BILL ANALYSIS SB 1046 Page 1 Date of Hearing: June 29, 2010 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY Mike Feuer, Chair SB 1046 (Cogdill) - As Amended: April 7, 2010 SENATE VOTE : 30-0 SUBJECT: Government Tort Claims: California State University KEY ISSUE : Should the California State University system be exempted FROM the Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board, like the University of California, and allowed to process its own claims pursuant to the Government Tort Claims Act? FISCAL EFFECT : As currently in print this bill is keyed fiscal. SYNOPSIS This bill, sponsored by the California State University (CSU), removes the CSU from the jurisdiction of the Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board (VCGCB) and allows the CSU to process its own claims pursuant to the Government Tort Claims Act. The CSU asserts that this bill is necessary to avoid delayed claims processing that has occurred with the additional bureaucratic layer of the VCGCB, reduce costs (including the 15 percent surcharge assessed on claims by VCGCB), and align CSU with the University of California and the community colleges which are exempt from the VCGCB. The VCGCB opposes the bill, arguing that it could erode its ability to fund its operations and would deny claimants a neutral third-party to administer their claims. SUMMARY : Exempts CSU from the VCGCB and allows it to process its own claims. Specifically, this bill : 1)Designates the California State University as a "public entity" for the purposes of the Tort Claims Act. 2)Provides that all claims against the CSU for money or damages based upon an express contract or for an injury for which CSU is liable must be presented in accordance with the Tort Claims Act. SB 1046 Page 2 3)Requires the Trustees of the CSU to act on a claim against the CSU in accordance with the procedure that the Trustees provide by rule. 4)Provides that the CSU is not authorized to adopt any rule that is inconsistent with the Government Tort Claims Act (TCA). 5)Provides that if a claim for money or damages against the CSU is mistakenly presented to the VCGCB, the board shall immediately notify the claimant of the error and shall include information on proper filing of the claim. 6)Specifies that claims and actions shall be presented by delivering or mailing the claim to, or serving the action on, the Office of Risk Management at the Chancellor's Office of the CSU. EXISTING LAW : 1)Establishes, pursuant to the Donahoe Higher Education Act (Act), the California State University System. The Act authorizes the Board of Trustees to set policy and adopt its own rules and procedures for the operation of that public system. (Education Code Section 66000.) 2)Provides that CSU is not a state agency and is exempt from such treatment, unless a statute explicitly provides that it applies to the CSU. (Government Code Section 11000.) 3)Clarifies legislative intent that (a) before legislation may be applied to CSU, the legislation should be compatible with the mission and functions of CSU, and (b) CSU is not governed by any statute enacted after January 1, 1997, that does not amend the previously applicable act and that applies generally to the state or state agencies, departments, or boards, unless the statute expressly provides that the CSU is to be governed by that statute. (Education Code Section 66606.2.) 4)Establishes, under the TCA, the procedures for filing a claim against a state public agency. (Government Code Section 810 et seq.) 5)The TCA specifies that a claim against the state must be filed with the VCGCB, unless the claim is against a judicial branch SB 1046 Page 3 or a judge, in which case the claim is filed with the Judicial Council. The VCGCB is authorized to charge a fee equal to 15 percent of the total for any claim it approves for settlement. (Government Code Section 905.2 (f).) The University of California is exempt from the TCA. (Gov. Code Sec. 905.6.) COMMENTS : The CSU was enacted by the Donahoe Higher Education Act, which authorized the Board of Trustees to set policy, and adopt its own rules and procedures for the operation of the public university system. The Act declares the Board of Trustees to be an independent entity that, while bound to follow all of the laws pertaining to its mandate to provide higher education to Californians, may in all cases be exempt from being treated like a state agency. The Government Tort Claims Act specifies that a claim against the state must be filed with the VCGCB, unless the claim is against a judicial branch or a judge, in which case the claim is filed with the Judicial Council. The University of California is exempt from the Tort Claims Act. The primary functions of the VCGCB include: (1) compensate victims of violent crime and eligible family members for certain crime-related financial losses; (2) consider and settle all civil claims against the state; and (3) respond to bid protests against the state alleging improper or unfair acts of agencies in the procurement of supplies and equipment. In addition, the VCGCB is authorized to charge a fee equal to 15 percent of the total for any claim it approves for settlement. This bill, sponsored by the CSU, removes the CSU from the jurisdiction of the VCGCB and allows the CSU to process its own claims pursuant to the Government Tort Claims Act. This bill was approved by the Assembly Higher Education Committee on June 22, 2010 by a vote of 9-0. In support of the bill, the author states: Under current law the VCGCB is the entity that performs the administrative function of collecting fees for tort claims filed against state agencies including the CSU, but does not perform any investigation, only the ministerial function of assigning a claim number and referring the claim to the CSU for resolution. SB 1046 Page 4 Despite this minimal function, CSU must often wait weeks to receive their claims. Frequently, the delay with the VCGCB results in the expiration of the legal 20 day window in giving notice to the claimant of the claim's "insufficiency" or lack of timeliness. Failure to provide a notice of insufficiency or late notice within 20 days of receipt of the insufficient claim requires the claim to be "accepted". There is a 45 day window in which CSU must respond to a claimant. In cases where the 45 days has been passed, by law, the claim is deemed as having been rejected and the claimant can proceed with litigation. This Bill Authorizes the CSU to Process its Own Claims Pursuant to the TCA, Thus Avoiding Possible Processing Delays and Additional Costs : The Tort Claims Act provides for the filing of claims against public entities for harm caused to any person, and establishes liability and immunity of the public entity for those acts. The timeline and procedures for presentation of the claim and the public entity's action on that claim are specified in the TCA. The purpose of the statutory requirements for presenting claims is to give the entity notice and provide an opportunity for investigating, and possibly settling the claim, without need of costly litigation. If the entity decides not to settle, or if the claimant is not satisfied with the settlement offered, then the claimant may initiate a lawsuit to recover damages. Pursuant to the TCA, claims against local public entities are filed with the entity's governing body, while claims against the state are filed with the VCGCB. The VCGCB was created to take over the functions of the former victims' compensation board. SB 1102 (Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review), Chap. 227, Stats. 2004, authorized the VCGCB to assess a charge of up to 15 percent of the total approved claim for handling a tort claim. The CSU was captured in these provisions and thus considered a "state agency" under the TCA. Accordingly, all claims against the CSU must first formally be filed with the VCGCB. The CSU is also subject to the 15 percent surcharge assessed by the VCGCB. CSU has historically investigated and handled claims through its own Risk Management Department. Although the claim must be formally filed with the VCGCB, that board then transmits the SB 1046 Page 5 claim to the CSU Risk Management Department for an investigation and a determination on whether to settle the claim or face a lawsuit. The VCGCB must ultimately approve CSU's recommended determination. According to the CSU, the additional administrative layer which results from being subject to the VCGCB's jurisdiction has caused significant delays in the resolution of claims. In a few instances, the claims were reportedly not processed by the VCGCB to the CSU Claims Administrator for over a year. These delays have been to the detriment of both the claimants and the CSU - claimants are not getting their claims resolved in a timely manner and the CSU cannot always act within the prescribed statute of limitations. The state's ongoing budget crisis has also led to reduction in the VCGCB's staff, which has exacerbated the delays in processing. This bill removes the CSU from the jurisdiction of the VCGCB and allows the CSU to process its own claims pursuant to the Government Tort Claims Act. By allowing the CSU to process its own claims, this bill should help ensure that the TCA has its intended effect of facilitating the resolution of claims without litigation. The CSU would still be bound by the parameters of the TCA, but would be authorized to receive claims directly, and thus resolve them more expeditiously. This bill also more closely aligns the CSU with the University of California and Community College Districts, who are exempt from the VCGCB claims process. Bill Ensures that Claims Process is Protective of Claimants : To ensure that the CSU cannot adopt claims processing rules that run afoul of, or are less protective of claimants than, the Tort Claims Act, this bill specifically provides that the CSU may not adopt a rule that is inconsistent with the TCA. Furthermore, this bill provides that if a claim for money or damages against the CSU is mistakenly provided to the VCGCB, the board shall immediately notify the claimant of the error and provide the claimant with information on proper filing of the claim. This will ensure that claimants are informed of the proper procedure for CSU claims so that they are not lost in error. Prior Legislation : SB 1724 (Runner), Chap. 453, Stats. 2005, originally included various changes requested by the CSU including similar changes as provided in SB 1046. However, prior to final passage of SB 1724, the provisions related to the torts claims were amended out of the measure. SB 1046 Page 6 AB 2321 (Hertzberg), Chap. 1007, Stats. 2002, provided that the Judicial Council, rather than the VCGCB, would act on any claims against the courts, judges, or agencies within the judicial branch. ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : In support of the bill, the CSU writes: Over the past several years, CSU and its third-party administrator, Alliant Insurance, have struggled with the handling of claims against CSU. The additional layer that is the result of being under VCGCB's jurisdiction has created several issues including failed transmission of claims in a timely manner. These delays have sometimes resulted in CSU losing the claim because the statute of limitations had expired and therefore did not act within the deadlines established by law. Another complicating factor is that the Office of the Attorney General recently decided to give legal opinions or recommendations on late-claim applications because it cannot charge back to the university for that work, and this task has now fallen to the CSU's internal General Counsel. In light of the recent state budget cuts to higher education and the increased costs of these settlements, CSU would like to modify the existing procedures in order to retain some cost savings and at the same time simplify the process for tort claims. These modifications would also align the CSU with the University of California, the community colleges and other public entities who already work under this same claim-filing independence. ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION : In opposition to the bill, the VCGCB writes that it provides a neutral, third-party process for claims against the state without an appropriation: "This bill denies claimants that neutral party and forces them to file a claim directly with the entity that is the subject of the claim. Furthermore, this bill may set a precedent for other state entities seeking to independently administer their own claims. This could cause a decentralization of the claims process and a dilution of the benefits of third-party administration. It may also erode the [VCGCB]'s ability to self-fund its administration of claims process." SB 1046 Page 7 However, it is important to note that while the VCGCB may not require a direct legislative appropriation, it is nonetheless funded with state funds through its 15 percent surcharge assessed by the VCGCB on the state entities whose claims it administers. REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION : Support California State University (sponsor) Opposition Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board Analysis Prepared by : Leora Gershenzon / JUD. / (916) 319-2334