BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 26 X1 Page 1 CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS AB 26 X1 (Budget Committee) As Amended June 15, 2011 Majority vote. Budget Bill Appropriation Takes Effect Immediately ----------------------------------------------------------------- |ASSEMBLY: | |(June 3, 2011) |SENATE: |21-15|(June 15, | | | | | | |2011) | ----------------------------------------------------------------- (vote not relevant) SUMMARY : Makes various changes to state laws to implement provisions relating to redevelopment in the 2011-12 budget agreement and is the first of two budget trailer bills that address redevelopment agencies (RDAs). This bill eliminates redevelopment agencies and directs the resolution of their activities. The second bill, SB 15 X1 or AB 27 X1, creates an alternative voluntary redevelopment program. This bill would not become effective unless the second bill also becomes effective. The requirements of this bill would affect RDAs that elect not to participate in the alternative voluntary redevelopment program. The Senate amendments delete the Assembly version of this bill, and instead: Addresses the suspension of RDA activities; dissolution of existing RDAs; establishment and duties of Successor Agencies; establishment and duties of Oversight Boards; use of property tax revenues that would otherwise have gone to RDAs and other matters described below. Existing Redevelopment Agencies: RDAs would no longer exist under the provisions of the bill as of October 1, 2011 and would be dissolved as of that date. In addition, as of the effective date of the adoption of this legislation, activities of RDAs would be curtailed, and an orderly wind-down process instituted for redevelopment activities. Specifically: 1)Prohibit, as part of the process of reducing RDAs activity prior to their elimination, an RDA from: a) issuing new or expanded debt of any type (except emergency refunding bonds, under certain conditions); AB 26 X1 Page 2 b) making loans or advances or grants or entering into agreements to provide funds or financial assistance; c) executing new or additional contracts, obligations or commitments; d) amending existing agreements or commitments; e) selling or otherwise disposing of existing assets; f) acquiring real property for any purpose by any means; g) transferring or assigning any assets, rights or powers to any entity; h) accepting financial assistance from any public or private source that is contingent on the issuance of debt; i) adopting or amending redevelopment plans or making new findings with respect to blight; j) entering into new partnerships, imposing new assessments, or increasing staff or compensation; and, aa) other actions that would result in ongoing commitments or a depletion of assets. 2)Require RDAs to continue to make all scheduled payments for enforceable obligations (described below), perform obligations established pursuant to enforceable obligations, set aside required reserves, preserve assets, cooperate with Successor Agencies (described below), and to take all measures to avoid triggering a default under an enforceable obligation. Would also require the RDAs to prepare an enforceable obligation payments schedule, containing all payments obligated to be made and provide this to the county auditor-controller within 60 days of the effective date of this bill. This schedule would be reviewed by the county auditor-controller, the State Controller and the Department of Finance. The bill would require that unencumbered RDA funds be conveyed to the county auditor-controller for distribution to the taxing entities in the county, including cities, counties, a city and a county, school districts and special districts. 3)Extend the time period allowed for challenges to the validity of an RDA's bonds or other obligations or to agency and legislative AB 26 X1 Page 3 body determinations and findings issued or adopted after January 1, 2011. These challenges could be brought two years following approval of the action, as opposed to the current 60 day and 90 day review periods. 4)Require the county auditor-controller to complete a financial audit of each RDA in the county by March 1, 2012, in order to establish each agency's assets, liabilities, pass-through payment obligations to other taxing entities, the amount and terms of indebtedness, and to certify the initial Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (defined below). The audits are to be submitted to the State Controller by March 15, 2012. Successor Agencies: Successor Agencies would be established under the bill and would typically be the city, county, or city and county that established the RDA. Each Successor Agency would be responsible for maintaining payments on enforceable obligations. Specifically: 1)Establish Successor Agencies to the RDAs that would, except in certain situations, such as those involving an RDA based on a joint powers authority, be the entity that created the redevelopment agency. If no local agency elects to be the Successor Agency, a designated local authority would be formed, whose three members would be appointed by the Governor. 2)Require Successor Agencies to make payments on legally enforceable obligations using property tax revenues when no other funding source is available or when payment from property tax revenues is required by an enforceable obligation. Successor Agencies would be responsible for preparing on a semi-annual basis the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule that would set forth a schedule of obligated payments including the date, amount, and source of funds for each payment. 3)Require the Successor Agencies' Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule to be certified by an external auditor approved by the county auditor-controller, and approved by the Oversight Board (as described below), the State Controller and the Department of Finance. The first Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule would be submitted by December 15, 2011, with a draft of the schedule due November 1, 2011. The Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule would be established pursuant to the identification of enforceable obligations, which are obligations that were entered into by the RDA and are legally enforceable. AB 26 X1 Page 4 4)Define enforceable obligations for Successor Agencies to include, but not limited to: a) bonds, including debt service, reserves, or other required payments; b) loans borrowed by the agency for a lawful purpose including loans from the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund; c) payments required by the federal government; d) pre-existing obligations to the state or obligations imposed by state law; e) legally enforceable payments to agencies' employees, including pension obligations and other obligations conferred through a collective bargaining agreement; f) judgments and settlements entered into by a court or arbitration, retaining appeal rights; g) legally binding contracts that do not violate the debt limit or public policy; and, h) contracts necessary for administration of the agency, such as for office space, equipment and supplies, to the extent permitted. Enforceable obligations would not include any agreements, contracts, or arrangements between the city, county, or city and county that created the RDA and the former RDA. 5)Require Successor Agencies to take control of all assets, properties, contracts, books and records, buildings and equipment of the RDAs on October 1, 2011. Successor Agencies are to dispose of RDAs' assets as directed by the Oversight Board with the proceeds transferred to the county auditor-controller for distribution to taxing agencies within the county. Governmental facilities, such as roads, school buildings, and fire or police stations would be conveyed to the appropriate public jurisdiction. The bill would require the Successor Agencies to compensate the taxing agencies for the value of property and assets retained by the Successor Agencies in an amount proportional to the taxing agencies' share of the AB 26 X1 Page 5 property tax. The value of any assets retained by the Successor Agencies would be at market value as determined by the county assessor for the 2011 property tax lien date, unless some other agreement is reached between the parties. 6)Authorize the Successor Agencies to prepare for the Oversight Board a proposed administrative budget that includes estimated administrative expenses, proposed sources of payment and proposals for services to be provided, but does not include funding for retained development projects, which must be funded from the Successor Agency's own budget. Oversight Boards: Oversight Boards established under the bill would be required to approve various actions by the Successor Agencies, including the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule and various other activities outlined below. Specifically: 1)Establish a seven-member Oversight Board for each Successor Agency that would generally consist of the following representatives: i) one member appointed by the County Board of Supervisors; ii) one member appointed by the mayor of the city that formed the RDA; iii) one member appointed by the largest special district; iv) one member appointed by the county superintendent of education; v) one member appointed by the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges; vi) one member of the public appointed by the county board of supervisors; and, vii) one member appointed by the mayor or the chair of the board of supervisors from the largest representative employee organization of the former RDA. Special appointment rules would apply if a county, county and city, or joint powers authority formed the RDA. Beginning July 1, 2016, one Oversight Board will be formed in each county. 2)Require Oversight Boards to approve the following actions of the Successor Agencies: a) establishment of new repayment terms for outstanding loans where such terms have not been established prior to July 1, 2011; b) issuance of refunding bonds; c) set-aside of reserves as required by bond indentures; AB 26 X1 Page 6 d) merger of project areas; e) acceptance of federal or state grants that are conditioned upon the provision of matching funds in an amount greater than 5%; f) retention of RDA properties by city, county or city and county; g) establishment of the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule; h) requests to hold portions of moneys in the housing fund in order to pay recognized obligations related to housing; and, i) requests to pledge or enter into an agreement for the pledge of property tax revenues to provide financing for an approved development project. 3)Require that the Oversight Boards direct the Successor Agencies to: a) dispose of all assets and properties except expeditiously and in a manner aimed at maximizing value; b) cease performance in connection with and terminate all existing agreements that do not qualify as enforceable obligations; c) transfer housing obligations and low and moderate set-aside funds to the applicable entity; d) terminate any agreement between the former RDA and any public entity in the county which obligates the former RDA to provide funding for debt service or other payments if in the best interest of the taxing entities; e) determine whether any contract, payments or agreements between the former RDA and private parties should be dissolved or renegotiated based on taxing entities best interests; and, f) submit repayment schedules for repayment of amounts borrowed from the housing fund. 4)Establish that all Oversight Board actions are subject to review AB 26 X1 Page 7 by the Department of Finance. The Department of Finance will notify the Oversight Board within 72 hours of the action that it wishes to review the decision. In the event the Department of Finance decides to review the action, it will have 10 days to either approve the action or return it to the Oversight Board for reconsideration. Property Tax Revenues: Property Tax Revenues that went to former RDAs would be used for the following purposes: continue pass-through payments to schools and local governments; fund outstanding former RDA debt and other enforceable obligations; and, provide funding for education and local governments. Specifically: 1)Create the Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund and the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund. Property tax revenues associated with each former RDA in each county will be deposited in the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund which will be administered by the county auditor-controller. Estimates of the amounts to be allocated and distributed from this account will be provided to the Department of Finance semi-annually. 2)Require the county auditor-controller to determine the amount of property tax increment that would have been allocated to each RDA and to deposit that amount in a Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund. The county auditor-controller is charged with administering this fund for the benefit of holders of agency debt and the taxing agencies that receive pass-through payments. 3)Require the county auditor-controller to allocate funds from the Redevelopment Property Tax Fund in the following order: a) Local agencies, school districts and community college districts in the amount that would have been received by such agencies as their share of the property tax base and that would have been paid pursuant to statutory and contractual pass-through agreements; b) Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund for Successor Agencies' payments listed in the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule and administration; and, c) Cities, the county, schools, community college districts, and non-enterprise special districts in the proportional shares of what would have been received absent redevelopment AB 26 X1 Page 8 and adjusted for pass-through agreements. Other Matters: 1)Allow for the continuation of housing activities by Successor Agencies, which would be permitted to assume responsibility for housing obligations and to use the existing balance in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund set-aside for these purposes. If a Successor Agency chooses not to assume the housing activity responsibilities, the funds would be transferred to the local housing authority or to the Department of Housing and Community Development. 2)Provide that the terms of existing memoranda of understanding with employee organizations representing former RDA employees would remain in force, unless a new agreement is reached. The Successor Agency will become the employer of all employees of the former RDA upon its dissolution and will assume all obligations under any existing memoranda of understanding then in force. 3)Specify that beginning for fiscal years 2012-13, the amounts of additional property tax received by school districts, county offices of education, charter schools and community college districts, as a result of the elimination of RDAs, would be in addition to the Proposition 98 minimum funding guarantee. These amounts (as well as amounts going to other taxing agencies) would increase over time as enforceable obligations expire. 4)Establish that if a community elects to participate in the alternative voluntary alternative redevelopment program established in SB 15 X1 or AB 27 X1, and later fails to comply with the provisions established in that bill governing the program, then the provisions of this bill apply with conforming changes to implementation and reporting dates. 5)Appropriate $500,000 to the Department of Finance for costs of administration under the legislation. 6)Adds an appropriation allowing this bill to take effect immediately upon enactment. AS PASSED BYTHE ASSEMBLY , this bill expresses the intent of the Legislature to enact statutory changes relating to the 2011 Budget Act. AB 26 X1 Page 9 FISCAL EFFECT : This legislation, together with SB 15 X1 or AB 27 X1, will result in $1.7 billion in additional funding as part of the 2011-12 Budget. COMMENTS : It is anticipated that cities and counties with RDAs would choose to participate in an alternative voluntary redevelopment program as set forth in SB 15 X1 and AB 27 X1. This alternative program would allow RDAs to continue but require that cities or counties within which RDAs are located to provide voluntary payments that would partially offset the use of property tax increment for RDA purposes. Analysis Prepared by : Mark Ibele / BUDGET / (916) 319-2099FN: 0001298