BILL ANALYSIS
SB 1173
Page 1
Date of Hearing: August 4, 2010
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Felipe Fuentes, Chair
SB 1173 (Wolk) - As Amended: August 2, 2010
Policy Committee: Water, Parks and
Wildlife Vote: 7-4
Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials6-3
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY
This bill conditionally prohibits the use of raw water for
nonpotable use if recycled water is available. Specifically,
this bill:
1)Defines "raw water" as untreated surface water or groundwater.
2)Expands, to include the use of raw water for nonpotable use,
the existing declaration that the use of potable domestic
water for nonpotable use is a waste or unreasonable use if
recycled water is available.
3)Adds "reliability" to the criteria by which the State Water
Resources Control Board (SWRCB) determines the availability of
recycled water.
FISCAL EFFECT
1)Minor costs of less than $100,000 every few years to SWRCB to
conduct a waste and unreasonable use hearing.
2)Annual cost to DPH of an unknown but significant amount to
review water recycling project. While the actual number of
new recycling projects that will result from this bill is
unknown, DPH estimates an additional 150 water recycling
projects per year, with approximately 40 hours of review time
per project. Under those assumptions, DPH would face annual
costs of approximately $550,000, equivalent to three to four
positions. (GF, to be reimbursed by fee revenue collected
pursuant to existing authority.)
SB 1173
Page 2
COMMENTS
1)Rationale . The author contends the existing prohibition on
the use of potable domestic water for nonpotable purposes if
recycled water is available should be applied to raw water,
too. This is because, according to the author, raw water is
more appropriately reserved for treatment and subsequent use
as drinking water, thereby extending the state's water
supplies.
2)Background . The California Constitution prohibits the waste
or unreasonable use of water and provides that the right to
use water does not extend to unreasonable or wasteful use.
Existing law declares it a waste or an unreasonable use of
water to use potable domestic water for nonpotable use, such
as landscape irrigation, if recycled water is available that
is of adequate quality, meaning it is safe and not too costly.
According to the law, SWRCB is responsible for determining
the availability of recycled water of adequate quality.
Recycled water is former sewage treated to meet minimal
health and safety standards as determined by SWRCB and
the Department of Public Health (DPH). DPH reports it
must review all new recycled water projects, the cost of
which it can recover through existing billing mechanisms.
Analysis Prepared by : Jay Dickenson / APPR. / (916) 319-2081