BILL ANALYSIS SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE Senator Ellen M. Corbett, Chair 2009-2010 Regular Session SB 1035 (Hancock) As Introduced Hearing Date: April 13, 2010 Fiscal: Yes Urgency: No TW:jd SUBJECT Municipal Utility District: Utility Charges: Delinquencies DESCRIPTION This bill, sponsored by the East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) and Alameda County, authorizes a municipal utility district (MUD) to collect delinquent fees incurred by a commercial or residential lessee, tenant, or subtenant by charging the delinquent fees to the property owner's tax roll, as specified. This bill deletes a provision of existing law which exempts water and sewer service to residential property from the lien remedy. BACKGROUND This bill is similar to last year's AB 1333 (Hancock, 2008), which, among other things, would have deleted the exemption of a MUD providing water or sewer services to residential property and allowed this type of MUD to place a lien on a property for delinquent fees or charges. This bill was vetoed. When water bills are not paid, municipal utility districts, such as EBMUD, are forced to either shut off water service or subsidize the cost of continued water service by charging more for water services to other ratepayers. When water is not available to maintain landscaped exteriors, neighborhoods begin to take on an unlived, blighted appearance, which in turn causes property values to decline. To respond to the problem of water shutoffs and resulting blighted areas, this bill would authorize water and sewer municipal utility districts, which are currently exempt from this remedy, to file a lien against the property (more) SB 1035 (Hancock) Page 2 of ? owner for their lessee, tenant, and subtenant delinquencies. All municipal utility districts, excluding electric, will also be able to place the delinquent utility charges on the real property tax roll. Although other utility providers already can impose a lien on property owners for delinquent utility fees, municipal utility districts providing water, sewage, and electric are unable to utilize this statutory remedy. This bill deletes the exemption of residential water and sewage providers, thereby allowing them to pursue this remedy. This bill was approved by the Senate Local Government Committee on April 7, 2010, by a vote of 4 to 1. CHANGES TO EXISTING LAW Existing law authorizes a municipal utility district to require the owner of record of real property within the district to pay the charges for services rendered to a lessee, tenant, or subtenant, and provides that those delinquent utility charges become a lien once a certificate is filed with the county recorder, as specified. The lien has the force, effect, and priority of a judgment lien. (Pub. Util. Code Sec. 12811.1(a).) Existing law provides the lien remedy to municipal utility districts (other than water, sewer, and electric) in addition to any other remedy provided by law. (Pub. Util. Code Sec. 12811.1(d).) Existing law provides that this code section does not apply to municipal utility districts providing water or sewer services to residential properties, or electric services. (Pub. Util. Code Sec. 12811.1(e).) This bill authorizes a municipal utility district, pursuant to a resolution or ordinance, to collect delinquent utility fees, tolls, rates, rentals, and other charges, together with interest and penalties, including any delinquent fees, tolls, rates, rentals, or other charges for services rendered to a lessee, tenant, or subtenant, on the tax roll in the same manner as property taxes. This bill would delete the above exemption for delinquent fees or charges for the furnishing of water or sewer services to residential properties. SB 1035 (Hancock) Page 3 of ? This bill requires a municipal utility district seeking to apply delinquent utility charges to the tax roll to: 1) prepare and file an annual report of delinquent charges for each affected parcel; 2) give published and mailed notice of the filing of the report and the time and place for a public hearing; 3) require the municipal utility district to hear and consider objections or protests of the report at the public hearing and potentially revise the report; and 4) by August 10 of each year, provide a final report to the county recorder to be added to the current tax assessment roll. This bill authorizes the municipal utility district to recover any delinquent fees, tolls, rates, rentals, or other charges, together with interest and penalties thereon, including any delinquent fees, tolls, rates, rentals, or other charges for services rendered to a lessee, tenant, or subtenant. This bill requires the municipal utility district to file a release of the lien within 30 days of receipt of payment of the delinquent charges. This bill requires the municipal utility district to reimburse the county for the reasonable expenses incurred by the county under this bill. This bill provides that the remedies in this bill are cumulative, and the district may pursue the remedies alternatively or consecutively. COMMENT 1. Stated need for the bill The author writes: Blight is becoming a more significant problem in the East Bay Municipal Utility District's (EBMUD) 331-square mile service area in the East San Francisco Bay. Blighted properties can lower the value of nearby properties, decrease the safety and livability of communities and impact area businesses. Maintaining landscaped exteriors can help keep blight at bay by giving properties a vibrant "lived in" look. A well-maintained exterior is an excellent deterrent to crime and helps maintain the value of neighboring properties. SB 1035 (Hancock) Page 4 of ? On-going water service is necessary to keep exteriors vibrant. However, unlike many water utilities that have the authority to record a lien on a property when water bills are not paid, EBMUD cannot. When water bills are not paid, EBMUD has no option but to terminate water service to the property or unfairly ask its other ratepayers to subsidize the cost of service to the delinquent account holders. A change in law is needed to provide EBMUD with same authority already vested with other water utilities in the state to record a lien for nonpayment. A lien places the obligation for payment on the responsible party without unduly penalizing other ratepayers. The sponsors of this bill argue that it will enable local residents and EBMUD to work together to keep communities vibrant and stable and enable water and sewer MUDs to have access to the same tools that other local utility providers use in the case of delinquent accounts. 2. Allowing liens on property for the failure to pay for residential water or sewer service There are at least two types of public utilities: "municipally-owned utilities," which are public utilities owned by cities; and "municipal utility districts" (MUDs), which are special districts organized for the purpose of providing utility service. There are hundreds of "municipally-owned utilities" in the state, but there are only several major MUDs (including the sponsor, the East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD)). Under existing law, MUDs may lien a property for the failure to pay charges for services that were rendered. This lien remedy does not apply, however, to delinquent fees or charges for the furnishing of water or sewer service to residential property or electrical service. That exemption was enacted in 1986 with respect to water service and broadened to include sewer service in 1998. In a reversal of that longstanding exemption, this bill would remove the exemption as it applies to residential water or sewer service, thus allowing MUDs to lien a property due to the failure of the property owner to pay for water or sewer service. In support of that change, the author maintains that: Senate Bill 1035 would provide EBMUD with the same authority SB 1035 (Hancock) Page 5 of ? other water utilities already have by removing the statutory barrier that precludes a municipal utility district, like EBMUD, from recording liens for non-payment (PUC section 12811.1). While this change would help ensure that MUDs are paid for services provided to lessees, tenants, and subtenants, the bill provides yet another lien which may subject a property owner to foreclosure, and goes counter to the exemption that was enacted in 1986. At the time the exemption was expanded in 1998 to include sewer service, the Senate Judiciary Committee analysis of the bill proposing that expansion (SB 2166, Costa, Ch. 739, Stats. 1998) noted that the change was intended to address the problem of public utilities combining billing for water and sewer service to avoid the then-existing prohibition for water service. Due to the history of the lien provision, AB 1333 (Hancock, 2008), which like this bill also proposed to remove the exemption for residential water and sewer service, was amended by this Committee to include a five-year sunset on the ability to lien for residential water or sewer service. The Committee also amended the bill to require the MUDs to report back to the Senate and Assembly Judiciary Committees on the effectiveness of using those liens. Because this bill raises similar concerns, the author's office agrees that the bill should also be similarly amended. The following language was included in AB 1333 by this Committee, revised to reflect updated reporting and sunset dates. Suggested amendment: 1. On page 5, line 7, add a new subdivision (f) to read: "Any district that places a lien on a property for water or sewer service pursuant to this section shall submit to the Assembly and Senate Committees on Judiciary, on or before January 1, 2015, a report containing all of the following information: (1) The total number of liens created under this section for water or sewer service and the total dollar amount of those liens. (2) The overall effectiveness of the liens and any problems associated with the use of those liens. 2. Sunset the bill on January 1, 2016. 3. Liability of property owner for tenant utility debt SB 1035 (Hancock) Page 6 of ? The author notes that EBMUD has been forced to discontinue water services or subsidize the delinquent fees by charging other customers more for their water services. However, MUDs have the benefit of requiring customers to provide a history of creditworthiness, requiring a deposit, and continued monitoring of customer accounts. MUDs are in the best position to monitor the delinquent fees and end service as necessary. Under the current version of the bill, if a residential or commercial tenant is the utility account holder and delinquent on utility bills, the residential or commercial property owner may be unaware of any problems. This bill currently does not limit its application to cases in which the property owner is the account holder, not the tenant. Accordingly, the author's office has agreed that the bill should be amended to include a cross-reference to Public Utilities Code Section 12822.6, which provides limitations on residential property owner liability for residential tenant utility debt, and amended to add an additional subdivision to protect commercial property owners from commercial tenant debt. Suggested amendments: 1. On page 2, line 3, strike out "A" and insert "Except when prohibited by Section 12822.6, a". 2. On page 5, line 1, add a new subdivision (5) to read: "The district may not recover on the tax roll any delinquent fees, tolls, rates, rentals or other charges for services for commercial use to a commercial tenant under an account established by the commercial tenant, from any subsequent tenant or the property owner, due to nonpayment of charges by a previous commercial tenant. For this purpose, the term "subsequent commercial tenant" shall not include any entity or adult person that was located at the same address during the period the charges or penalties accrued. This subdivision (c)(5) shall not apply to master-metered accounts." 4. Public Hearing Notice Requirement The bill requires the MUD general manager to give notice of public hearing when proposing that the delinquent charges be applied to the property owner's tax roll. The current language requires notice of the time and place of the public hearing but does not specify that the hearing date will be included on the notice. The author's office agreed to a technical amendment to SB 1035 (Hancock) Page 7 of ? clarify that the hearing date should be included on the notice of public hearing provided by the MUD general manager. Suggested amendment: On page 3, line 29 insert ", date, " after "time". Additionally, the bill does not specify how many days' notice of the public hearing that the MUD general manager is required to give the property owners. In order to address this concern, the author's office has agreed that an amendment is needed to specify that the MUD general manager is required to publish and mail the notice of public hearing at least 14 days prior to the public hearing date. Suggested amendment: On page 3, line 32 insert "at least 14 days prior to the date of the hearing" after "parcel". 5. Governor's veto of AB 1333 The Governor's veto message expressed his concern that allowing utility liens against property owners for water and sewer services could increase costs associated with foreclosed property and allow utility companies to benefit at a time of financial hardship for many property owners. As noted earlier, however, this bill is narrower than AB 1333. Support : California Special Districts Association Opposition : None Known HISTORY Source : Alameda County; East Bay Municipal Utility District Related Pending Legislation : None Known Prior Legislation : AB 1333 (Hancock, 2008) (See Background.) AB 2586 (Torrico, 2008), among other things, would have required that whenever a public utility, or a corporation that furnishes SB 1035 (Hancock) Page 8 of ? electrical, gas, heat, or water to residential units, as specified, and where the owner, manager, or operator of the residential units is listed by the corporation as the customer of record, the public utility or corporation would be required to provide written notification to the residential occupants at least 15 days prior to termination, prevent a successor in interest from terminating utility service with the intent to terminate the tenant's tenancy, and extended the notice period required to evict a tenant after a foreclosure. This bill was vetoed. SB 2166 (Costa, Chapter 739, Statutes of 1998) (See Comment 2.) Prior Vote : Senate Local Government Committee (Ayes 4, Noes 1) **************