BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó






                         SENATE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION
                             Alan Lowenthal, Chair
                           2011-2012 Regular Session
                                        

          BILL NO:       AB 124
          AUTHOR:        Fuentes
          AMENDED:       May 27, 2011
          FISCAL COMM:   Yes            HEARING DATE:  June 22, 2011
          URGENCY:       No             CONSULTANT:Kathleen Chavira

           NOTE:    This bill has been requested by the Senate Rules 
          Committee.  A "do
                 pass" motion should include a referral to the 
                 Committee on Senate Rules.  
           
          SUBJECT  :  English language development standards
          
           SUMMARY  

          This bill establishes the English Language Development 
          (ELD) Standards Advisory Committee for the purpose of 
          aligning the ELD standards to the Common Core English 
          Language Arts (ELA) standards adopted by the State Board of 
          Education in August 2010.  

           BACKGROUND  

          Current law establishes the Academic Content Standards 
          Commission which was required to develop common core 
          academic content standards in language and mathematics, as 
          specified.  Pursuant to these provisions, the standards 
          were presented to the State Board of Education (SBE) which 
          adopted the proposed common core academic content standards 
          in English language arts and mathematics on August 2, 2010. 
           (Education Code § 60605.8)

          Current law requires the State Board of Education to 
          approve English Language development standards for students 
          whose primary language is other than English.  Current law 
          also requires that these standards be comparable in rigor 
          and specificity to the standards adopted for English 
          language arts.
          (Education Code § 60811)

          Current law also requires the development or acquisition of 




                                                                AB 124
                                                                Page 2



          a test or series of tests for assessing the English 
          language development of students whose primary language is 
          other than English.  The resulting assessment, the 
          California English Language Development Test (CELDT) serves 
          three purposes: 1) identifies pupils as limited English 
          proficient, 2) determines the level of English language 
          proficiency of these students, and 3) annually assesses the 
          progress of these students in acquiring the skills of 
          listening, speaking, reading, and writing in English. Among 
          other things, current law requires that the test be aligned 
          with the English Language Development Standards and be age 
          and developmentally appropriate for students. (Education 
          Code § 60810)
           ANALYSIS
           
           This bill  :

          1)   Establishes the English Language Development Standards 
               Advisory Committee to ensure high quality instruction 
               for English learners as the state implements the 
               common core academic content standards in English 
               Language Arts.

          2)   Delineates the  13 members of the advisory committee 
               as follows: 

               a)        Four members appointed by the Governor.

               b)        Three members appointed by the Senate Rules 
               Committee

               c)        Three members appointed by the Speaker of 
               the Assembly

               d)        Three members appointed by the 
               Superintendent

          3)   Requires that these members serve at the pleasure of 
               the appointing authority.

          4)   Requires that at least seven of the members appointed 
               be credentialed public elementary or secondary 
               classroom teachers authorized for instruction of 
               English Learners, as specified.

          5)   Requires the advisory committee to update, revise, and 




                                                                AB 124
                                                                Page 3



               align the ELD standards to the ELA adopted standards 
               and that they be aligned by grade level and be 
               comparable to and as rigorous as the academic content 
               standards for English language arts.

          6)   Subjects the advisory committee meetings to Bagley 
               Keene Open Meeting provisions.

          7)   Requires the advisory committee to present its revised 
               and aligned ELD standards to the State Board by August 
               31, 2012.

          8)   Requires the State Board to adopt or reject the ELD 
               standards by September 30, 2012.  

          9)   Requires the State Board to transmit to the 
               Superintendent, Governor and the appropriate policy 
               and fiscal committees of the Legislature, specific 
               written explanation of their decision, if the 
               standards are rejected.

          10)  Requires the SPI and the SBE to present to the 
               Governor and appropriate policy and fiscal committees 
               a scheduled and implementation plan for implementing 
               and integrating the ELD standards into the state 
               public education system, including, but not limited 
               to, incorporation of the standards in to the ELD test. 
                
          11)  Declares the Legislature's intent that the work of the 
               advisory committee be supported by the use of Title 
               III federal funds.  

          12)  Makes other technical and conforming changes.

           STAFF COMMENTS  

           1)   Need for the bill  .  As noted in the background of this 
               analysis, pursuant to state law, the State Board of 
               Education recently adopted the common core standards 
               in English language arts and mathematics.   Although 
               the common core state standards introductory documents 
               acknowledge the importance of addressing the 
               instructional needs of English learners, the State 
               Board adopted common core standards make no specific 
               provision for this purpose.  According to the author, 
               because the ELD standards are a critical tool used in 




                                                                AB 124
                                                                Page 4



               instructing ELL pupils, the next logical step is for 
               the state to review the existing ELD standards for 
               compatibility with the newly adopted ELA academic 
               content standards.  This bill establishes a process 
               and structures an advisory committee similar to the 
               one established for purposes of adopting the common 
               core standards to revise, adopt and align the existing 
               ELD standards to the common core standards. 

           2)   English Language learners  .  English learners 
               constitute approximately 24 percent of the total 
               enrollment in California public schools.  A majority 
               of ELs (68 percent) are enrolled in the elementary 
               grades, kindergarten through grade six, with 31 
               percent enrolled in the secondary grades, seven 
               through twelve.  During 2009-2010 the CDE administered 
               the English language proficiency test (CELDT), for 
               purposes of initial or annual language proficiency 
               assessment, to 1.6 million students.

           3)   Current ELD standards  .  Assembly Bill 748, enacted in 
               1997, required that the test or tests assessing the 
               progress of English learners toward achieving fluency 
               in English be aligned with state standards for 
               English-language development.  The current ELD 
               standards, approved by the State Board of Education in 
               1999, were developed by a committee composed of 15 
               practitioners and experts in English-language 
               development and assessment and are designed to assist 
               teachers in moving English learners to fluency in 
               English and proficiency in the English-language arts 
               content standards. The current ELD standards were also 
               the basis for the development of the California 
               English Language Development Test (CELDT).  

               In 2006, test developers conducted a study for the CDE 
               evaluating linkage and alignment of the English 
               Language Development Standards and assessments. Among 
               other things, it found that ELD standards were 
               generally of lower complexity than content standards, 
               development of CELDT test items that reflect more 
               academic language functions and higher levels of 
               complexity would improve overall alignment of the 
               system, and increased emphasis on academic language 
               functions was necessary to bring ELD standards and 
               CELDT into better compliance with federal 




                                                                AB 124
                                                                Page 5



               requirements. 

           4)   Related department activity  .  In January 2010, the 
               U.S. Department of Education (USDE) announced that it 
               planned to add the development of English-proficiency 
               tests based on the common-core standards as a priority 
               to an existing competitive grant program, the Enhanced 
               Assessment Instruments Grant program. The plan calls 
               for a minimum of 15 states to join together in each 
               consortium that applies to create an 
               English-proficiency test and requires that members of 
               the consortium agree to a common definition of English 
               language learners and common criteria for students to 
               be reclassified.  The USDE anticipates the program 
               will be implemented by August 2011.  
               
               In June 2011, the CDE submitted to the USDE its 
               application to lead 18 other states in the development 
               of a new set of English language acquisition 
               assessments to better serve English learner students.  
               Staff recommends the bill be amended to declare the 
               Legislature's intent that the work of the advisory 
               committee created by this bill shall inform the 
               development of any new English language acquisition 
               assessments developed by the CDE. 

           SUPPORT  

          American Federation of State, County, and Municipal 
          Employees, AFL-CIO
          Association of California School Administrators
          California Association for Bilingual Education
          California Association of Latino Superintendents and 
          Administrators
          California Federation of Teachers
          California Immigrant Policy Center
          California Teachers Association
          California Teachers of English to Speakers of Other 
          Languages
          Californians Together
          Los Angeles County Office of Education
          Riverside County School Superintendents' Association
          State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson

           OPPOSITION





                                                                AB 124
                                                                Page 6



           None received.