BILL ANALYSIS SB 1303 Page 1 Date of Hearing: June 30, 2010 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Felipe Fuentes, Chair SB 1303 (Wolk) - As Amended: June 2, 2010 Policy Committee: Water, Parks and Wildlife Vote: 11-0 Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: No Reimbursable: No SUMMARY This bill extends the sunset of the "accidental take" exemption from the California Endangered Species Act (CESA) prohibition on taking of threatened or endangered species. Specifically, this bill: 1)Extends the sunset, to January 1, 2014, from January 1, 2011, of the exemption from CESA for accidental take of threatened or endangered species that occurs in the course of otherwise legal agricultural activity. 2)Authorizes the Department of Fish and Game (DFG) to approve applications from nonprofit organizations to conduct education and outreach promoting voluntary agricultural programs that encourage wildlife habitat. 3)Requires a participating nonprofit organization to file an annual report with DFG. FISCAL EFFECT 1)Potential minor savings from 2011-12 to 2013-14 to DFG from not having to enforce CESA prohibitions against farmers and ranchers who accidentally kill threatened or endangered species when conducting routine and ongoing agricultural activities. (GF or Fish and Game Preservation Fund.) 2)Minor, absorbable costs to DFG to review and approve applications from nonprofit organizations seeking to provide education and outreach, to review educational materials provided by these organizations, and to receive annual reports SB 1303 Page 2 from them. COMMENTS 1)Rationale . The author intends to allow farmers and ranchers to continue to provide wildlife habitat without fear of CESA violation. The author contends the extension of the CESA exemption is needed to encourage farmers and ranchers to undertake wildlife-friendly agricultural practices, which provide habitat that may attract threatened or endangered animals. The author reports that, absent the exemption, farmers and ranchers fear they will violate CESA-meaning they will kill threatened or endangered wildlife-in the normal course of agricultural activities. These fearful farmers and ranchers undertake agricultural practices that intentionally make their land inhospitable to wildlife, an outcome the author describes as counter to the overall goal of CESA. In addition, the author seeks to educate farmers and ranchers through outreach by nonprofit organizations on the state's voluntary programs that encourage wildlife-friendly farming practices. 2)Background . The California Endangered Species Act generally prohibits the "taking"-meaning the catching or killing-of wildlife species listed by the state as threatened or endangered. Existing law, however, makes certain exceptions to the CESA prohibition on taking threatened or endangered species. For example, the law allows the "accidental" take of threatened or endangered species that occurs in the course of normal, routine agricultural activity. This CESA exemption for accidental take will sunset on January 1, 2011, a date this bill seeks to extend to January 1, 2014. In addition, a separate section of law allows the "incidental" take of threatened or endangered species that occurs as part of otherwise legal activity, such as routine agricultural activity, on land that is part of the state's voluntary habitat management program. The bill does not address the incidental take exemption for land in the voluntary habitat management program and there is no sunset date for this exemption. There are conflicting views of the desirability of the accidental-take CESA exemption. Some farmers and ranchers contend the exemption allows them to undertake normal agricultural activities, without fear of CESA violation, that SB 1303 Page 3 may occur despite their best efforts to avoid harm to wildlife. Others contend the exemption discourages farmers and ranchers from participating in the state's voluntary habitat management program, which fosters wildlife habitat on agricultural land and provides incidental take CESA protection to farmers and ranchers. The bill represents a compromise: it extends the accidental take exemption for three years while providing for outreach and education to farmers and ranchers on the state's voluntary habitat management program, from which they may benefit. 3)Related Legislation . a) Chapter 87, Statutes of 1997 (SB 231, Costa) created the CESA exemption for accidental take of threatened or endangered species on farms and ranches that occurs in the course of routine and ongoing agricultural activities, to sunset in five years from enactment. b) Chapter 32, Statutes of 2002, (SB 550, Costa) extended the accidental-take CESA exemption sunset to January 1, 2009. c) Chapter 82, Statutes of 2008 (SB 1436, Ducheny) , extended the accidental-take CESA exemption sunset to January 1, 2011. d) Chapter 184, Statutes of 2009 (SB 448, Pavley) authorizes DFG to enter into a voluntary "safe harbor agreement" with a landowner for the protection of species that are listed as threatened or endangered under CESA. Such agreements allow taking incidental to an otherwise lawful activity, including agricultural activity. 4)Support. This bill is supported by numerous agricultural and industry organizations. 5)There is no registered opposition to this bill. Analysis Prepared by : Jay Dickenson / APPR. / (916) 319-2081