BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                      



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                    AB 16|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 16
          Author:   Perea (D)
          Amended:  As introduced
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMMITTEE  :  7-2, 6/28/11
          AYES:  DeSaulnier, Huff, Kehoe, Lowenthal, Pavley, Rubio, 
            Simitian
          NOES:  Gaines, Harman

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  Senate Rule 28.8

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  57-19, 6/2/11 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    High-Speed Rail Authority

           SOURCE  :     California Labor Federation 


           DIGEST  :    This bill encourages the California High-Speed 
          Rail Authority to acquire equipment manufactured in 
          California.

           ANALYSIS :    In November 2008, California voters approved 
          Proposition 1A, the Safe, Reliable High-Speed Passenger 
          Train Bond Act for the 21st Century of 2008 (Proposition 
          1A).  The $9.95 billion bond measure provides $950 million 
          for improving conventional rail services connecting to the 
          high-speed rail line and $9 billion for high-speed rail 
          development.  Of the remaining $9 billion, $900 million is 
          for the project's planning, environmental analysis, and 
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                 AB 16
                                                                Page 
          2

          preliminary engineering.  Proposition 1A limits the 
          expenditure of the $8 billion available for construction to 
          not more than 50 percent of the cost of building the 
          systems.  Proposition 1A identifies the Phase I corridor 
          for high-speed rail as an alignment from the San Francisco 
          Transbay Terminal to the Los Angeles Union State and 
          Anaheim via the San Joaquin Valley.  The High-Speed Rail 
          Authority (Authority) estimates the total cost of Phase I 
          to be between $43 and $65 billion. 

          Proposition 1A defines the capital cost for which bond 
          revenues may be used to include acquisition of property, 
          acquisition and construction of tracks, structures, power 
          systems, and stations; acquisition of train equipment; 
          mitigation of direct and indirect environmental impacts; 
          relocation assistance; and other related capital 
          facilities, including financing and refinancing if 
          authorized by a subsequent statute.  It also authorizes the 
          Authority to contract for services and equipment for 
          developing and operating the high-speed train service.

          In January 2010, the Authority received an American 
          Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) grant of $2.25 billion 
          to aid in the development of the Phase I project.  Of that 
          amount, $400 million is for constructing the basement of 
          the new Transbay Terminal in San Francisco to accommodate 
          high-speed trains.  According to the Federal Railroad 
          Administration's (FRA) announcement of its ARRA award, the 
          remaining $1.85 billion is for purchasing right-of-way, 
          constructing track, signaling systems, and stations, and 
          completing environmental reviews and engineering documents 
          for the Los Angeles/Anaheim segment, the San Francisco/San 
          Jose segment, the Fresno/Bakersfield segment, and the 
          Merced/Fresno segment.  In a second round of federal 
          funding the Authority received approximately $1.3 billion, 
          and in a third round of funding, the Authority received 
          $300 million from funds declined by Florida.  The Authority 
          and FRA jointly selected a segment from near Fresno to near 
          Bakersfield as the first construction segment.  Between 
          federal funds and state bond funds, the Authority has 
          committed about $5.7 billion for the Central Valley 
          project.  As a condition of the ARRA grants, the Authority 
          must complete construction by September 30, 2017.


                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                 AB 16
                                                                Page 
          3

          ARRA prohibits the use of grant funds for a project 
          involving the construction, alteration, maintenance, or 
          repair of a public building or public facility, unless all 
          of the iron, steel, and manufactured goods used in the 
          project are produced in the United States.  In addition, it 
          requires that this prohibition be applied in a manner 
          consistent with U.S. obligations under international 
          agreements pertaining to procurement.  Lastly, Authority 
          establishes conditions for waivers of these requirements. 

          This bill authorizes the Authority to make "every effort" 
          to purchase high-speed rail equipment manufactured in 
          California, provided it is consistent with federal law.

           Comments
           
          Following the statewide voter approval of Proposition 1A 
          authorizing $9 billion for the development of a high-speed 
          rail system in California, the Authority is transitioning 
          from a small study and planning organization to a 
          multi-billion dollar engineering and construction entity.  
          The Authority may soon be tasked to approve major purchases 
          of train rolling stock and equipment.  This bill imposes a 
          requirement upon the Authority to try to buy California 
          manufactured rolling stock and equipment.

          California workers have reason to be concerned that 
          high-speed rail manufacturing may otherwise be outsourced.  
          Foreign firms are lobbying hard to secure work from the 
          Authority.   Foreign firms are lobbying hard to secure work 
          from the Authority.  China, for example, has announced 
          plans to build United States high-speed train lines and is 
          steeping up exports of its rail technology.  French, 
          Spanish, and Japanese firms have also indicted their 
          interests in securing contracts with the Authority.

           Prior/Related Legislation
           
          AB 492 (Galgiani), authorizes the Authority to consider, to 
          the extent permitted by federal and state law, the creation 
          of jobs in California when awarding major contracts or 
          purchasing high-speed trains.

          AB 1830 (Galgiani), of 2009-10 Session, was identical to 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                 AB 16
                                                                Page 
          4

          this bill.  It passed Legislature but was vetoed by 
          Governor Schwarzenegger who wrote:  "While I support job 
          creation in the state, this bill could result in 
          unnecessary additional costs and delays in the construction 
          on high-speed rail in California and for this reason I am 
          unable to sign it."

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes   
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  7/13/11)

          California Labor Federation (source)


           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    The sponsor of this bill, the 
          California Labor Federation, asserts that, "As construction 
          progresses, California will need to contract with a company 
          to purchase a new high-speed trains.  Currently all 
          high-speed rail manufacturers are located overseas.  But 
          California has an opportunity to use public dollars to 
          attract new manufacturers to California to build high-speed 
          rail trains here creating new jobs and a new industry."


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 
          AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Atkins, Beall, Bill 
            Berryhill, Block, Blumenfield, Bonilla, Bradford, 
            Brownley, Buchanan, Butler, Charles Calderon, Campos, 
            Carter, Cedillo, Chesbro, Davis, Dickinson, Eng, Feuer, 
            Fong, Fuentes, Furutani, Galgiani, Gatto, Gordon, 
            Hayashi, Roger Hernández, Hill, Huber, Hueso, Huffman, 
            Jeffries, Lara, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, Mendoza, Mitchell, 
            Monning, Nestande, Olsen, Pan, Perea, V. Manuel Pérez, 
            Portantino, Skinner, Smyth, Solorio, Swanson, Torres, 
            Wieckowski, Williams, Yamada, John A. Pérez
          NOES: Conway, Cook, Donnelly, Fletcher, Beth Gaines, 
            Garrick, Grove, Hagman, Harkey, Jones, Knight, Logue, 
            Mansoor, Morrell, Nielsen, Norby, Silva, Valadao, Wagner
          NO VOTE RECORDED: Gorell, Halderman, Hall, Miller


          JJA:do  7/13/11   Senate Floor Analyses 


                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                 AB 16
                                                                Page 
          5

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****
          









































                                                           CONTINUED