BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 305
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 6, 2011

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                   AB 305 (Furutani) - As Amended:  March 17, 2011 

          Policy Committee:                              Business and 
          Professions  Vote:                            9 - 0 

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program: 
          No     Reimbursable:              

           SUMMARY  

          This bill revises the State Personnel Board's (SPB) reporting 
          requirements to the Legislature pertaining to the use of foreign 
          languages at state agencies. Specifically, this bill: 

          1)Changes the definition of "substantial number of 
            non-English-speaking people."

          2)Requires the use of United States Census Data or Department of 
            Finance (DOF) population data in determining the number of 
            non-English speaking people in an area. 

          3)Requires SPB to include the following in its report to the 
            Legislature:

             a)   State agencies not incompliance.
             b)   State agencies and their respective field offices that 
               have staffing deficiencies.
             c)   Agencies that have deficiencies in translated materials.
             d)   Significant problems or deficiencies and recommended 
               solutions.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          SPB's current computer system is unable to aggregate the data in 
          a way that would allow them to report field office deficiencies. 
           A new system would likely cost in excess of $300,000 General 
          Fund. 
          
           COMMENTS  









                                                                  AB 305
                                                                  Page  2

           1)Purpose  . The intent of this legislation is to increase the 
            reporting requirements in the Dymally-Alatorre Bilingual 
            Services Act. According to the sponsors, Asian Americans for 
            Civil Rights & Equality and the Mexican American Legal Defense 
            and Educational Fund, this bill will allow policymakers to be 
            more accurately informed about the language needs of residents 
            in our state and state agencies' ability to meet those needs. 
            Under current law, SPB is required to present the results of 
            the biennial survey to the Legislature.  However, they are not 
            required to report the details of their findings or 
            information on which departments are out of compliance with 
            the Act. 

           2)Background  . Enacted in 1973, the Dymally-Alatorre Bilingual 
            Services Act declares "the effective maintenance and 
            development of a free and democratic society depends on the    
                     right and ability of its citizens and residents to 
            communicate with their government and the right and ability of 
            the government to communicate with them."  The Act requires 
            bilingual staffing and services at each state agency office 
            when five percent or more of its clients speak a language 
            other than English.  

            In a 1999 report, the State Auditor found that only two of 10 
            surveyed state departments were even aware of the Act's 
            requirements, and only one of these was attempting to 
            translate documents as required by the law.  Subsequently, the 
            SPB concluded that none of the 20 state departments it 
            investigated were in compliance with the Act.  

           3)Prior Legislation  . In 2002, SB 987 (Escutia) would have 
            expanded SPB's authority to ensure compliance with 
            Dymally-Alatorre and would have expanded reporting 
            requirements.  That bill was vetoed. In his veto message, 
            Governor Davis directed departments to begin implementing the 
            changes contained in the bill but did not sign the bill 
            because of department's inability to absorb the costs 
            associated with the changes. 


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Julie Salley-Gray / APPR. / (916) 
          319-2081 











                                                                  AB 305
                                                                  Page  3