BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  SB 1483|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                    CONSENT


          Bill No:  SB 1483
          Author:   Senate Governmental Organization Committee
          Amended:  As introduced
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE GOVERNMENTAL ORG. COMMITTEE  :  7-0, 4/27/10
          AYES:  Wright, Denham, Florez, Negrete McLeod, Price,  
            Wyland, Yee
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Harman, Calderon, Oropeza, Padilla


           SUBJECT  :    Indian gaming

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill clarifies references in the Government  
          Code relative to the definition of "eligible recipient  
          Indian tribes."

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law creates the Indian Gaming Special  
          Distribution Fund (SDF) in the State Treasury for the  
          deposit of monies from specified gaming tribes pursuant to  
          the terms of the 1999 tribal-state gaming compacts.  A  
          portion of the monies from the SDF are available for  
          appropriation by the Legislature, on a quarterly basis, for  
          the backfill of shortfalls in the RSTF.  Existing law  
          specifies that the first priority use of SDF monies is the  
          backfill of shortfalls in the RSTF.

          Existing law creates the RSTF within the State Treasury for  
          the deposit of monies from tribal-state gaming compacts for  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1483
                                                                Page  
          2

          the purpose of making distributions to non-compact and  
          non-gaming tribes, as specified.

          Existing law requires the California Gambling Control  
          Commission to determine the aggregate amount of shortfalls  
          in RSTF and to provide certain legislative committees an  
          estimate of the amount needed to backfill that fund such  
          that each eligible recipient tribe will receive $1.1  
          million for the fiscal year.

          This bill:

          1.Strikes reference to "Section 4.3.2(a)(i)" of the 1999  
            Model Tribal-State Gaming Compacts (compacts) that  
            defines the term, "noncompact tribe".

          2.Replaces the stricken language with the actual definition  
            of noncompact tribe found in all compacts.

          3.Makes other technical and conforming changes.  

          This bill is a technical clean-up measure that corrects  
          references to "eligible recipient Indian tribes" in  
          existing law.

          Noncompact tribes are defined in Tribal-State Gaming  
          Compacts as "federally-recognized Indian tribes that  
          operate fewer than 350 gaming devices".  Noncompact tribes  
          are eligible for distributions of $1.1 million a year from  
          the RSTF.

          In the 1999 model compacts negotiated by the Davis  
          administration, the definition of "noncompact tribes" is  
          found in compact Section 4.3.2(a)(i).  In newer compacts  
          concluded and ratified under the Schwarzenegger  
          administration, the definition of "noncompact tribes" is  
          located in other compact sections, such as Section 5.1(c)  
          of the Coyote Valley Compact and the Fort Mojave Indian  
          Tribe Compact, among others.  

          To eliminate any ambiguity in the law [Government Code  
          Section 12012.90], SB 1483 replaces the reference to  
          "eligible recipient Indian tribes" defined in "Compact  
          Section 4.3.2(a)(i)" with the actual definition of  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1483
                                                                Page  
          3

          "eligible recipient Indian tribes" common to all compacts,  
          namely, "federally-recognized Indian tribes that operate  
          fewer than 350 gaming devices."

           Prior Legislation  

          AB 1740 (Governmental Organization), 2007-2008 Legislative  
          Session, clarifies references in the Government Code  
          related to "eligible recipient Indian tribes" as it relates  
          to the distribution of RSTF monies.  (Died on the Assembly  
          Inactive File.)

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  No    
          Local:  No

          TSM:nl  4/28/10   Senate Floor Analyses 

                       SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  NONE RECEIVED

                                ****  END  ****

























                                                           CONTINUED