BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 1394
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:  August 23, 2010

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION
                               Bonnie Lowenthal, Chair
                    SB 1394 (Kehoe) - As Amended:  August 18, 2010

           SENATE VOTE  :  34-0
           
          SUBJECT  :  Driver's license reexamination 

           SUMMARY  :  Repeals the sunset dates on statutes authorizing the  
          reexamination of certain licensed drivers of motor vehicles.   
          Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Requires the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to check the  
            record of a driver's license (DL) applicant for traffic  
            convictions, accidents, lapse-of-consciousness (LOC) reports,  
            reports of inability to operate a vehicle received from family  
            members, and notices of re-examination issued by traffic  
            officers, prior to issuing or renewing a license.  

          2)Requires DMV to check the record of a DL applicant for notices  
            of failure to appear in court prior to issuing or renewing a  
            license and to withhold or not issue a license to an applicant  
            who has violated his or her written promise to appear unless  
            the case has been adjudicated or the applicant's record is  
            cleared.  

          3)Allows DMV to remove and destroy notices of failure to appear,  
            failure to pay a fine, or failure to obey a court order, that  
            have been on file for five or more years.  

          4)Requires DMV to reexamine a person's ability to operate a  
            motor vehicle (i.e., administer a road test) upon receipt of a  
            request for a reexamination from a traffic officer or a report  
            from a local health officer that the person has a disorder  
            characterized by LOCs.  

          5)Requires DMV to reexamine a person's ability to operate a  
            motor vehicle and determine whether that person's driving  
            privilege should be suspended or revoked upon receiving  
            information from a family member that the person cannot safely  
            operate a motor vehicle.  
           
           EXISTING LAW  :  Includes the above-described requirements but  








                                                                  SB 1394
                                                                  Page  2

          repeals them effective January 1, 2011.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown.  

           COMMENTS  :  SB 335 (Hayden), Chapter 985, Statutes of 2000, was  
          introduced in response to of a number of deaths at that time  
          involving older and infirm drivers.  It was named for Brandi  
          Mitock, a 15-year-old girl who was killed when a 96-year-old man  
          hit her with his car while she was walking in a crosswalk in  
          Santa Monica.  Another high profile accident occurred when an  
          85-year-old man hit and killed a police officer in Lodi.  This  
          police officer had earlier requested that DMV re-examine the  
          85-year-old man's driving ability.  After receiving reports from  
          his doctor and interviewing him over the telephone, DMV did not  
          revoke or suspend his driver's license.  

          According to the author of this bill, it is needed "to remove  
          the sunset clauses on four sections of the Vehicle Code that  
          were created by SB 335 that directed DMV on how to conduct  
          specified driver's license re-exams.  SB 335 contained  
          provisions that had a 10-year sunset.  These included provisions  
          on how the DMV is to re-examine drivers whose doctors have  
          alerted the DMV of specified medical conditions as well as the  
          clause that allows family members to notify the DMV of driving  
          problems of their loved one.  Prompted by a constituent issue,  
          Senator Kehoe reviewed SB 335 and believes that after 10 years  
          of DMV administering these code sections, they continue to  
          remain important for the public health and welfare for all  
          drivers.  Therefore these sunsets should be repealed."  

          DMV generally concurs that SB 335 has strengthened procedures  
          for screening out potentially dangerous drivers.  They point  
          out, however, that the most meaningful screening for LOC  
          patients is a medical evaluation and interview of the driver,  
          rather than a road test.  Administering a road test to every  
          individual who is reported to have experienced a seizure or  
          blackout may be excessive and potentially wasteful of DMV  
          resources.  In most cases, these are individuals whose medical  
          fitness is in question, rather than their driving skills.   
          Reviewing the driver's medical history, the medications he or  
          she is taking, and the prognosis for future episodes are likely  
          more predictive of possible problems than his or her performance  
          on a 30-minute road test.  

           Suggested committee amendment  :  In order to provide sufficient  








                                                                  SB 1394
                                                                  Page  3

          time for the Legislature to consider the best approach to  
          evaluating the ability of LOC patients to operate motor  
          vehicles, the Committee may wish to simply extend by one year,  
          rather than completely repealing, the sunset date on the current  
          mandate that these individuals be subject to a road test.  This  
          would allow for a deliberative process during the next  
          legislative session in the crafting of an appropriate policy.  

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :

           Support 
           
          None on file
           
          Opposition 
           
          None on file

           
          Analysis Prepared by  :   Howard Posner / TRANS. / (916) 319-2093