BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 197 Page 1 ASSEMBLY THIRD READING AB 197 (Monning) As Introduced January 27, 2011 Majority vote LABOR & EMPLOYMENT 5-1 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Ayes:|Swanson, Alejo, Allen, | | | | |Furutani, Yamada | | | | | | | | |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------| |Nays:|Miller | | | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY : Increases the amount of liquidated damages that may be awarded to an employee when an employer fails to pay minimum wage to two times the wages unlawfully unpaid, plus interest. EXISTING FEDERAL LAW establishes the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, which sets a federal minimum wage, with specified exceptions. EXISTING STATE LAW : 1)Sets the minimum wage for all employees in California, with limited exceptions, and prohibits employers, unless specified, from paying less than the state minimum wage. 2)Establishes the Industrial Wage Commission (IWC) to, among other duties, review the adequacy of the minimum wage every two years. 3)Permits an individual to sue his or her employer, in a civil action, for liquidated damages in an amount that is equal to the wages unlawfully unpaid, plus interest, when the employer pays that individual less than the minimum wage. FISCAL EFFECT : Unknown COMMENTS : According to the sponsor of this bill, the California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation (CRLAF), this bill doubles the amount of liquidated damages that could be assessed AB 197 Page 2 against an employer who fails to pay minimum wages and would bring California into alignment with 10 other states which have recently enacted similar legislation in an effort to deter wage theft in the underground economy. CRLAF states this bill is in response to the ongoing underfunding of the Division of Labor Standards (DLSE) and that DLSE currently has fewer authorized positions for enforcement staff than it had in 1980, which inhibits its ability to find, cite and collect civil penalties for minimum wage violations. The author's office points out there is substantial evidence of widespread minimum wage violations in California, particularly in the underground economy. UCLA's 2010 report, Wage Theft and Workplace Violations in Los Angeles , found that 29.7% of workers surveyed in Los Angeles County were paid below the state minimum wage. The Ford Foundation cited in its 2009 report, Broken Laws, Unprotected Workers , that depending on the industry or occupation, between 40% and 60% of workers were not paid the minimum wage. PRIOR LEGISLATION : AB 1881 (Monning) of 2010 was nearly identical to this bill and was vetoed by Governor Schwarzenegger. In his veto message he stated in part, "the recoveries and penalties are already available to employees and that there was nothing indicating California's minimum wage law was lacking." ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : Proponents concur with the sponsor of this bill stating that it will bring California into the mainstream with other states that have recently increased damages paid to workers when their employers cheat them out of the state's respective minimum wages. They state that this bill is a response to the chronic underfunding of the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE) which inhibits its ability to detect, cite and collect civil penalties for minimum wage violations, particularly in the underground economy. They AB 197 Page 3 assert that DLSE's underfunding also significantly undercuts its ability to collect unpaid wages. The California Teamsters Public Affairs Council, amongst others, argues that under existing law, in a court action to recover wages unpaid for minimum wage, the court may award liquidated damages equal to the amount of unlawfully unpaid wages, plus interest. They also state this remedy enhancement will promote compliance by California employers with California's minimum wage requirements. ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION : The Civil Justice Association of California, the California Chamber of Commerce, the Western Growers, California Framing Contractors Association, and the California Hotel & Lodging Association, amongst others, strongly oppose this bill stating that the current availability of liquidated damages for minimum wage violations, let alone any expansion of them, is unjustified and oppressive. They state that liquidated damages are a type of punitive damages that may be awarded in addition to the underpaid wages owed, interest on the underpaid wages and statutory penalties per pay period that employers must pay to make an employee whole. Finally, they argue that California's employers are already subject to an expansive number of wage and hour laws, regulations and substantial penalties for each. Analysis Prepared by : Lorie Erickson / L. & E. / (916) 319-2091 FN: 0000293