BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 42
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 11, 2011

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                    AB 42 (Huffman) - As Amended:  March 17, 2011 

          Policy Committee:                              Water, Parks and 
          Wildlife     Vote:                            13-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program: 
          No     Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          This bill authorizes the Department of Parks and Recreation 
          (DPR) to enter into agreements with nonprofit organizations for 
          development, improvement, restoration, care, maintenance, 
          administration or operation of state parks.  Specifically, as 
          proposed to be amended, this bill:

          1)Authorizes DPR to enter into agreements with qualified 
            nonprofit organizations for development, improvement, 
            restoration, care, maintenance, administration or operation of 
            state parks if doing so would enable the department to avoid 
            closure of a unit or units of the state park system. 

          2)Limits to 20 the number of park units for which the department 
            may enter into an agreement for operation of an entire park 
            unit.

          3)Requires an operating agreement for a park unit to honor 
            existing concession agreements for that park unit.

          4)Requires a nonprofit that enters into such an agreement to 
            report annually to the department and requires the department 
            to report to the Legislature biennially.  

          5)Specifies that all revenue generated by a park is to be spent 
            only on the maintenance, improvement or operation of the park.

          6)Sunsets the bill's provisions as of January 1, 2019.

           FISCAL EFFECT  









                                                                  AB 42
                                                                  Page  2

          Unknown GF savings to operate state park units.  The authority 
          provided by the bill is discretionary.  Presumably, DPR will not 
          enter into agreements with nonprofits for the operation of state 
          park units unless the cost to do so would be no more than equal 
          to the cost to DPR to operate the park units itself.

           COMMENTS  

           1)Rationale.   The author contends the operating agreements 
            authorized by this bill may help maintain public access to 
            state parks until a permanent state parks funding source is 
            secured.

           2)Background.   California's state park system is the largest in 
            the nation and includes 278 state parks covering over 1.5 
            million acres of lands managed by the Department of Parks and 
            Recreation.  In recent years, support for the state park 
            system declined and user fees increased.  The Legislative 
            Analyst reports an average annual shortfall of $120 million 
            for ongoing maintenance and operation of state parks, 
            resulting in $1.3 billion in deferred maintenance.

            The 2011-12 Governor's Budget proposes an $11 million 
            reduction in GF support to DPR and anticipates an additional 
            $11 million GF reduction in 2012-13, for an ongoing annual GF 
            budget reduction to DPR of $22 million.  It is anticipated the 
            funding reductions will result in the full or partial closure 
            of a number of state parks.

           3)Proposed Amendments.   The author has proposed amendments to 
            the bill to:  

              a)   Specify DPR may enter into agreements described only if 
               doing so will enable to department to avoid closure of a 
               unit or units of the state park system.  

              b)   Limit to 20 the number of park units for which the 
               department may enter into an agreement for operation of an 
               entire park unit.  

             c)   Require an operating agreement for a park unit to honor 
               existing concession agreements for that park unit.  

              d)   Define a qualified nonprofit organization as one that 
               qualifies for exemption from taxation pursuant to the 








                                                                  AB 42
                                                                  Page  3

               Internal Revenue Code and has as its principal purpose 
               providing park visitor and related services.  

              e)   Sunset the bill's provisions as of January 1, 2019.  

          4)Support.  The bill is supported by numerous park supporters and 
            advocates.  

          5)There is no registered opposition to this bill.
           
           Analysis Prepared by  :    Jay Dickenson / APPR. / (916) 319-2081