BILL ANALYSIS SB 1136 Page 1 Date of Hearing: August 4, 2010 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Felipe Fuentes, Chair SB 1136 (Cox) - As Amended: August 2, 2010 Policy Committee: Education Vote:9-0 Urgency: Yes State Mandated Local Program: No Reimbursable: No SUMMARY This bill limits the amount of GF/98 funding the state can defer within a fiscal year (intra-year deferrals) from small school districts and sunsets this limitation on September 1, 2011, as specified. Specifically, this bill: 1)Defines small school districts as those with an average daily attendance (ADA) equal to or less than 500 (excluding charter school ADA) for the 2009-10 principal apportionment. 2)Prohibits a small school district's apportionment deferral from exceeding $225 multiplied by the 2009-10 principal apportionment ADA, at any time during the fiscal year (FY). This bill further establishes this prohibition only applies to deferrals within a single FY. 3)Specifies the provisions of this bill are not meant to increase the deferral amount of any other local education agency (LEA) to meet the statewide deferral amount specified in existing law. FISCAL EFFECT If a small school district's apportionment deferral does not exceed $225 per ADA, there are increased GF interest costs, of approximately $180,000. This assumes the state would need to borrow an additional $9 million for up to six months at a rate of four percent. Approximately 300 school districts with a combined ADA of 55,667, which equals 0.93% of total state ADA (6 million), qualify under the provisions of this bill. COMMENTS SB 1136 Page 2 1)Background . Due to the state's fiscal crisis, cash management at the state level has become key to balancing the budget. In order to have more cash on hand, the state enacted a series of apportionment deferrals for school districts and local governments in the 2008-09 FY. These deferrals are scheduled to continue, with some changes, into the 2010-11 FY. The state has enacted two types of deferrals: inter-year (across FYs) and intra-year (within the FY). Inter-year deferrals defer payments required to be made in one FY to the subsequent FY. For example, in 2003-04, the state moved the second principal apportionment payment for K-12 schools from June 2003 to July 2004. This enabled the state to score approximately $1.1 billion in one-time GF/98 savings. Intra-year deferrals defer state payments within a FY. For example, prior to the enactment of the cash management legislation in the 2008-09 FY, the state paid school districts at several points in the year, with large allocations occurring in July, October, and March. Legislation enacted in 2009-10 deferred these payments to later in the same fiscal year, which allows the state to conduct less internal borrowing for the purposes of having available cash. 2)Purpose . In order to mitigate the deferral of state apportionment payments, school districts have enacted internal borrowing measures or borrowed from outside sources, such as the county office of education, the county treasurer, or issuing tax and revenue anticipation notes, to remain solvent. According to the Small School District Association (SSDA), sponsor of this bill, "Very small school districts have very small budgets and do not have the internal borrowing resources similar to large school district. Internal borrowing can come from developer fees accounts, school bond capital accounts, and other accounts within a school district such as general funds. The internal borrowing has to be repaid by the end of the year but does provide a significant source of cash flow and flexibility for school districts. Small school districts, however, do not have the same internal resources for cash flow borrowing nor do their counties. They typically do not have short term lines of credit with local banks because there are no local banks. Consequently, to meet the current potential SB 1136 Page 3 deferral these school districts must make further reductions in their educational programs in order to have borrowable resources to meet the cash flow requirements of paying contracts and salaries during the time of deferral." 3)Existing law . AB 5 X8 (Budget Committee), Chapter 1, Statutes of 2009 and AB 14 X8 (Budget Committee), Chapter 10, Statutes of 2009, established intra-year and inter-year deferrals for K-12 apportionment payments and other local government payments for the 2009-10 and 2010-11 FY. Statute authorizes intra-year deferrals of K-12 apportionments, not exceeding $2.5 billion at any given time that must be paid back by April 29, 2011. The following chart displays the intra-year deferrals enacted for the 2009-10 and 2010-11 FYs. ----------------------------------- | | | | 2009-10 FY | 2010-11 FY | | | | |-----------------+-----------------| | | | | July to October | July to | | | September | | | | |-----------------+-----------------| | | | | August to | October to | | October | January | | | | |-----------------+-----------------| | | | | October to | March to May | | December | | | | | |-----------------+-----------------| | | | | November to | | | January | | | | | ----------------------------------- SB 1136 Page 4 In addition to the intra-year deferrals, AB 14 X8 permanently rescheduled K-12 revenue limit and categorical program payments to provide five percent payments in July and August and nine percent payments for all remaining months in the fiscal year. This change will better align K-12 funding with local program expenditures and provide more predictable GF allocations at the state level. Current law sunsets the authorization for intra-year deferrals on September 1, 2011. Existing law exempts small local governments from intra-year deferrals in the 2010-11 FY. For the purposes of this exemption, small cities and counties are defined as having populations of less than 50,000. This bill limits the amount of K-12 apportionments deferred from small school districts as part of intra-year deferrals, as specified. 4)Is this bill necessary ? AB 14 X8 authorizes school districts to seek a hardship waiver if they did not receive apportionment payments as part of the intra-year deferrals, as specified. In order to qualify for this waiver, the county superintendent of schools is required to certify to the Superintendent of Public Instruction and the Department of Finance (DOF) that the school district is unable to meet its expenditure obligations for the time period of the deferral. According to DOF, eight school districts received a waiver. This existing waiver process continues until September 2011. The committee may wish to consider whether or not this bill is needed, given a waiver exists in current law. 5)K-12 principal apportionments . Approximately 80% of state payments to school districts are distributed through the principal apportionment system. Under this system, school districts receive payments for 21 programs, with funding distributed according to monthly payment schedules set by law. The apportionment schedule for most school districts is generally uniform throughout the year, but has smaller payments in July and larger payments in August and February. (Current law also authorizes two alternative payment schedules that provide larger payments in the beginning of the fiscal SB 1136 Page 5 year. These schedules are used for small school districts that receive a large percentage of their funding from property taxes and, therefore, are more cash poor at the beginning of the fiscal year.) State revenue limit payments, which provide general purpose funding for districts, represent about 80% of the principal apportionment payment. In addition, current law requires that 15 specified categorical programs be paid using the principal apportionment system. At its discretion, SDE makes payments for five other categorical programs through the principal apportionment. Analysis Prepared by : Kimberly Rodriguez / APPR. / (916) 319-2081