BILL ANALYSIS SB 1456 SENATE COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Senator S. Joseph Simitian, Chairman 2009-2010 Regular Session BILL NO: SB 1456 AUTHOR: Simitian AMENDED: March 23, 2010 FISCAL: No HEARING DATE: April 5, 2010 URGENCY: Yes CONSULTANT: Randy Pestor SUBJECT : CEQA MEDIATION PROCEEDINGS SUMMARY : Existing law : 1) Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): a) Requires lead agencies with the principal responsibility for carrying out or approving a proposed discretionary project to prepare a negative declaration, mitigated declaration, or environmental impact report (EIR) for this action, unless the project is exempt from CEQA (CEQA includes various statutory exemptions, as well as categorical exemptions in the CEQA guidelines). (Public Resources Code 21000 et seq.). b) Requires challenges to CEQA determinations to be commenced within specified periods (e.g., 30 days of an agency's filing of a notice of determination, 35 days of an agency's filing of a notice of exemption) (21167). No later than 20 days from the date of service upon a public agency, the public agency must file a notice with the court setting a time and place for all parties to meet and attempt to settle the litigation. The settlement meeting may be continued from time to time without postponing or otherwise delaying other applicable litigation time limits, and the settlement meeting is intended to be conducted concurrently with any judicial proceeding (21167.8). 2) Under the Mediation and Resolution of Land Use Disputes Law (Government Code 66030 et seq.): SB 1456 Page 2 a) Authorizes an action brought in superior court relating to certain subjects (e.g., CEQA, general plan and zoning, redevelopment plans) to be subject to mediation in accordance with the Law. The court may invite parties to consider resolving their dispute by selecting a mutually acceptable person, organization, or agency to serve as mediator, and certain time limits are specified. (66031). b) Requires all time limits with respect to an action to be tolled while the mediator conducts the mediation, and any action taken regarding mediation must be taken in accordance with current law. (66032). This bill : 1) Under CEQA, clarifies that mediation proceedings under the Mediation and Resolution of Land Use Disputes Law is intended to be conducted concurrently with any judicial proceeding. 2) Contains an urgency clause. COMMENTS : 1) Purpose of Bill . CEQA requires a settlement meeting after an action or proceeding alleging that a public agency has not complied with certain matters relating to CEQA. The Mediation and Resolution of Land Use Disputes Law authorizes an action brought in superior court relating to certain matters, including CEQA, to be subject to mediation in accordance with the Law. While CEQA provides that a settlement meeting is intended to be conducted concurrently with any judicial proceedings, the Mediation and Resolution of Land Use Disputes Law provides that time limits with respect to an action are to be tolled while the mediator conducts the mediation. The purpose of SB 1456 is to clarify under CEQA that a mediation proceeding in accordance with the Mediation and SB 1456 Page 3 Resolution of Land Use Disputes Law, like a CEQA settlement meeting, is intended to be conducted concurrently with any judicial proceeding. This clarification is helpful because CEQA requires all courts in which an action or proceeding under CEQA is pending to give that action or proceeding preference over all other civil actions, in the matter of setting the action or proceeding for hearing or trial, and in hearing or trying the action or proceeding, so that the action or proceeding is quickly heard and determined. 2) Related legislation . SB 894 (Committee on Local Government) contains a cross reference to the Mediation and Resolution of Land Use Disputes Law in each of the affected provisions referenced in the Law, including a cross reference in CEQA to that Law (adding Public Resources Code 21167.9). Further clarification may be necessary to ensure that the tolling provisions in this Law do not override the provisions of SB 1456. 3) Other issues to consider . Since there may be value to mediation as an opportunity to avoid litigation, it may be helpful for the author to consider ways to encourage mediation to resolve CEQA conflicts prior to challenges involving CEQA determinations. SOURCE : Senator Simitian SUPPORT : None on file OPPOSITION : None on file