BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                           Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair

                                           1062 (Strickland)
          
          Hearing Date:  05/27/2010           Amended: 05/25/2010
          Consultant:  Jacqueline Wong-HernandezPolicy Vote: Public Safety  
          7-0
          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____
          BILL SUMMARY: SB 1062 is the public safety omnibus bill of  
          non-controversial changes to statute that are primarily  
          technical and corrective. This bill also changes procedures for  
          county probation departments with regard to the State Authorized  
          Risk Assessment Tool for Sex Offenders (SARATSO), and  
          requirements on the Department of Justice (DOJ) to maintain  
          additional information.
          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____
                            Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions                     2010-11            2011-12        
                 2012-13                  Fund
                                                                  
          State mandate: probation       Potentially significant  
          reimbursable costs               General

          Technical/clarifying code       Minor cost reduction from  
          streamlining tasks/code General    
          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____

          STAFF COMMENTS: SUSPENSE FILE.


          Existing law requires probation departments to do a SARATSO  
          assessment on every eligible person for whom it prepares a  
          probation report. This bill would require probation departments  
          to perform an assessment on eligible persons whether or not it  
          prepares a probation report on that person, and would require  
          that the assessment be done prior to the person's sentencing. By  
          requiring additional SARATSO assessments by probation  
          departments, this bill would impose a state-mandated local  
          program. This mandate would be prospective, and the extent of  
          the expense to county probation departments for specifically  
          administering a SARATSO to eligible persons for whom a report  










          will not be prepared is unknown.

          This bill also expands the requirement that the DOJ maintain  
          files of existing information to include the Department of  
          Mental Health (DMH) and probation departments. This bill would  
          require DMH and probation departments, in addition to the  
          agencies already subject to the requirement, to provide new  
          information to DOJ upon request regarding high risk sex  
          offenders. Law enforcement agencies generally have broad  
          authority to share information, and do share information with  
          DOJ. By creating a new mandate, however, the state could be  
          required to reimburse county probation departments for tasks  
          they are already completing without a mandate. Additionally,  
          requiring DOJ to maintain additional information would likely  
          result in additional requests to county probation to share the  
          information. 


          Existing law requires DOJ to provide a summary profile of a  
          sexual habitual offender to each law enforcement agency when an  
          individual registers in, or moves to, the area in which the law  
          enforcement agency is located. This bill would delete this  
          requirement 



          Page 2

          SB 1062 (Strickland)



          and instead require DOJ to provide a bulletin to law enforcement  
          agencies on each high 

          risk sex offender via the California Sex Offender Registry and  
          the California Law Enforcement Web (CLEW). This change would  
          likely result in minor administrative savings to DOJ.