BILL ANALYSIS ----------------------------------------------------------------- | | | SENATE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES AND WATER | | Senator Fran Pavley, Chair | | 2009-2010 Regular Session | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- BILL NO: SB 1488 HEARING DATE: April 13, 2010 AUTHOR: Natural Resources and WaterURGENCY: No VERSION: As introduced CONSULTANT: Katharine Moore DUAL REFERRAL: No FISCAL: Yes SUBJECT: State lands: tidelands and submerged lands. BACKGROUND AND EXISTING LAW This is the State Lands Commission (SLC) omnibus committee bill. The SLC exercises the state's ongoing oversight authority over all of the state's public trust lands. These include filled and unfilled tide and other submerged lands as well as the beds of navigable rivers, lakes and streams. These lands cannot be bought or sold but the state's administrative authority to manage them may be granted by the Legislature to local agencies, subject to the public trust, for specific uses of statewide benefit. The public trust is a set of guiding principles that direct the state to hold its title to public trust lands in a manner to protect the public's interest in activities that are typically water dependent or related. While continually evolving to meet changing public needs, these activities include, for example, navigation, commerce, fishing, recreation and environmental protection. The Legislature has been making grants of these lands since the state's inception. In 2006, the City of Pittsburg sponsored AB 2324 (Canciamilla, c. 275, Stats. 2006) which replaced several existing legislative grants of tide and other submerged lands to the city with a single grant subject to the public trust and certain other provisions. Pittsburg sought the legislation in order to simplify the development plans of its port, speed clean-up of contaminated industrial areas, boost its economic growth and create jobs. The SLC is also the trustee of the Land Bank Fund (LBF) created 1 pursuant to the Kapiloff Land Bank Act of 1982. There are certain restrictions on the LBF's operation. The LBF may receive funds from: Title settlements which may be used to purchase specific LBF parcels and the conveyance of those interests to the state, Project applicants for the purposes of mitigation, and Any party for projects to provide for the management and improvement of real property held by the SLC to provide open space, habitat and public access. PROPOSED LAW This bill would modify the Public Resources Code to: i. Require a survey of the trust lands granted to the City of Pittsburg in 2006 be completed by January 1, 2013 and exclude Brown's Island from the same grant. ii. Allow the Land Bank Fund to be used to create access to public trust lands. 2 ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT The proposed bill addresses two items of concern to the State Lands Commission which, if passed, will improve its ability to meet its public land management and resource protection goals. ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION None received COMMENTS Changes needed in the grant of public tidelands and submerged lands to the City of Pittsburg: No survey was required in the grant to the City of Pittsburg provided that it "established a metes and bounds description of the trustee's corporate water boundaries." This was atypical and the grant boundaries have not yet been reported. The new survey requirement will force the boundaries to be assessed and reported to the SLC. After the grant was made, subsequent discussions between the City of Pittsburg and the SLC revealed that Brown's Island - which is partly under the jurisdiction of the Port of Stockton - should not have been included. The rationale to expand eligibility for Land Bank Fund projects: In some instances, the best way to improve trust lands is to allow the public to access them in order to participate in water-related recreation, navigation and other trust activities. Access to the trust lands may be provided by, for example, the addition of a wheelchair ramp, staircase, path or trail, among other methods. Often these improvements have to be built on non-trust lands, such as the land between a road and a beach. It is not clear that LBF funds can be spent on projects located on non-trust lands. In order to address this obstacle, the proposed change in the law broadens project eligibility to include "access to." This would allow, for example, the SLC to use LBF funds to build a stairway from an upland road to a beach on trust lands in partnership with the owner of the non-trust lands (typically a public entity). The SLC has assured staff that it is interested only in cooperative projects with non-trust land owners and will not assert eminent domain (existing law prohibits the use of eminent domain under the Kapiloff Land Bank Act (see PRC 8620)). SUPPORT State Lands Commission OPPOSITION None Received 3 4