BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  SB 1137|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  SB 1137
          Author:   Senate Banking, Finance and Insurance Committee
          Amended:  As introduced
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE BANKING, FINANCE, AND INS. COMM  :  11-0, 4/7/10
          AYES:  Calderon, Cogdill, Correa, Cox, Florez, Kehoe, Liu,  
            Lowenthal, Padilla, Price, Runner


           SUBJECT  :    Residential mortgage lenders

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill corrects two typographical errors in a  
          statute enacted last year, to conform California to the  
          federal Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing  
          Act of 2008 (SAFE Act).

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing federal law provides for the SAFE  
          Act, pursuant to Title V of the provisions of the Housing  
          and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (HR 3221; Public Law  
          110-289).  The SAFE Act required all states to license and  
          register their mortgage loan originators, as defined,  
          through a nationwide organization called the Nationwide  
          Mortgage Licensing System and Registry.  Any state that  
          failed to implement a mortgage loan originator licensing  
          system, in compliance with the SAFE Act, by July 30, 2009  
          risked direct intervention by the U.S. Department of  
          Housing and Urban Development (HUD).  Under the SAFE Act,  
          HUD is authorized to establish and maintain a mortgage loan  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1137
                                                                Page  
          2

          originator system in any state that fails to voluntarily  
          comply with SAFE.  

          Existing law, pursuant to SB 36 (Calderon), Chapter 160,  
          Statutes of 2009, conforms California's Real Estate Law,  
          Finance Lenders Law, and Residential Mortgage Lending Act  
          to the SAFE Act, thus preserving California's ability to  
          continue regulating mortgage loan origination by  
          non-depository institutions operating in California.

          This bill corrects two typographical errors in SB 36.

           Background
           
          SB 36 was a 72-page bill that significantly amended three  
          of California's mortgage lending and brokering laws, and  
          gave the Department of Real Estate and Department of  
          Corporations significant rulemaking authority to facilitate  
          California's compliance with the SAFE Act.  Both  
          departments have begun the process of transitioning their  
          licensees and licensees' employees onto the Nationwide  
          Mortgage Licensing System and Registry, and expect to enact  
          emergency and final regulations implementing the SAFE Act  
          later this year.  HUD is also in the process of finalizing  
          its SAFE Act implementing regulations this year.  Given the  
          length and complexity of SB 36 and the extensive rulemaking  
          processes underway at both the state and federal levels, it  
          is likely that additional cleanup changes will be necessary  
          to SB 36.  This bill was introduced to provide a vehicle  
          for those changes.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  No    
          Local:  No

          JJA:nl  4/14/10   Senate Floor Analyses 

                       SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  NONE RECEIVED

                                ****  END  ****