintained on the relinquished segment through the use of traffic signal synchronization and other means. 4. Provides that the relinquishment will become effective immediately following the county recordation of the relinquishment resolutions containing the CTC's approval of the specified terms and conditions. 5. Specifies that following the effective date of relinquishment, the relinquished segment will no longer be a state highway and may not be considered for future SB 993 Page 3 adoption as a state highway. Background SR 66, known locally as Foothill Boulevard, traverses the City of Claremont from its boundary on the east with Fontana to its boundary on the west with Pomona. The road is within the City of Claremont's redevelopment area and relinquishment of SR 66 to the city will ensure that it is redevelopment plans for SR 66 will incorporate the city's desires for landscaping, street furniture, and other design elements involving the road. The City of Claremont has been in negotiations with the Caltrans for nearly a decade, relating to the relinquishment of SR 66. According to the author, Caltrans and the City of Claremont now agree that relinquishment is beneficial to both the state and the city. Caltrans concurs with that conclusion. The relinquishment authorized by this bill is a continuation of the earlier relinquishments. For example, SB 1366 (Negrete Mcloud), Chapter 717, Statutes of 2008 authorized the relinquishment to the City of Rialto a segment of SR 66 in that city. Similarly, SB 857 (Soto) Chapter 251, Statutes of 2002 authorized the CTC t FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: No According to the Senate Appropriations Committee analysis: Fiscal Impact (in thousands) Major Provisions 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 Fund Caltrans improvements unknown one-time costs (minor to Special* $2,000) prior to relinquishment Caltrans maintenance Unknown long-term savings Special* and repair following relinquishment SB 993 Page 4 CTC administration minor costs to administer Special* agreements *State Highway Account SUPPORT : (Verified 5/27/10) City of Claremont JJA:do 5/27/10 Senate Floor Analyses SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE **** END ****