BILL ANALYSIS SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE Senator Ellen M. Corbett, Chair 2009-2010 Regular Session SB 1046 (Cogdill) As Amended April 7, 2010 Hearing Date: April 20, 2010 Fiscal: Yes Urgency: No KB:jd SUBJECT Government Tort Claims: California State University DESCRIPTION This bill, sponsored by the California State University (CSU), would remove the CSU from the jurisdiction of the Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board (VCGCB) and allow the CSU to process its own claims pursuant to the Government Tort Claims Act. BACKGROUND The California State University System (CSU) was enacted by the Donahoe Higher Education Act (Act), which authorized the Board of Trustees to set policy, and adopt its own rules and procedures for the operation of the public university system. The Act declared the Board of Trustees to be an independent entity that, while bound to follow all of the laws pertaining to its mandate to provide higher education to Californians, may in all cases be exempt from being treated like a state agency. The California Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board (VCGCB) consists of three members: the Director of General Services who serves as the chair; the State Controller; and a public member appointed by the Governor. The primary functions of the Board are to: (1) compensate victims of violent crime and eligible family members for certain crime-related financial losses; (2) consider and settle all civil claims against the state; (3) provide equitable travel allowances to certain government officials; (4) respond to bid protests against the state alleging improper or unfair acts of agencies in the (more) SB 1046 (Cogdill) Page 2 of ? procurement of supplies and equipment; and (5) provide reimbursement to counties for special elections expenditures. The Government Tort Claims Act specifies that a claim against the state must be filed with the VCGCB, unless the claim is against a judicial branch or a judge, in which case the claim is filed with the Judicial Council. The University of California is exempt from the Tort Claims Act. In addition, the VCGCB is authorized to charge a fee equal to 15 percent of the total for any claim it approves for settlement. This bill, sponsored by the California State University (CSU), would remove the CSU from the jurisdiction of the Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board (VCGCB) and allow the CSU to process its own claims pursuant to the Government Tort Claims Act. This bill was approved by the Senate Education Committee on March 23, 2010 by a vote of 7-0. CHANGES TO EXISTING LAW Existing law , the Donahoe Higher Education Act (Act), establishes the California State University System. The Act authorized the Board of Trustees to set policy and adopt its own rules and procedures for the operation of that public system. (Ed. Code Sec. 66000.) Existing law provides that CSU is not a state agency and is exempt from such treatment, unless a statute explicitly provides that it applies to the university. (Gov. Code Sec. 11000.) Existing law further clarifies legislative intent that (a) before legislation may be applied to CSU, the legislation should be compatible with the mission and functions of CSU, and (b) CSU is not governed by any statute enacted after January 1, 1997, that does not amend the previously applicable act and that applies generally to the state or state agencies, departments, or boards, unless the statute expressly provides that the CSU is to be governed by that statute. (Ed. Code Sec. 66606.2.) Existing law , the Government Torts Claim Act (TCA), establishes the procedures for filing a claim against a state public agency. (Gov. Code Sec. 810 et seq.) The TCA specifies that a claim against the state must be filed with the Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board (VCGCB), unless the claim is against a SB 1046 (Cogdill) Page 3 of ? judicial branch or a judge, in which case the claim is filed with the Judicial Council. The University of California is exempt from the Tort Claims Act. (Gov. Code Sec. 905.6.) In addition, the VCGCB is authorized to charge a fee equal to 15 percent of the total for any claim it approves for settlement. (Gov. Code Sec. 905.2 (f).) This bill would designate the California State University as a "public entity" for the purposes of the Tort Claims Act. This bill would provide that all claims against the CSU for money or damages based upon an express contract or for an injury for which CSU is liable must be presented in accordance with the Tort Claims Act. This bill would require the Trustees of the CSU to act on a claim against the CSU in accordance with the procedure that the Trustees provide by rule. This bill would provide that the CSU is not authorized to adopt any rule that is inconsistent with the Tort Claims Act. This bill would provide that if a claim for money or damages against the CSU is mistakenly presented to the VCGCB, the board shall immediately notify the claimant of the error and shall include information on proper filing of the claim. This bill would specify that claims and actions shall be presented by delivering or mailing the claim to, or serving the action on, the Office of Risk Management at the Chancellor's Office of the CSU. COMMENT 1. Stated need for the bill The sponsor states: Over the past several years, CSU and its third-party administrator, Alliant Insurance, have struggled with the handling of claims against CSU. The additional layer that is the result of being under VCGCB's jurisdiction has created several issues including failed transmission of claims in a timely manner. These delays have sometimes resulted in CSU losing the claim because the statute of limitations had expired and therefore did not act within the deadlines SB 1046 (Cogdill) Page 4 of ? established by law. Another complicating factor is that the Office of the Attorney General recently decided to give legal opinions or recommendations on late-claim applications because it cannot charge back to the university for that work, and this task has now fallen to the CSU's internal General Counsel. In light of the recent state budget cuts to higher education and the increased costs of these settlements, CSU would like to modify the existing procedures in order to retain some cost savings and at the same time simplify the process for tort claims. These modifications would also align the CSU with the University of California, the community colleges and other public entities who already work under this same claim-filing independence. 2. Bill would authorize the CSU to process its own claims pursuant to the TCA The Tort Claims Act provides for the filing of claims against public entities for harm caused to any person, and establishes liability and immunity of the public entity for those acts. The timeline and procedures for presentation of the claim and the public entity's action on that claim are specified in the TCA. The purpose of the statutory requirements for presenting claims is to give the entity notice and provide an opportunity for investigating, and possibly settling the claim, without need of costly litigation. If the entity decides not to settle, or if the claimant is not satisfied with the settlement offered, then the claimant may initiate a lawsuit to recover damages. Pursuant to the TCA, claims against local public entities are filed with the entity's governing body, while claims against the state are filed with the VCGCB. (Gov. Code Sec. 900.) The VCGCB was created in 2004 by a budget trailer bill (SB 1102 (Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review) Chapter 227, Statutes of 2004) to take over the functions of the former victims' compensation board. SB 1102 also authorized the VCGCB to assess a charge of up to fifteen percent of the total approved claim for handling a tort claim. The CSU was captured in these provisions and thus considered a "state agency" under the TCA. Accordingly, all claims against the CSU must first formally be filed with the VCGCB. The CSU is also subject to the fifteen percent surcharge assessed by the VCGCB. CSU has historically investigated and handled claims through its own Risk Management Department. Although the claim must be formally filed with the VCGCB, that board then transmits the SB 1046 (Cogdill) Page 5 of ? claim to the CSU Risk Management Department for an investigation and a determination on whether to settle the claim or face a lawsuit. The VCGCB must ultimately approve CSU's recommended determination. According to the CSU, the additional administrative layer which results from being subject to the VCGCB's jurisdiction has caused significant delays in the resolution of claims. In a few instances, the claims were reportedly not processed by the VCGCB to the CSU Claims Administrator for over one year. These delays have been to the detriment of both the claimants and the CSU; claimants are not getting their claims resolved in a timely manner and the CSU cannot always act within the prescribed statute of limitations. The state's ongoing budget crisis has also led to reduction in the VCGCB's staff which has exacerbated the delays in processing. This bill would remove the CSU from the jurisdiction of the VCGCB and allow the CSU to process its own claims pursuant to the Government Tort Claims Act. By allowing the CSU to process its own claims, this bill would arguably help to ensure that the TCA has its intended effect of facilitating the resolution of claims without litigation. The CSU would still be bound by the parameters of the TCA, but would be authorized to receive claims directly, and thus resolve them more expeditiously. Committee staff notes that this bill would more closely align the CSU with the University of California and Community College Districts, who are exempt from the VCGCB claims process. 3. Recent amendments address concerns In response to concerns that the CSU would be authorized to adopt claims processing rules that run afoul of or are less protective of claimants than the Tort Claims Act, this bill was recently amended to specifically provide that the CSU may not adopt a rule that is inconsistent with the TCA. Furthermore, this bill was also amended to provide that if a claim for money or damages against the CSU is mistakenly provided to the VCGCB, the board shall immediately notify the claimant of the error and provide the claimant with information on proper filing of the claim. This will ensure that claimants are informed of the proper procedure for CSU claims so that they are not lost in error. Support : None Known SB 1046 (Cogdill) Page 6 of ? Opposition : None Known HISTORY Source : The California State University Related Pending Legislation : None Known Prior Legislation : SB 1724 (Runner, Chapter 453, Statutes of 2005) originally included various changes requested by the CSU including similar changes as provided in SB 1046. However, prior to final passage of SB 1724, the provisions related to the torts claims were amended out of the measure. AB 2321 (Hertzberg, Chapter 1007, Statutes of 2002) provided that the Judicial Council, rather than the VCGCB, would act on any claims against the courts, judges, or agencies within the judicial branch. Prior Vote : Senate Education Committee (Ayes 7, Noes 0) (Consent) **************