BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó







         ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 
        |Hearing Date:June 13, 2011         |Bill No:AB                         |
        |                                   |214                                |
         ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 


                      SENATE COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS, PROFESSIONS 
                               AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
                          Senator Curren D. Price, Jr., Chair
                                           

                          Bill No:        AB 214Author:Davis
                   As Introduced:      January 31, 2011 Fiscal: Yes

        
        SUBJECT:  Professional photocopiers.
        
        SUMMARY:  Requires identification cards for employees of a 
        professional photocopier or a partnership or corporation to include a 
        photograph of the employee.

        Existing law:
        
       1)Defines a professional photocopier as any person who for compensation 
          obtains or reproduces documents under the Confidentially of Medical 
          Information Act, the Information Practices Act of 1977, or the 
          production of business records under the Evidence Code and has 
          access to the information in those records while performing those 
          duties.  Requires a professional photocopier to register with the 
          county clerk in the county in which his or her principal place of 
          business is located.  (Business and Professions Code (BPC) § 22450)

       2)Requires the county clerk of each county to maintain a register of, 
          and assign a unique number to the professional photocopier

       3)Requires the county clerk to issue an identification card to each 
          registrant, and provides that additional registration cards shall be 
          issued to employees of professional photocopiers subject to a $10 
          fee (BPC § 22457).  

       4)Provides that the identification card issued to a professional 
          photocopier must meet certain size requirements, contain specified 
          information, and further provides that:

           a)   The identification card must contain a photograph of the 





                                                                         AB 214
                                                                         Page 2



             registrant.

           b)   The identification card for a partnership or corporation shall 
             not contain a photograph.  (BPC § 22457)

        This bill:

       1)Additionally requires the identification card for an employee of a 
          professional photocopier or a partnership or corporation, to include 
          a photograph of the employee, as specified.

       2)Makes conforming changes.

        FISCAL EFFECT:  The Assembly Appropriations Committee analysis dated 
        May 4, 2011, indicates there are no significant costs associated with 
        this legislation.

        COMMENTS:
        
        1. Purpose.  This bill is sponsored by  California Association of 
           Clerks and Election Officials  (Sponsor) in order to clean-up 
           existing law to require identification cards for professional 
           photocopiers to have pictures included.  

        According to the Author, the bill attempts to clarify legislative 
           intent with regard to  AB 620  (John Perez, Chapter 458, Statutes of 
           2009) and the issuance of professional photocopier identification 
           cards to employees of corporations.  AB 620 established new minimum 
           size requirements and other changes to identification cards for a 
           specified class of registered professions.  Among its clean-up 
           provisions, AB 620 deleted the requirement that a card issued to a 
           corporation must contain a photograph, but the bill remained silent 
           on whether an employee identification card must contain a photo.  

        The Author indicates that as amended by AB 620, the law is silent 
           regarding whether to include a photograph on the identification 
           card of an employee of a corporation needed to act as a 
           professional photocopier on behalf of the corporation.  According 
           to the Author, counties are interpreting the Code both ways, and 
           issuing cards with and without photographs statewide.  This is 
           causing issues for professional photocopiers, who are being faced 
           with difficulties establishing their identity and qualifications 
           while using the cards that do not have photographs, according to 
           the Author.

        2. Background.  Professional photocopiers are employed by law firms, 





                                                                         AB 214
                                                                         Page 3



           legal services or insurance companies that require access to 
           documents for litigation or in conducting investigations.  The 
           professional photocopier is sent to obtain copies of documents and 
           to transport and deliver them to the appropriate parties.  
           Identification cards are needed because of the personal or 
           confidential nature of the documents. 

        3. Related Legislation.   The provisions in this bill were in last 
           year's  SB 1491  (BP&ED Committee, Chapter 415, Statutes of 2010), 
           this Committee's non-health omnibus bill.  However, the amendments 
           were removed in the Assembly out of concern that there may be 
           fiscal implications for the requirement to include a photograph on 
           the identification card.  

         AB 620  (John Perez, Chapter 458, Statutes of 2009) removed the 
           requirement that identification cards issued to photocopying 
           partnerships or corporations have a photograph on the lower left 
           corner.  The bill additionally revised the minimum size 
           requirements for identification cards for unlawful detainer 
           assistants, legal document assistants, and process servers, as well 
           as for professional photocopiers.
        
        4. Arguments in Support.  The  California Association of Clerks and 
           Election Officials , the Sponsor of both AB 620 and this bill, 
           writes that after the enactment of AB 620, the new process for 
           issuing professional photocopier identification cards to employees 
           of corporations revealed an unclear provision in the law.  "The 
           language clearly stated the parameters for corporation cards (no 
           photo) and for 'individual' cards (photo to be contained in the 
           bottom left corner) but did not clearly direct the clerk how to 
           configure the card for employees of corporations."  According to 
           the Sponsor, the Author's office was contacted by numerous 
           companies who employ professional photocopiers with complaints that 
           those counties who were issuing cards without photos were causing 
           problems for employees of photocopier services who were unable to 
           verify their identity.  The Sponsor states that, "AB 214 will 
           insert language in the Business and Professions Code to direct 
           counties to include a photograph on the professional photocopier 
           identification card for employees of corporations.  This will 
           ensure that the policy and procedure will be uniform across the 
           State."


        SUPPORT AND OPPOSITION:
        
         Support:   California Association of Clerks and Election Officials 





                                                                         AB 214
                                                                         Page 4



        (Sponsor)

         Opposition:   None on file as of June 8, 2011



        Consultant:G. V. Ayers