BILL NUMBER: AB 94	AMENDED
	BILL TEXT

	AMENDED IN SENATE  APRIL 11, 2011
	AMENDED IN SENATE  MARCH 16, 2011
	AMENDED IN SENATE  MARCH 14, 2011

INTRODUCED BY   Committee on Budget (Blumenfield (Chair), Alejo,
Allen, Brownley, Buchanan, Butler, Cedillo, Chesbro, Dickinson,
Feuer, Gordon, Huffman, Mitchell, Monning, and Swanson)

                        JANUARY 10, 2011

    An act to amend Sections 1240.3, 2550, 2558.46, 8201,
8208, 8263.1, 8263.4, 8354, 8357, 8447, 8499, 14041.5, 14041.6,
17070.766, 17463.7, 17584.1, 17587, 17592.71, 33128.3, 41203.1,
42238.146, 42605, 42606, 45023.1, 45023.4, 46201.2, 52124.3, 60200.7,
69432.7, 69432.9, 69433.6, 76243, 76300, 84043, and 84321.6 of, to
amend and renumber Section 60422.1 of, to add Sections 8263.2,
14041.65, 41204.3, 69433.2, and 84321.7 to, and to repeal and add
Section 41204.2 of, the Education Code, to amend Section 11323.2 of
the Welfare and Institutions Code, and to amend Items 6110-161-0001,
6110-485, and 6110-488 of Section 2.00 of the Budget Act of 2010
(Chapter 712 of the Statutes of 2010), relating to education finance,
making an   An act to amend Section 15820.917 of, and
to add   Section 15820.910 to, the Government Code, relating
to criminal justice realignment, making an  appropriation
therefor, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect
immediately, bill related to the budget.


	LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


   AB 94, as amended, Committee on Budget.  Education
finance: Budget Act of 2011.   Criminal justice
realignment.  
   Existing law authorizes the Department of Corrections and
Rehabilitation (CDCR), participating counties, and the State Public
Works Board (SPWB) to acquire, design, and construct local jail
facilities approved by the Corrections Standards Authority (CSA).
Existing law authorizes the SPWB to issue revenue bonds, notes, or
bond anticipation notes in specified amounts to finance the
acquisition, design, or construction, and a reasonable construction
reserve, of approved local jail facilities, as specified. Existing
law requires a minimum of 25% in county matching funds for projects
funded under these provisions and requires the CDCR and CSA to give
funding preference to counties that assist the state in siting
reentry facilities, as specified. AB 111 of the 2011-12 Regular
Session, if it becomes operative, instead requires that the CDCR and
the CSA give funding preference to counties that committed the
largest percentage of inmates to state custody in relation to the
total inmate population of CDCR in 2010.  
   This bill would, if AB 111 of the 2011-12 Regular Session becomes
operative, authorize counties that have received a conditional award
under one specified jail facilities financing program to relinquish
that award and reapply for a conditional award under a separate
financing program, as specified. The bill would lower to 10% the
required county contribution and additionally require the CDCR and
CSA to give funding preference to those counties that relinquish
those specified local jail construction conditional awards and agree
to continue to assist the state in siting reentry facilities, as
specified. The bill would cap at $100,000,000 the amount a county may
receive in proceeds from SPWB's issuance of bonds, notes, or bond
anticipation notes under those specified provisions.  
   This bill would appropriate $1,000 from the General Fund to the
CDCR for purposes of state operations to be used by the CSA in the
2011-12 fiscal year.  
   This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as
an urgency statute and a bill providing for appropriations related to
the Budget Bill.  
   (1) Existing law requires the county superintendent of schools of
each county, among other specified duties, to make annual visits to
each school in his or her county to observe its operation and to
learn of its problems. Existing law requires that the priority
objective of those visits is the determination of whether each school
has sufficient textbooks, as defined. Existing law, until July 1,
2013, and for the 2008-09 to the 2012-13 fiscal years, inclusive,
describes what is meant by sufficient textbooks or instructional
materials for purposes of these visits by the county superintendent
of schools.  
   This bill would extend the operation of this provision by 2 fiscal
years, until July 1, 2015.  
   (2) Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction
to make specified computations to determine the amount to be
allocated for direct services and other purposes provided by county
superintendents of schools. Under this provision, in each of the
fiscal years from 2008-09 to 2012-13, inclusive, the units of average
daily attendance (ADA) are required to include the same amount of
ADA for classes for adults and regional occupational centers and
programs used in the calculation for the 2007-08 fiscal year.
 
   This bill would extend this provision to apply to the 2013-14 and
2014-15 fiscal years.  
   (3) Existing law requires a revenue limit to be calculated for
each county superintendent of schools, adjusted for various factors,
and reduced, as specified. Existing law reduces the revenue limit for
each county superintendent of schools for the 2010-11 fiscal year by
a deficit factor of 18.250%.  
   This bill would set the deficit factor for each county
superintendent of schools for the 2011-12 and 2012-13 fiscal years at
19.892%.  
   (4) The Child Care and Development Services Act, administered by
the State Department of Education, provides that children who are 13
years of age or younger and their parents are eligible, with certain
requirements, for child care and development services. 

   This bill would instead provide that children who are 10 years of
age or younger, children with exceptional needs, children 12 years of
age or younger who are recipients of child protective services or at
risk of abuse, neglect, or exploitation, children 12 years of age or
younger who are provided services during nontraditional hours,
children 12 years of age or younger who are homeless, and children
who are 11 and 12 years of age, as funding permits, as specified, are
eligible, with certain requirements, for child care and development
services.  
   (5) Existing law provides that the preferred placement for a child
who is 11 or 12 years of age and is otherwise eligible for
subsidized child care services is in a before or after school
program. Existing law requires contractors to report annually to the
State Department of Education the amount of savings resulting from
these provisions, as specified.  
   This bill would instead provide that a child who is 11 or 12 years
of age and who is otherwise eligible for subsidized child care and
development services, except for his or her age, shall be given first
priority for enrollment, and in cases of programs operating at full
capacity, first priority on the waiting list for a before or after
school program, as specified, and would require contractors to
provide each family of an otherwise eligible 11 or 12 year old child
with information about the availability of before and after school
programs located in the family's community. This bill would remove
provisions requiring contractors to report savings to the department.
 
   (6) Existing law provides that necessary supportive services shall
be available to every participant in the CalWORKs program, including
child care, as specified. Existing law provides that, to the extent
funds are available, paid child care shall be available to a
participant with a dependent child in the assistance unit who needs
paid child care if the child is 11 or 12 years of age. 

   This bill would remove the requirement that paid child care be
available to a participant for a child who is 11 or 12 years of age.
 
   (7) Existing law provides for income eligibility standards for
families to receive child care and development services. Existing law
provides that "income eligible," for the purposes of the Child Care
and Development Services Act, means that a family's adjusted monthly
income is at or below 75% of the state median income, adjusted for
family size, and adjusted annually.  
   This bill instead would provide that "income eligible," for the
purposes of the Child Care and Development Services Act, means that a
family's adjusted monthly income is at or below 70% of the state
median income, adjusted for family size, and adjusted annually.
 
   The bill would provide for the reduction of child care and
development services, and the disenrollment of specified families
from subsidized child care services, in accordance with prescribed
priorities.  
   (8) Existing law provides for 3 stages of child care for CalWORKs
recipients. Existing law provides that the 3rd stage of child care
begins when a funded child care space is available, and further
provides that CalWORKs recipients are eligible for this stage of
child care. Existing law also provides that persons who received a
lump-sum diversion payment or diversion services and former CalWORKs
participants are eligible if they have an income that does not exceed
75% of the state median income.  
   This bill instead would provide that persons who received a
lump-sum diversion payment or diversion services and former CalWORKs
participants are eligible if they have an income that does not exceed
70% of the state median income.  
   (9) Existing law requires the cost of state-funded child care
services to be governed by regional market rates and requires the
regional market rate ceilings to be established at the 85th
percentile of the 2005 regional market rate survey for that region.
Existing law prohibits reimbursement to license-exempt child care
providers from exceeding 80% of the family child care home rate
established pursuant to these provisions.  
   This bill would instead prohibit reimbursement to license-exempt
child care providers from exceeding 60% of the family child care home
rate, effective July 1, 2011.  
   The bill would adjust the family fee schedule that was in effect
for the 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11 fiscal years to reflect
income eligibility limits specified in this bill for the 2011-12
fiscal year. The bill would require the adjusted fee schedule to be
submitted to the Department of Finance for referral in order to be
implemented by July 1, 2011.  
   (10) Existing law limits the amount of specified revenue limit
apportionments that counts towards the minimum funding obligation for
the following fiscal year to $1,601,655,000.  
   This bill would decrease that amount to $1,101,655,000. 

   (11) Existing law requires the Controller to draw warrants on the
State Treasury in each month of each year in specified amounts for
principal apportionments for purposes of funding school districts,
county superintendents of schools, and community college districts.
Existing law defers the drawing of those warrants, as specified.
 
   This bill would defer additional specified amounts of the warrants
for school districts and county superintendents of schools from
April, May, and June to July, and from March and April to August. The
bill would make additional deferrals, from February to July, August,
and September, from April to September, and from May to September,
for the 2010-11 fiscal year only. 
   (12) The Leroy F. Greene School Facilities Act of 1998 requires
the State Allocation Board to require school districts applying for
funds under that act to deposit, into a specified account for ongoing
and major maintenance of school buildings, an amount equal to or
greater than 3% of the total general fund expenditures of the
applicant school district. Existing law, for the 2008-09 to the
2012-13 fiscal years, inclusive, reduces that deposit requirement to
an amount equal to 1% of the total general fund expenditures of the
applicant school district. Existing law exempts a school district
that maintains its facilities in good repair, as defined, from this
1% requirement.  
   This bill would extend the operation of this provision by 2 fiscal
years, through the 2014-15 fiscal year.  
   (13) Existing law, until January 1, 2012, authorizes a school
district to deposit the proceeds from the sale of surplus school
property, together with any personal property located on that
property, purchased entirely with local funds, into the general fund
of the school district and to use those proceeds for any one-time
general fund purpose.  
   This bill would extend the operation of this provision to January
1, 2014.  
   (14) Existing law, until July 1, 2013, renders inoperative a
requirement for the governing board of a school district to make a
report regarding proposals and plans for expenditure for the deferred
maintenance of school district facilities.  
   This bill would extend the operation of this provision to July 1,
2015.  
   (15) Existing law, to become operative on July 1, 2013, will
authorize the State Allocation Board to each year reserve an amount
not to exceed 10% of the funds transferred from any source to the
State School Deferred Maintenance Fund for apportionments to school
districts in instances of extreme hardship.  
   This bill would delay the operation of this provision until July
1, 2015.  
   (16) Existing law establishes the School Facilities Emergency
Repair Account in the State Treasury, and requires the State
Allocation Board to administer the account. Existing law establishes
the Proposition 98 Reversion Account in the General Fund, and
requires that the Legislature, from time to time, transfer into this
account moneys previously appropriated in satisfaction of the
constitutional minimum funding requirements that have not been
disbursed or otherwise encumbered for the purposes for which they
were appropriated. Existing law generally requires an amount,
equaling 50% of the unappropriated balance of the Proposition 98
Reversion Account or $100,000,000, whichever is greater, to be
transferred in the annual Budget Act from the Proposition 98
Reversion Account to the School Facilities Emergency Repair Account.
However, the amount to be transferred under this provision was set at
zero for the 2009-10 fiscal year.  
   This bill would also set at zero the amount to be transferred
under this provision from the Proposition 98 Reversion Account to the
School Facilities Emergency Repair Account for the 2010-11 and
2011-12 fiscal years.  
   (17) Existing law, for the 2009-10 fiscal year, sets the minimum
state requirement for a local educational agency's reserve for
economic uncertainties at 1/3 of the percentage for a reserve adopted
by the State Board of Education as of May 1, 2009, and requires a
school district to make progress in the 2010-11 fiscal year to
returning to compliance with the specified standards and criteria
adopted by the state board. Existing law restores this requirement,
for the 2011-12 fiscal year, to the percentage adopted by the state
board as of May 1, 2009.  
   This bill instead would provide that, for the 2010-11 and 2011-12
fiscal years, the minimum state requirement for a local educational
agency's reserve for economic uncertainties is 1/3 of the percentage
for a reserve adopted by the state board as of May 1, 2009, and
require a school district to make progress in the 2012-13 fiscal year
to returning to compliance with the specified standards and criteria
adopted by the state board. This bill would restore this
requirement, for the 2013-14 fiscal year, to the percentage adopted
by the state board as of May 1, 2009.  
   (18) Existing law requires, for the 1990-91 fiscal year and each
fiscal year thereafter, that moneys to be applied by the state for
the support of school districts, community college districts, and
direct elementary and secondary level instructional services provided
by the state be distributed in accordance with certain calculations
governing the proration of those moneys among the 3 segments of
public education. Existing law makes that provision inapplicable to
the fiscal years between 1992-93 and 2010-11, inclusive. 

   This bill would make that provision inapplicable to the 2011-12
fiscal year.  
   (18.5) Proposition 26, approved by the voters on November 2, 2010,
amended the California Constitution to, among other things, require
a 2/3 vote of both houses of the Legislature for any change in
statute that results in any taxpayer paying a higher tax. Proposition
26 also makes any tax adopted after January 1, 2010, but prior to
November 3, 2010, that was not adopted in compliance with the 2/3
vote requirement void on November 3, 2011, unless the tax in
reenacted by the Legislature with a 2/3 vote.  
   Existing law, as of July 1, 2010, eliminated the state sales and
use tax on motor vehicle fuel (gasoline) and increased the excise
tax. Existing law, as of July 1, 2011, increased the sales and use
tax on diesel and decreased the excise tax. Existing law requires the
State Board of Equalization to annually modify both the gasoline and
diesel excise tax rates on a going-forward basis so that the various
changes in the taxes imposed on gasoline and diesel, as described
above, are revenue neutral. Existing law contains other provisions
related to the implementation of these provisions.  

   This bill would repeal a provision, requiring the Director of
Finance to make a specified adjustment in the percentage of General
Fund revenues appropriated for school districts and community college
districts for purposes of the provisions of the California
Constitution requiring minimum funding for the public schools, that
is related to the implementation of these provisions. The bill would
enact a similar replacement provision, and state the intent of the
Legislature that these changes are made in order to comply with
Proposition 26.  
   (19) Existing law prescribes the percentage of General Fund
revenues appropriated for school districts and community college
districts for purposes of the provisions of the California
Constitution requiring minimum funding for the public schools.
 
   This bill would require the Director of Finance to adjust that
percentage in a specified manner for purposes of the 2011-12 fiscal
year.  
   (20) Existing law requires the county superintendent of schools to
determine a revenue limit for each school district in the county and
requires the amount of the revenue limit to be adjusted for various
factors. Existing law reduces the revenue limit for each school
district for the 2010-11 fiscal year by a deficit factor of 17.963%.
 
   This bill would maintain the deficit factor for each school
district for the 2011-12 fiscal year at 19.608%.  
   (21) Existing law establishes various categorical education
programs, and appropriates the funding for those programs in the
annual Budget Act. Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public
Instruction, for the 2008-09 to 2012-13 fiscal years, inclusive, to
apportion from the amount provided in the annual Budget Act for
specified categorical education programs an amount based on the same
relative proportion that the local educational agency received in the
2008-09 fiscal year for those programs, with certain exceptions.
Existing law authorizes school districts, for the 2008-09 to 2012-13
fiscal years, inclusive, to use the categorical education program
funds, with specified exceptions, for any educational purpose.
 
   This bill would extend the operation of this provision for 2
additional fiscal years, thus extending it through the 2014-15 fiscal
year. By allowing funds appropriated for specified purposes to be
expended for any educational purpose for 2 additional fiscal years,
the bill would make an appropriation.  
   (22) Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public
Instruction to allocate, for the 2010-11 fiscal year, a supplemental
categorical block grant to a charter school that began operation in
the 2008-09, 2009-10, or 2010-11 fiscal year.  
   This bill would extend the operation of this provision to require
the Superintendent to make these allocations for the 2011-12 fiscal
year, and to include charter schools that began operation in the
2011-12 fiscal year.  
   (23) Existing law establishes the Jack O'Connell Beginning-Teacher
Salary Incentive Program, under which a county superintendent of
schools, or the county board of education, may increase the salary
for certain teachers on its adopted certificated employee salary
schedule, as specified. The provisions establishing the program
require certain calculations to be made with respect to the average
daily attendance (ADA) of the participating local educational
agencies, and more specifically require specified adjustments to be
made in the calculation of ADA attributable to regional occupational
centers and programs for the 2008-09 to the 2012-13 fiscal years,
inclusive.  
   This bill would extend the requirement for these adjustments to be
made to the 2013-14 and 2014-15 fiscal years.  
   (24) Existing law, commencing with the 2009-10 school year and
continuing through the 2012-13 school year, authorizes a school
district, county office of education, or charter school to reduce the
equivalent of up to 5 days of instruction or the equivalent number
of instructional minutes without incurring fiscal penalties.
 
   This bill would extend the operation of this provision for 2
additional fiscal years, thus extending it through the 2014-15 school
year.  
   (25) Existing law establishes the Class Size Reduction Program,
under which a participating school district or county office of
education reduces class size to 20 pupils per class in kindergarten
and grades 1 to 3, inclusive. Existing law provides that, for the
2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11, and 2011-12 fiscal years, a school
district that has received funding under the program but has not
implemented its class size reduction program for all classes and
grades for which it received funding under the program, an amount is
deducted from the next principal apportionment of state funds to that
district in accordance with a schedule.  
   This bill would extend the operation of this provision to the
2012-13 and 2013-14 fiscal years.  
   (26) Existing law prohibits the State Board of Education from
adopting instructional materials until the 2013-14 school year.
 
   This bill would extend this prohibition through the 2015-16 school
year.  
   (27) Existing law, for the 2008-09 to the 2012-13 fiscal years,
inclusive, provides that the governing board of a school district is
not required to provide pupils with instructional materials by a
specified period of time following adoption of those materials by the
State Board of Education.  
   This bill would extend the operation of this provision by 2 fiscal
years, through the 2014-15 fiscal year.  
   (28) Under existing law, a community college or community college
district may not permit any person to access student records without
the written consent of the student or under judicial order for
access, with specified exceptions generally relating to education.
Existing law provides that a person, persons, agency, or organization
that is permitted access to student records is prohibited from
further disclosing the records without the written consent of the
student, as specified.  
   This bill would allow a person, persons, agency, or organization
that is permitted access to student records to disclose them pursuant
to the extent permitted under specified federal law and state law.
 
   (29) Existing law, the Ortiz-Pacheco-Poochigian-Vasconcellos Cal
Grant Program (Cal Grant Program), establishes the Cal Grant A and B
Entitlement Awards, the California Community College Transfer Cal
Grant Entitlement Awards, the Competitive Cal Grant A and B Awards,
the Cal Grant C Awards, and the Cal Grant T Awards under the
administration of the Student Aid Commission, and establishes
eligibility requirements for awards under these programs for
participating students attending qualifying institutions. 

   Existing law sets forth the maximum household income and asset
levels for participants in the various grant programs under the act.
These maximum levels are set forth as they were adopted by the
commission for the 2001-02 academic year, but have been annually
adjusted based on the percentage change in the cost of living as
defined in a specified provision of the California Constitution.
 
   This bill would provide that the maximum household income and
asset levels applicable to a renewing applicant would be the greater
of the adjusted household income and asset levels or the maximum
household income and asset levels at the time of the renewing
                                           recipient's initial Cal
Grant award, as specified.  
   This bill would impose additional requirements, except as
specified, on qualifying institutions, requiring the commission to
certify by October 1 of each year the institution's latest 3-year
cohort default rate as most recently reported by the United States
Department of Education. The bill would provide that an otherwise
qualifying institution that did not meet a specified 3-year cohort
default rate would be ineligible for new Cal Grant awards at the
institution.  
   This bill would require the Legislative Analyst's Office to submit
a report to the Legislature by January 1, 2013, on the
implementation of the 3-year cohort default rate provisions of the
act, as specified.  
   The bill would specify that financial need, for the purposes of
the act, would be determined to establish both an applicant's initial
eligibility for a Cal Grant award and a renewing applicant's
continued eligibility using federal financial need methodology, as
prescribed.  
   The bill would also require participating institutions, beginning
in 2012, to annually report to the commission enrollment,
persistence, and graduation data, as well as job placement, salary,
and wage information for undergraduate programs, as specified.
 
   (30) Existing law establishes community college districts under
the administration of community college governing boards, and
authorizes these districts to provide instruction at community
college campuses throughout the state. Existing law requires the
governing board of each community college district to charge each
student, with specified exceptions, a fee of $26 per unit per
semester, effective with the fall term of the 2009-10 academic year.
 
   This bill would increase that fee to $36 per unit per semester,
effective with the fall term of the 2011-12 academic year. 

   (31) Existing law, for the 2009-10 to 2012-13 fiscal years,
inclusive, authorizes a community college district to use funds
apportioned to the district for specified categorical programs, for
purposes of a prescribed list of programs.  
   This bill would extend the operation of this provision for 2
additional fiscal years, through the 2014-15 fiscal year. 

   (32) Existing law requires the Board of Governors of the
California Community Colleges to adopt regulations for the payment of
apportionments to community college districts. Existing law,
notwithstanding the board of governors' authority in this respect,
makes various adjustments to the payment of these apportionments.
 
   This bill would revise the manner in which these apportionments
are made according to specified criteria. The bill would appropriate
$961,000,000 from the General Fund to the Board of Governors of the
California Community Colleges for apportionments to community college
districts for expenditure during the 2012-13 fiscal year in
accordance with a specified schedule.  
   (33) Under existing law, the Controller is required to draw
warrants on the State Treasury in each month of each year in
specified amounts for purposes of funding school districts, county
superintendents of schools, and community college districts. Existing
law defers the drawing of those warrants, as specified. 

   This bill would, commencing with the 2011-12 fiscal year,
authorize the Controller to issue up to $13 million of warrants for a
community college district for the principal apportionments for the
month of June, that are instead to be drawn in July, subject to the
approval of the Director of Finance, as specified.  

   If the total amount requested by community college districts
exceeds $13 million, the Controller, the Treasurer, and the Director
of Finance may authorize additional payments, not to exceed $39
million. The determination whether there is sufficient cash available
to make these payments would be made no later than May 1, as
specified. In making this determination, the Controller, the
Treasurer, and the Director of Finance would be required to consider
costs for state government, the scope of any identified cash
shortage, timing, achievability, legislative direction, and impact
and hardship imposed on potential affected programs, as specified.
The Department of Finance would be required to notify the Joint
Legislative Budget Committee within 10 days of this determination and
identify the total amount of requests that will be paid. 

   The bill would provide that if the total amount of cash made
available is less than the amount requested, as specified, payments
to community college districts must be prioritized according to the
date the Office of the Chancellor of the California Community
Colleges and the Department of Finance were notified. Payments would
be required to be made no later than June 20.  
   This bill would specify that warrants drawn pursuant to this
authorization shall be deemed to be General Fund revenues
appropriated to school districts, as specified.  
   (34) The Budget Act of 2010 made numerous appropriations for the
support of public education in this state.  
   This bill would make adjustments in the schedules of 3 items of
the Budget Act of 2010 with respect to the funding of specified
programs.  
   (35) The Administrative Procedure Act, among other things, sets
forth procedures for the development, adoption, and promulgation of
regulations by administrative agencies charged with the
implementation of statutes.  
   This bill would authorize the State Department of Social Services
and the State Department of Education, notwithstanding the procedures
required by the Administrative Procedure Act, to implement the
provisions of the bill that relate to the Child Care and Development
Services Act through all-county letters, management bulletins, or
similar instructions.  
   (36) The bill would provide that the implementation of the
provisions of the bill related to the provision of child care
services would not be subject to the appeal and resolution procedures
for agencies that contract with the State Department of Education
for these purposes.  
   (37) This bill would reappropriate up to $60,000,000 in
unobligated balances appropriated in the Budget Act of 2009 to the
State Department of Education for CalWORKs Stage 3 child care
services for the period of April 1, 2011, to June 30, 2011,
inclusive. The bill would also require the State Department of
Education to use those funds for eligible families pursuant to a
specified provision as it read on January 1, 2011.  

   (38) This bill would appropriate $905,700,000 from the General
Fund to the State Department of Education for 10 specified programs
according to a specified schedule, and would require the department
to encumber these funds by July 31, 2012. The bill would provide
that, for purposes of satisfying the minimum annual funding
obligation for school districts required by the California
Constitution, the appropriated funds are General Fund revenues
appropriated for school districts and community college districts for
the 2012-13 fiscal year.  
   (39) Existing law creates the Charter School Revolving Loan Fund
in the State Treasury and authorizes the Superintendent of Public
Instruction to make loans from the fund to applicant charter schools
in accordance with specified criteria.  
   This bill would appropriate $5,000,000 from the General Fund to
augment the Charter School Revolving Loan Fund.  
   (40) This bill would set the cost-of-living adjustment for
specified items in the Budget Act of 2011 at 0% for the 2011-12
fiscal year, notwithstanding the cost-of-living adjustment specified
in existing statutes.  
   (41) This bill would require funds appropriated pursuant to
specified items in the Budget Act of 2011 to be encumbered by July
31, 2012.  
   (42) Existing law provides for collection and maintenance of
educational data. Existing law requires the State Department of
Education to contract for the development of the California
Longitudinal Pupil Achievement Data System (CALPADS), for the purpose
of providing for the retention and analysis of longitudinal pupil
achievement data on specified achievement tests.  
   This bill would appropriate $2,257,000 from the Federal Trust Fund
to the State Department of Education, in accordance with a specified
schedule, for purposes of the implementation and support of the
CALPADS.  
   The bill would require, as a condition of receiving funds to
administer CALPADS, the State Department of Education to ensure that
local educational agencies are provided with standardized templates
that include prepopulated data necessary to meet the requirements of
the School Accountability Report Card.  
   (43) Under existing law, the amount of revenue that a district may
collect annually for general purposes, called a revenue limit, is
calculated in accordance with various statutory formulas. A basic aid
school district is a school district where property tax revenues
exceed the revenue limit and the district consequently does not
receive a state apportionment.  
   This bill would express legislative intent that basic aid school
districts assume categorical funding reductions proportionate to the
revenue limit reductions implemented for nonbasic aid school
districts in the 2008-09 and 2009-10 fiscal years. The bill would
include calculations to implement these funding reductions. 

   (44) Existing law appropriates funding for class size reduction in
kindergarten and grades 1 to 3, inclusive, to be expended consistent
with the specified requirements.  
   This bill would reduce that appropriation in accordance with
specified requirements, and would identify funds that the State
Department of Education would be required to use if the funds
appropriated for this program are determined to be insufficient.
 
   The bill would require the Superintendent of Public Instruction to
certify to the Controller the amounts needed for the 2011-12 fiscal
year to fund the class size reduction program and set forth a
schedule for the transfer of that funding. The bill would require the
Controller to transfer that funding from the General Fund to the
State School Fund, thereby making an appropriation. 

   The bill would require the Superintendent, before making each
certification, to notify the Department of Finance, the Legislative
Analyst, and the appropriate policy and fiscal committees of the
Legislature regarding the amounts the Superintendent intends to
certify and would require the notification to include the data used
in determining the amounts to be certified.  
   (45) Existing law establishes the University of California, which
is administered by the Regents of the University of California and
the California State University, which is administered by the
Trustees of the California State University.  
   This bill would require the Regents of the University of
California and the Trustees of the California State University, in
implementing reductions contained in the Budget Act of 2011, to
minimize fee and enrollment impacts on students by targeting actions
that lower the costs of instruction and administration. The bill
would require the regents and the trustees to submit recommended
budget options, with savings estimates for each identified solution,
to the Legislature, the Governor, and stakeholders for review and
comment by June 1, 2011, prior to adoption of a final plan. The bill
would state enrollment goals for the 2011-12 academic year and
require the regents and the trustees to report to the Legislature by
May 1, 2012, on whether the University of California and the
California State University have met their respective 2011-12
enrollment goals. If the goals are not met, the Director of Finance
would be directed to revert the total amount of enrollment funding
associated with the total share of the enrollment goal that was not
met to the General Fund by May 15, 2012. This bill would require the
regents and the trustees to submit a final detailed report to the
Governor, the Department of Finance, and the Legislature, as
specified, by September 1, 2012.  
   (46) This bill would make conforming changes, correct some
cross-references, and make other technical, nonsubstantive changes.
 
   (47) The funds appropriated by this bill would be applied toward
the minimum funding requirements for school districts and community
college districts imposed by Section 8 of Article XVI of the
California Constitution.  
   (48) The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to
declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special
session for that purpose. Governor Schwarzenegger issued a
proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special
session for this purpose, on December 6, 2010. Governor Brown issued
a proclamation on January 20, 2011, declaring and reaffirming that a
fiscal emergency exists and stating that his proclamation supersedes
the earlier proclamation for purposes of that constitutional
provision.  
   This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency
declared and reaffirmed by the Governor by proclamation issued on
January 20, 2011, pursuant to the California Constitution. 

   (49) This bill would declare that it is to take immediate effect
as an urgency statute and a bill providing for appropriations related
to the Budget Bill. 
   Vote: 2/3. Appropriation: yes. Fiscal committee: yes.
State-mandated local program: no.


THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

   SECTION 1.    This act shall be known, and may be
cited, as the 2011 Realignment Legislation Addressing Public Safety.

   SEC. 2.   Section 15820.910 is added to the 
 Government Code   , to read:  
   15820.910.  A participating county that has received a conditional
award under the financing program, as set forth in Chapter 3.11
(commencing with Section 15820.80), may relinquish its conditional
award, provided that no state moneys have been encumbered in
contracts let by the county, and may reapply for a conditional award
under the financing program set forth in this chapter, as amended by
the act adding this section. 
   SEC. 3.    Section 15820.17 of the  
Government Code   , as amended by Section 4 of Chapter 16 of
the Statutes of 2011, is amended to read: 
   15820.917.  (a) Participating county  matching funds
  contribution  for projects funded under this
chapter shall be a minimum of  25   10 
percent of the total project costs. The CSA may reduce 
matching fund  contribution  requirements for
participating counties with a general population below 200,000 upon
petition by a participating county to the CSA requesting a lower
level of  matching funds   contribution  .
   (b) The CDCR and CSA shall give funding preference to counties
that committed the largest percentage of inmates to state custody in
relation to the total inmate population of CDCR in 2010. 
   (c) The CDCR and CSA shall give funding preference to counties
that relinquish their conditional awards pursuant to Section
15820.910, provided that those counties agree to continue to assist
the state in siting reentry facilities pursuant to Chapter 9.8
(commencing with Section 6270) of Title 7 of Part 3 of the Penal
Code.  
   (d) A participating county shall not receive more than one hundred
million dollars ($100,000,000) in proceeds from an issuance of the
SPWB pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 15820.913. 
   SEC. 4.    In addition to any amounts provided in the
Budget Act of 2011, the sum of one thousand dollars ($1,000) is
hereby appropriated from the General Fund to the Department of
Corrections and Rehabilitation for purposes of state operations to be
used by the Corrections Standards Authority in the 2011-12 fiscal
year. 
   SEC. 5.    This act shall become operative if
Assembly Bill 111 of the 2011-12 Regular Session of the Legislature
becomes operative. 
   SEC. 6.    This act is a bill providing for
appropriations related to the Budget Bill within the meaning of
subdivision (e) of Section 12 of Article IV of the California
Constitution, has been identified as related to the budget in the
Budget Bill, and shall take effect immediately. 
   SEC. 7.    This act is an urgency statute necessary
for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety
within the meaning of Article IV of the Constitution and shall go
into immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are:
 
   In order to obtain savings related to the Budget Act of 2011 at
the earliest possible time, it is necessary that this act take effect
immediately.  All matter omitted in this version of the bill
appears in the bill as amended in the Senate, March 16, 2011. (JR11)