BILL ANALYSIS SB 1233 Page 1 SENATE THIRD READING SB 1233 (Oropeza) As Amended May 17, 2010 Majority vote SENATE VOTE :35-0 JUDICIARY 10-0 APPROPRIATIONS 17-0 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Ayes:|Feuer, Tran, Brownley, |Ayes:|Fuentes, Conway, | | |Evans, Hagman, Jones, | |Bradford, | | |Knight, Monning, Nava, | |Huffman, Coto, Davis, De | | |Huffman | |Leon, Gatto, Hall, | | | | |Harkey, Miller, Nielsen, | | | | |Norby, Skinner, Solorio, | | | | |Torlakson, Torrico | |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------| | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY : Removes the sunset for the Secretary of State's (SOS) Safe at Home Program and requires that the name change records for program participants be permanently retained. Specifically, this bill : 1)Removes the sunset from the Safe at Home address confidentiality program, making the program permanent. 2)Removes the sunset on the Safe at Home voter confidentiality program, making the program permanent. 3)Provides an exemption, for change of name records, to the requirement that any records or documents pertaining to a Safe at Home program participant be retained and held confidential for a period of three years after termination of certification of participation in the program, and then destroyed, and instead requires that such records be retained permanently. EXISTING LAW : 1)Establishes, until January 1, 2013, an address confidentiality program to which victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking may apply by completing an application in person at a community-based victims' assistance program. The SB 1233 Page 2 application must be approved by the SOS for the purpose of enabling state and local agencies to respond to requests for public records without disclosing a program participant's residence address contained in any public record and otherwise to provide for confidentiality of that person's identity. 2)Establishes, until January 1, 2013, a similar address confidentiality program for reproductive health care services providers, employees, volunteers, and patients. 3)Provides that the voter registration of a participant in an address confidentiality program is confidential, and requires the SOS to act as that person's agent for service of process, and to designate a substitute mailing address for participants. 4)Provides, until January 1, 2013, that any person filing with the county elections official a new affidavit of registration or reregistration who is a participant in the address confidentiality program may have the information relating to his or her residence address, telephone number, and email address appearing on the affidavit declared confidential. 5)Provides that any records or documents pertaining to a program participant shall be retained and held confidential for a period of three years after termination of certification of participation in the program, and then destroyed, as specified. FISCAL EFFECT : According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, permanent extension of annual program administrative costs-currently about $300,000 (General Fund)-in 2012-13 and beyond. COMMENTS : The Safe at Home program, created by SB 489 (Alpert), Chapter 1005, Statutes of 1998, allows victims of domestic violence or stalking to apply to the SOS to request an alternate address to be used in public records. The purpose of that program is to "enable state and local agencies to respond to requests for public records without disclosing the changed name or location of a victim of domestic violence or stalking." The SOS provides a substitute, publicly accessible address for these victims while protecting their actual residences or locations. The SOS at the substitute address provided. A program SB 1233 Page 3 participant, once certified, may stay in the program for four years, after which re-certification is required. In 2002, the Safe at Home program was expanded to include reproductive health care services providers, employees, volunteers, and patients with the purpose of preventing potential acts of violence from being committed against them who assist in the provision of reproductive health care services and the patients seeking those services. [AB 797 (Shelley), Chapter 380, Statutes of 2002.] According to the Safe at Home 2009 Legislative Report, there are 2,437 active participants in the program, and 4,974 participants have been served since the program's inception in 1999. The original 2005 sunset date for the Safe at Home Program has been extended twice. First, AB 797 extended the sunset date to January 1, 2008. AB 2169 (Montanez), Chapter 475, Statutes of 2006, subsequently extended it until January 1, 2013. This bill removes the sunset for the Safe at Home Program, thereby making it permanent. It also requires that the SOS permanently retain name change records for program participants. SB 489, which created the Safe at Home program over a decade ago, included the original sunset provision apparently to address concerns raised about the cost and appropriateness of the SOS to administer the program. An initial prior extension of the sunset date in SB 797 also received opposition from the SOS due to concerns about cost. Those concerns appeared to be centered on the addition of reproductive health care service providers, employees, volunteers or patients to the program. AB 2169 in 2006 would have removed the sunset entirely, but instead extended the program to 2013 due to concerns that a separate measure [SB 1062 (Bowen)], which included victims of sexual assault in the programs, would significantly increase the program's population and cost. In contrast, this bill has received no opposition and the previous concerns about the cost of administering the program have not been raised, likely because they are outweighed by the demonstrated benefits of the program. Furthermore, as noted by the SOS's Safe at Home Legislative Report, the economic crisis and a rise in domestic violence cases has increased the demand for victim assistance and information. By permanently establishing the address confidentiality programs, the state can SB 1233 Page 4 assure participants that their anonymity, and thus their safety, is not in jeopardy. Under current law, if a proceeding for a change of name is commenced by the filing of a petition, the court is required to issue an order directing all persons interested in the matter to show cause as to why the application for change of name should not be granted. A copy of the order to show cause must also be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the county. However, if the petitioner is a participant in the Safe at Home Program, publication is not required. Additionally, the court is required to keep confidential the current legal name of the petitioner and prohibited from publishing that name by any means or in any public forum. In lieu of reciting the proposed name, the court is required to state that the proposed name is confidential and will be on file with the SOS pursuant to the provisions of the address confidentiality program. Thus, the SOS currently maintains the only complete record of a program participant's confidential name change. However, the SOS is also required to destroy closed or terminated Safe at Home case files after three years. This can result in the destruction of all records pertaining to a participant's previous name if the participant chooses to opt out of the program. Accordingly, this bill requires the SOS to permanently maintain records pertaining to confidential name changes of program participants, thereby ensuring that the sole complete records of a participant's prior name are not lost forever. This is consistent with the requirements currently imposed on trial court clerks with respect to the maintenance of name change court records for individuals who are not participants in the Safe at Home program. Analysis Prepared by : Leora Gershenzon / JUD. / (916) 319-2334 FN: 0005920