BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó






                             SENATE INSURANCE COMMITTEE
                           Senator Ronald Calderon, Chair


          AB 125 (Insurance Committee)  Hearing Date:  April 13, 2011  

          As Amended: March 7, 2011
          Fiscal:             No
          Urgency:       Yes
          

           SUMMARY    Clarifies that a deductible required by an automobile 
          insurance policy may be covered by guaranteed automobile 
          protection (GAP) insurance & related contracts.  
          
           DIGEST
            
          Existing law

              1.   Defines "guaranteed automobile protections insurance" to 
               be insurance that covers a vehicle purchaser or lessee for 
               the difference between the actual cash value of the 
               insured's vehicle at the time of a total loss or 
               unrecovered theft and the amount owed on the vehicle.

             2.   Includes within this definition an allowance for up to 
               $5,000 above the amount necessary to cover the gap for 
               purchase of another vehicle. 

             3.   Provides for "waiver" clauses in vehicle conditional 
               sales contracts or lease agreements allowing the seller, 
               lender, or lessor to waive the difference between the 
               actual cash value of a vehicle at the time of a total loss 
               or unrecovered theft and the amount owed on the vehicle.

           This bill

              1.   Changes the definition of "GAP" so that the deductible 
               amount provided by a standard property damage insurance 
               policy may also be covered by GAP insurance.

             2.   Provides that a "waiver" clause in a vehicle conditional 
               sales contract or lease agreement, which is similar to GAP 
               insurance, but does not constitute insurance, and which can 
               be sold by people who are not licensed insurance agents, 
               may include the deductible amount provided by a standard 




                                                                      AB 
          125 (Insurance Committee), Page 2



               property damage insurance policy.

             3.   Replaces the word "automobile" with the word "asset" in 
               the definition of these contracts so that other vehicles, 
               such as motorcycles, motorhomes, boats, and off-road 
               vehicles, are also eligible to be covered by GAP 
               protection.

             4.   Authorizes waiver clauses to also include a discount or 
               incentive, above the amount required to satisfy the 
               obligation on the loan, lease or sales contract, for the 
               vehicle owner to purchase a replacement vehicle using the 
               same seller, lender or lessor.

             5.   Provides that the bill is an urgency measure, to take 
               effect immediately.


            
           COMMENTS

                
             1.   Purpose of the bill: AB 125 was introduced by the 
               Assembly Insurance Committee to fix an error in last year's 
               AB 2782 (Committee on Insurance) omnibus bill and ensure 
               that California law does not unreasonably frustrate the 
               legitimate expectations of California consumers with 
               respect to what "Gap" insurance extends to.

             2.   Background and Discussion: During the prior session, the 
               Assembly Insurance Committee undertook to recognize in 
               statute, and acknowledge the differences which exist 
               between true insurance products, and waiver provisions in 
               loans, leases and sales contracts which have long been 
               marketed as "GAP" products. In doing so, the committee's AB 
               2782 inadvertently eliminated coverage for the deductible 
               amounts commonly provided for in automobile insurance 
               policies.  This oversight renders most subject contracts in 
               the California market non-compliant . It also puts at risk 
               consumers' reasonable expectations about the scope of the 
               protection they are purchasing since these expectations 
               cannot be met under the definitions enacted by AB 2782.

           Summary of Arguments in Support:  

              3.   GAP insurance and related waiver products provide a 




                                                                      AB 
          125 (Insurance Committee), Page 3



               sound consumer protection service because it is common with 
               respect to vehicle purchases that loan or lease amounts 
               exceed the "actual cash value" of the vehicle in the early 
               years of a loan or lease.  Until these products came into 
               the market, consumers often found themselves owing a lender 
               more than the correct insurance settlement would provide.  
               The result for consumers was either out-of-pocket losses to 
               make up the difference, or damage to the consumer's credit 
               rating due to defaulting on the remainder of the loan or 
               lease balance.
                
             4.   The Consumer Credit Industry Association (CCIA) states 
               "We believe that a misinterpretation of California AB 2782, 
               which passed in 2010, has led to the unintended prohibition 
               against lenders ability to waive the loan or lease amount 
               including insurance deductibles. Prior to passage of AB 
               2782, a GAP waiver product could and did provide this 
               deductible coverage. Consumers are harmed by the inability 
               of GAP waiver providers to continue to provide this 
               benefit. The failure of the availability of this benefit 
               would harm consumers by the inability of GAP waiver to 
               continue to provide this benefit." 

             5.   The American Financial Services Association (AFSA) 
               states "AB 125 will ensure that GAP continues to cover the 
               deductible amount in the state - thus ruling out any 
               potential interpretations that may be detrimental to 
               consumers."

             6.   California Financial Services Association (CFSA), 
               indicates it strongly supports AB 125 related to Guaranteed 
               Automobile Protection (GAP) insurance because it "would 
               rectify a drafting error from last year's AB 2782" which 
               "inadvertently eliminated coverage for the deductible 
               amounts commonly provided for in automobile insurance 
               policies."

             7.   The Guaranteed Asset Protection Alliance (GAPA) states 
               "A year ago GAPA was pleased to see the passage of AB 2782 
               which made clear that GAP waiver is not an insurance 
               product. However, the law as passed resulted in the 
               unforeseen consequence of GAP providers being unable to 
               waive the amount attributable to a primary carrier's 
               deductible. This coverage is typically provided to 
               consumers as part of a GAP waiver and its removal would 
               harm California consumers. Even though these consumers 




                                                                      AB 
          125 (Insurance Committee), Page 4



               purchased a waiver, they would be forced to pay the portion 
               of the debt attributable to their deductible. AB 125 will 
               repair this unintended consequence and will return a 
               valuable protection to California Consumers".


           Summary of Arguments in Opposition: 
           
             8.   None Received


           Amendments:  None Proposed

          Prior and Related Legislation:   

               a.     AB 2782 (Committee on Insurance) Chapter 400, 
                 Statutes of 2010

               
          LIST OF REGISTERED SUPPORT/OPPOSITION
          
          Support
           
          American Financial Services Association (AFSA)
          California Financial Services Association (CFSA)
          Consumer Credit Industry Association (CCIA)
          Guaranteed Asset Protection Alliance (GAPA)
          OwnerGUARD
           
          Opposition
               
          None

          Consultant: Ken Cooley  (916) 651-4110