BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 1173
                                                                  Page 1

          Date of Hearing:   June 29, 2010

           ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY AND TOXIC MATERIALS
                                  Pedro Nava, Chair
                     SB 1173 (Wolk) - As Amended:  June 10, 2010

           SENATE VOTE  :   22-11
           
          SUBJECT  :  Recycled water: raw water.

           SUMMARY  :  Prohibits the use of raw water for non-potable uses  
          when recycled water is available and appropriate.  Specifically,  
           this bill  :

          1)Defines "raw water" as untreated surface water or groundwater  
            and excludes remediated groundwater.

          2)Prohibits using raw water for non-potable uses if recycled  
            water meets criteria for quantity, quality, and cost is  
            available.

          3)Adds a criterion that the supply of recycled water must also  
            be "reliable" before use can be required.  In determining  
            reliability, this bill requires the State Water Resources  
            Control Board (SWRCB) to consider whether the recycled water  
            supply is subject to interruption. 

           EXISTING LAW  : 

          1)Prohibits the waste or unreasonable use of water and provides  
            that the right to use water does not extend to water that is  
            unreasonably used or wasted.

          2)Prohibits the use of potable water for non-potable purposes  
            (for example outside irrigation) if recycled water is  
            available at adequate quality, cost, and will not have adverse  
            impacts on public health, the environment, or other water  
            rights holders.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  The SWRCB estimates that under this bill an  
          additional waste and unreasonable use hearing will occur once  
          every two to three years.  A typical hearing costs about $65,000  
          to complete.  There would be a potential cost to water users who  
          are currently using raw water that would be required to use  
          recycled water when it is available.








                                                                  SB 1173
                                                                  Page 2


           COMMENTS  :  

           1)Need for the bill.   According to the author, "based on the  
            California Water Plan, recycled water has the potential to  
            provide nearly 1.5 million acre feet annually of new water for  
            California by 2030.  (Enough water for 3 million California  
            families.) 

            Recycled water use provides the same benefits to California  
            when it is used to replace raw water as when it is used to  
            replace potable supplies.  This bill expands current law to  
            ensure that recycled water supplies will be used to replace  
            both potable and raw water in the future." 







































                                                                  SB 1173
                                                                  Page 3



           2)Recycled water  .  Recycled water, sometimes called reclaimed  
            water, is former wastewater (sewage) that has been treated to  
            remove solids and certain impurities.  Recycled water is used  
            for many purposes including agricultural irrigation, landscape  
            irrigation, groundwater recharge, and seawater intrusion  
            barriers.  Before recycled water can be used for these  
            beneficial uses, the SWRCB and Department of Public Health  
            requires treatment to remove pollutants that could be harmful  
            to the beneficial use of the water.

           3)A waste or an unreasonable use of water  .  In California the  
            use of potable domestic water for non-potable purposes is a  
            waste or unreasonable use within the meaning of California  
            Constitutional Article X, Section 2, if recycled water is  
            available that meets specific conditions.  Those conditions  
            include that the recycled water is of adequate quality, is  
            furnished at a reasonable cost, that it meets public health  
            requirements, will not adversely affect downstream water  
            rights, and will not degrade the environment.  This means that  
            if recycled water is available that meets the conditions  
            established in statute and a water user instead uses potable  
            water, the water rights associated with the potable water are  
            at risk for violating Article X, Section 2 of the California  
            Constitution.


           4)How enforceable are the prohibitions against a waste of water?   
             The current requirements to use recycled water in lieu of  
            potable water is only enforceable by a loss of water rights.   
            This standard was established in 1928, when voters approved  
            Proposition 7, amending the California Constitution to  
            prohibit waste and unreasonable use and diversion.  In the  
            case of recycled water vs. raw water use, there may not be a  
            water rights holder involved in the decisions to use recycled  
            water thereby leaving the standard unenforceable.

                 The Committee may wish to consider adding more  
               appropriated enforcement authority for the SWRCB to  
               discourage this waste of raw water.

           1)Global warming and the use of recycled water quality  .  Under  
            this bill, the SWRCB is required to make a finding that  
            recycled water is of adequate quality, is furnished at a  








                                                                  SB 1173
                                                                  Page 4

            reasonable cost, that it meets public health requirements,  
            will not adversely affect downstream water rights, and will  
            not degrade the environment.  One of the key considerations  
            that the SWRCB should include is the potential effect of using  
            recycled water on green house gas production and global  
            warming.

                 The Committee may wish to consider requiring the SWRCB  
               to include considering issues such as energy use and  
               transportation energy use when determining whether recycled  
               water is the appropriate source for water projects.

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :

           Support

           California Association of Sanitation Agencies 
          California Landscape Contractors Association 
          California Water Association 
          City of Camarillo 
          Contra Costa Water District 
          Inland Empire Utilities Agency

           Opposition
           
          None received.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Bob Fredenburg / E.S. & T.M. / (916)  
          319-3965