BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 232 Page 1 CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS AB 232 (V. Manuel Pérez and Alejo) As Amended June 14, 2012 Majority vote ----------------------------------------------------------------- |ASSEMBLY: |75-0 |(January 26, |SENATE: |37-0 |(August 22, | | | |2012) | | |2012) | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Original Committee Reference: J., E.D. & E. SUMMARY : Removes the specific dollar-for-jobs and low- and moderate- income ranking criteria in state law from the small cities portion of the federal Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG). The change will result in conforming state rules with federal law, allowing the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), the program administrator, flexibility to choose among federal options for determining the dollar-for-jobs and ranking criteria. The Senate amendments make technical amendments including clarification that CDBG state guidelines shall meet the minimum requirements of federal statute for eligible projects that meet national objectives. EXISTING LAW : 1)Designates HCD as the administrator of the small cities portion of the federal CDBG program. 2)Provides Legislative intent that funds be provided to small and rural counties to encourage new housing and meet local economic development needs. 3)Requires HCD to allocate no less than 51% of CDBG funds for providing or improving housing opportunities to low- or moderate-income households. AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY , this bill removed the more restrictive $35,000 dollar-for-jobs state requirement and other specific ranking criteria from the small cities portion of the federal CDBG Program. FISCAL EFFECT : According to the Senate Appropriations AB 232 Page 2 Committee, pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8, negligible state costs. COMMENTS : Existing federal law establishes the CDBG Program to provide communities with resources to address a wide range of unique community development needs, including affordable housing, services to the most vulnerable, and job creation through the expansion and retention of businesses. A grantee must use 70% of CDBG funds for activities that benefit low- and moderate-income persons. In addition, each activity must meet one of three national objectives for the program: 1) benefit low and moderate-income persons; 2) prevent or eliminate slums or blight; and, 3) address urgent community development needs posing a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community. Federal CDBG funds are allocated to states using two accounts: entitlement and Small Cities. Entitlement funds are awarded directly to cities with more than 50,000 residents and counties with more than 200,000 residents. Small Cities or non-entitlement funds are awarded directly to states for distribution to cities with less than 50,000 residents and counties with less than 200,000 residents. With respect to these economic development activities, federal regulations require HCD to meet a two pronged dollar-per-job test: 1) a maximum of $50,000 per actual individual job, known as the individual test; and, 2) a maximum average of $35,000 per job statewide over a funding cycle, known as the aggregate test. Under existing state law, however, businesses receiving a loan through the CDBG Program must create or retain at least one job for every $35,000. In other words, state law sets the maximum for the individual test at the same level as the maximum for the aggregate test. State law also requires HCD, when developing scoring factors for CDBG economic development awards, specifically to use the three national CDBG objectives described above. This measure removes the more limited requirements from the statute, allowing HCD the flexibility to more effectively award funding for economic development projects across the state. Related legislation: AB 1556 (Assembly Jobs, Economic Development and the Economy Committee), which would have required grantees of CDBG funds for AB 232 Page 3 local revolving loan programs to contract with approved financial intermediaries was held in Assembly Committee on Appropriations in 2010. SB 194 (Florez), which would have required local governments to include representation from disadvantaged unincorporated communities in their Citizen Advisory Committee was vetoed on September 30, 2010. In his veto message, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger wrote: This bill would establish, to the extent permitted by federal law, requirements governing the use of a citizen advisory committee (CAC) by a local government that chooses to use a CAC in the course of preparing plans for the expenditure of federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds received directly from the federal Department of Urban Development (HUD). This bill is unnecessary. The federal CDBG regulations already mandate a public hearing with significant outreach elements as part of the grant recipients' planning processes; further, imposing a state requirement on a federal program would be inappropriate and in fact may not be permitted by federal law and regulations. Analysis Prepared by : Toni Symonds / J., E.D. & E. / (916) 319-2090 FN: 0004341