BILL ANALYSIS ------------------------------------------------------------ |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 1303| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |1020 N Street, Suite 524 | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ------------------------------------------------------------ THIRD READING Bill No: SB 1303 Author: Wolk (D) Amended: As introduced Vote: 21 SENATE NATURAL RES. & WATER COMMITTEE : 9-0, 4/13/10 AYES: Pavley, Cogdill, Hollingsworth, Huff, Kehoe, Lowenthal, Padilla, Simitian, Wolk SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : Senate Rule 28.8 SUBJECT : Protected species: accidental take: agricultural activities SOURCE : Author DIGEST : This bill extends the sunset date to the accidental take provisions of the state endangered species act, from January 1, 2011, to January 1, 2012. ANALYSIS : In 1997, the Legislature passed and the Governor signed SB 231 (Costa), a bill that established a new provision in the California Endangered Species Act removing the prohibition against the take of listed species caused by the accidental take of species on farms and ranches that occurs in the course of "routine and ongoing" agricultural activities. The bill had a five year sunset provision. This provision is now codified at Section 2087 of the code. CONTINUED SB 1303 Page 2 Separately, in section 2086 of the Fish and Game Code, SB 231 also established a new voluntary habitat management program for farmers and ranchers that depends in large part on the development of best management practices that are developed locally and approved by the department. That section, among other things, requires farmers and ranchers to avoid and minimize take of listed species, to develop programs based on the best available scientific information, and contains other criteria as well. The voluntary habitat management program has a separate provision for the incidental take of protected species occurring from routine and ongoing agricultural activities. However, it is only the free-standing accidental take provision (the one not tied to the voluntary habitat management program) that is codified in section 2087, that has a sunset provision, and would be affected by this bill. SB 231 required DFG to develop regulations to implement its provisions. Those regulations defined "routine and ongoing agricultural activities" as a long list of enumerated agricultural activities as well as those activities that are performed "incidental to or in conjunction with" those farming operations, including the preparation for market, delivery to storage or to market, delivery to carriers for transportation, and all activities compatible with the Williamson Act. Excluded from the definition are conversions of agricultural lands to nonagricultural use, timber harvesting activities, or activities that intentionally reduce habitat to facilitate conversion to non-agricultural uses. Also, the conversion of rangeland to more intensive agricultural uses such as permanent crops is not considered a routing and ongoing agricultural This bill extends the accidental take provisions of the state endangered species act, from January 1, 2011, to January 1, 2012. FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: No SUPPORT : (Verified 5/5/10) SB 1303 Page 3 Agricultural Council of California Alliance of Western Milk Producers Association of California Water Agencies California Cattlemen's Association California Chamber of Commerce California Citrus Mutual California Cotton Ginners Association California Farm Bureau Federation California Grape and Tree Fruit League California Outdoor Heritage Alliance California State Association of Counties California Tomato Growers Association Kings River Conservation District Kings River Water Association Nisei Farmers League Regional Council of Rural Counties Resources Landowner's Coalition Solano County Water Agency Western Agricultural Processors Association Western Growers ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : According to a coalition that includes several agricultural organizations, the California Chamber of Commerce, and the California State Association of Counties, this bill will permit farmers and ranchers to produce food and fiber "without fear of penalties under the California Endangered Species Act if they accidentally take a species listed as candidate, threatened, or endangered." The coalition views the bill as providing an option for landowners not to use "scorched earth" farming practices and instead allows for habitat to develop as a part of agricultural practices. The coalition contends that CESA discourages farmers from creating habitat, since such habitat could potentially attract listed species, and thus triggering application of the state's endangered species regulations. DLW:CTW:nl 5/5/10 Senate Floor Analyses SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE **** END **** SB 1303 Page 4