BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  SB 1143|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                              UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 1143
          Author:   Liu (D), et al
          Amended:  8/17/10
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE EDUCATION COMMITTEE  :  7-0, 4/21/10
          AYES:  Romero, Huff, Alquist, Hancock, Liu, Price, Wyland
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Maldonado, Simitian

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE :  8-0, 5/27/10
          AYES:  Kehoe, Alquist, Denham, Price, Walters, Wolk,  
            Wyland, Yee
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Cox, Corbett, Leno

           SENATE FLOOR  :  22-10, 6/3/10
          AYES:  Alquist, Calderon, Cedillo, Dutton, Hancock, Huff,  
            Kehoe, Leno, Liu, Lowenthal, Negrete McLeod, Oropeza,  
            Pavley, Price, Romero, Runner, Simitian, Steinberg,  
            Strickland, Walters, Wolk, Wyland
          NOES:  Ashburn, Cogdill, Corbett, Correa, Denham,  
            DeSaulnier, Ducheny, Florez, Wright, Yee
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Aanestad, Cox, Harman, Hollingsworth,  
            Padilla, Wiggins, Vacancy, Vacancy

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  57-14, 8/19/10 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Community colleges:  student success and  
          completion:  
                      task force and plan

           SOURCE  :     Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1143
                                                                Page  
          2



           DIGEST :    This bill establishes legislative findings that  
          the California Community Colleges Board of Governors shall  
          adopt a plan for promoting and improving California  
          Community Colleges student success after convening a  
          taskforce to examine best practices within the colleges and  
          effective models throughout the nation that accomplish this  
          objective.

           Assembly Amendments  delete the Senate version relating to  
          the calculation of full-time equivalent student enrollment  
          for purposes of revenue apportionment within the California  
          Community Colleges, insert new language, and made minor  
          technical changes.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law establishes the California  
          Community Colleges (CCC), under the administration of the  
          Board of Governors of the CCC, as one of the three segments  
          of postsecondary education in this state.

          This bill establishes legislative findings that the CCC  
          Board of Governors (BOG) shall adopt a plan for promoting  
          and improving CCC student success after convening a  
          taskforce to examine best practices within the colleges and  
          effective models throughout the nation that accomplish this  
          objective.  Specifically, this bill:

          1.Establishes legislative findings that the CCC BOG shall  
            adopt  plan for promoting and improving a CCC student  
            success after convening a task force to examine best  
            practices within the colleges and effective models  
            throughout the nation that accomplish this objective and  
            requires the focus of the taskforce to include, but not  
            be limited to:

             A.    Multiple measures of assessing completion and  
                success, including, but not limited to, attaining  
                college-level skills, accumulating college-level  
                course credits, earning a degree or certificate, or  
                transferring to a four-year college or university.

             B.    Effective programs for ensuring student completion  
                and success.







                                                               SB 1143
                                                                Page  
          3


             C.    Statutory and regulatory barriers to student  
                success.

             D.    Best practices for promoting student success and  
                completion, including, but not limited to, basic  
                skills.

             E.    Alternative funding options for promoting best  
                practices in student completion and providing  
                necessary services to students.

             F.    Alternative funding options instituted in other  
                states.

             G.    The effective use of technology for CCC colleges  
                and districts to promote, evaluate, and improve  
                student success.

          2.Specifies that the taskforce shall include a broad  
            representation of stakeholders, including but not limited  
            to faculty.

          3.Requires the taskforce and the CCC Board of Governors,  
            prior to presenting its recommendations, as specified, to  
            facilitate discussions with key community college  
            stakeholders and others to provide input on the findings  
            and recommendations of the taskforce.

          4.Requires the CCC BOG, prior to implementation of this  
            plan, to report its recommendations to the Senate  
            Education Committee and the Assembly Higher Education  
            Committee at a joint hearing to be convened no later than  
            March 1, 2012.

           Comments

           The Institute for Higher Education Leadership & Policy  
          (IHELP) has issued several reports in the last few years  
          calling on California to make CCC student completion, as  
          well as success, a state priority, particularly in light of  
          the need for a more highly skilled workforce.  According to  
          IHELP, less than one-fourth of the students who enroll in  
          CCC intending to complete a college program do so, and much  







                                                               SB 1143
                                                                Page  
          4

          of the reason lies with the state's policies.

          IHELP identifies the current financing system, which funds  
          CCC based on the number of full-time equivalent students  
          (FTES) it reports at a date in the early term, as policy  
          that disproportionately emphasizes the front end of the  
          student's college pathway and does not encourage support or  
          reward for the student's success.  Thus, IHELP recommends  
          funding completions along with enrollments, with bonus  
          funding for completion by disadvantaged and under-prepared  
          students.

          In addition to funding changes, IHELP recommends the  
          following policy changes, among others:
           
           1.Increase the flexibility in hiring in order to meet  
            student demand.

          2.Provide CCC more flexibility in the use of its funds.

          3.Allow CCC to keep fee revenues.

          4.Remove restrictions on campus-based fees.

          5.Develop an affordability policy based on the total cost  
            of college attendance.

          6.Revise assessment and placement policies.

          7.Revise campus matriculation policies to provide a clear  
            guidance that students can follow to progress quickly  
            toward completion of their selected programs.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/23/10) 

          Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce (source) 
          Business Council of San Joaquin County
          Cabrillo College
          California Community Colleges Chancellor's Office
          Campaign for College Opportunity
          Chabot Las Positas Community College District







                                                               SB 1143
                                                                Page  
          5

          Coast Community College District
          Community College Funding 
          Community College League of California
          Contra Costa Council 
          Glendale Community College
          Hispanic Association of Colleges and Universities
          Kern Community College District
          Long Beach Chamber of Commerce
          Long Beach City College
          Los Angeles Community College District
          Los Angeles County Business Federation 
          Los Rios Community College District
          Mt. San Jacinto Community College District
          Orange County Business Council
          Palo Verde College
          Pasadena City College
          REAL Coalition
          Regional Chamber of Commerce- San Gabriel Valley
          Rio Hondo College
          San Bernardino Valley College
          San Diego Community College District
          Yosemite Community College District

           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  8/23/10)

          California Federation of Teachers
          California School Employees Association
          California Teachers Association
          Faculty Association of California Community Colleges

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the author's office,  
          increasing the rate of community college degree and  
          certificate completion will help build a skilled and  
          economically productive labor force.  The author notes  
          that, of those entering the community colleges seeking a  
          degree (as opposed to remediation or enrichment); only 29  
          percent complete a certificate or degree or transfer to a  
          university within seven years of enrolling.  This bill  
          seeks to establish a funding formula that rewards increased  
          completion rates.  Using a student census that averages the  
          count of those enrolled one-fifth of the way into a course  
          with the count of students who complete the course, creates  
          an incentive for community colleges to assist students to  
          enroll in appropriate courses, and complete their courses,  







                                                               SB 1143
                                                                Page  
          6

          certificates, and degrees.

           ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION  :    Opponents argue that this bill  
          would lead to a decrease in funding for community colleges  
          due to circumstances that are, many times, beyond the  
          college's control, without recognizing that community  
          colleges are currently underfunded.  This bill would only  
          serve to reduce the resources that students need in order  
          to ensure success. 


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 
          AYES:  Adams, Ammiano, Arambula, Bass, Beall, Bill  
            Berryhill, Tom Berryhill, Block, Blumenfield, Bradford,  
            Brownley, Buchanan, Caballero, Charles Calderon, Carter,  
            Conway, Cook, Coto, Davis, De La Torre, De Leon, Evans,  
            Feuer, Fletcher, Fuentes, Fuller, Galgiani, Garrick,  
            Gatto, Gilmore, Hall, Hayashi, Hernandez, Hill, Huber,  
            Huffman, Jones, Lieu, Logue, Bonnie Lowenthal, Mendoza,  
            Miller, Nava, Nestande, Niello, Nielsen, V. Manuel Perez,  
            Portantino, Saldana, Solorio, Audra Strickland,  
            Torlakson, Torres, Torrico, Tran, Villines, John A. Perez
          NOES:  Anderson, Blakeslee, Chesbro, DeVore, Gaines,  
            Hagman, Harkey, Knight, Monning, Norby, Silva, Skinner,  
            Smyth, Swanson
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Eng, Fong, Furutani, Jeffries, Ma,  
            Ruskin, Salas, Yamada, Vacancy


          PQ:nl  8/23/10   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****