BILL ANALYSIS Ó ------------------------------------------------------------ |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 315| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |1020 N Street, Suite 524 | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ------------------------------------------------------------ THIRD READING Bill No: AB 315 Author: Solorio (D) Amended: 5/5/11 in Assembly Vote: 27 - Urgency SENATE INSURANCE COMMITTEE : 9-0, 6/8/11 AYES: Calderon, Gaines, Anderson, Corbett, Correa, Lieu, Lowenthal, Price, Wyland SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : 8-0, 6/27/11 AYES: Kehoe, Walters, Alquist, Emmerson, Lieu, Pavley, Price, Steinberg NO VOTE RECORDED: Runner ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 78-0, 5/19/11 - See last page for vote SUBJECT : Surplus line brokers SOURCE : Department of Insurance DIGEST : This bill conforms California law applicable to surplus line insurance to mandatory changes included in the federal Nonadmitted and Reinsurance Reform Act provisions of last year's Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. ANALYSIS : Existing California law: CONTINUED AB 315 Page 2 1. Requires insurers wishing to "transact insurance" in California to be "admitted" (or licensed) by the Department of Insurance (DOI) for that purpose. 2. Provides, as a key element of licensing, financial oversight in the form of solvency monitoring activities. The primary focus of financial analysis at the DOI is on licensed multi-state insurers and licensed California-domiciled companies. 3. Authorizes licensed "surplus lines brokers", when a risk cannot be placed with an admitted insurer, to place the risk with an insurer that is not fully licensed in California, subject to rules and financial requirements designed to strengthen the public's confidence when dealing with such entities. 4. Requires that such nonadmitted insurers must apply for placement on the DOI's "List of Eligible Surplus Lines Insurers" (LESLI List), and they cannot be added until the Insurance Commissioner approves the application as meeting statutory requirements. 5. Requires insurance exchanges, which are a class of state-regulated entity which can accept surplus lines risks, to maintain capital and surplus in the same amount as a surplus line company. 6. Prohibits, for most purposes, a nonadmitted insurer from selling insurance in California except though a surplus lines broker, who reaches out and places the California insurance with the nonadmitted insurer outside of the state. In this sense, the nonadmitted insurer is not "transacting" insurance in California. 7. Imposes various duties on surplus lines broker to ensure compliance with the Surplus Lines law. Existing federal law: 1. The federal Nonadmitted and Reinsurance Reform Act (NRRA) adopted as Subtitle B of Title V in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Act) last year becomes effective on July 21, 2011. CONTINUED AB 315 Page 3 The NRRA includes provisions preempting state laws applying to nonadmitted insurance other than laws from the policyholder's home state as of July 21, 2011. 2. The NRRA grants the home state of a policyholder the exclusive authority to require payment of premium taxes and placement regulation by nonadmitted insurers. The Act establishes a uniform mechanism for payment and allocation of nonadmitted insurance and regulation of surplus lines brokers. 3. The NRRA revises the process for exempt commercial purchasers to obtain insurance from surplus lines carriers and defines "exempt commercial purchaser" as any person that, at the time of placement, satisfies the following requirements: A. Employs or retains a qualified risk manager to negotiate insurance coverage; B. Has paid aggregate nationwide commercial property and casualty insurance premiums in excess of $100,000 in the immediately preceding 12 months; and C. The person meets at least one of the following criteria: Possesses a net worth in excess of $20 million (as adjusted in accordance with the Act's requirements); Generates annual revenues in excess of $50 million (as adjusted in accordance with the Act's requirements); Employs more than 500 full-time or full-time equivalent employees per individual insured or is a member of an affiliated group employing more than 1,000 employees in the aggregate; Is a not-for-profit organization or public entity generating annual budgeted expenditures in excess of $30 million (as adjusted in accordance CONTINUED AB 315 Page 4 with the Act's requirements); or Is a municipality with a population in excess of 50,000 persons. The NRRA provides if the commercial purchaser satisfies these requirements, then the surplus lines broker will be exempt from state law requirements to determine whether the amount or type of coverage sought is available from admitted insurers. This bill: 1. Achieves conformity with the NRRA by repealing the requirement that, in most circumstances, prohibits placement of insurance with a nonadmitted insurer unless that insurer is on the LESLI List. 2. Repeals the criteria necessary for an insurer to be placed on the LESLI List, but readopts similar criteria for placement on a voluntary list of acceptable insurers. 3. Establishes financial requirements that nonadmitted insurers not on the voluntary list must meet in order for a surplus line broker to place insurance with that insurer. 4. Defines a "home state insured" as an insured or applicant that has its principal place of business in the state, or, if an individual, has his/her principal place of residence in this state. 5. Defines "commercial insured" as a company that pays over $100,000 in annual property/casualty insurance premium, has a qualified risk manager on staff, and has one of the following attributes: a net worth of over $20,000,000, annual revenues of over $50,000,000, is a non-profit or municipality with an annual budget of over $30,000,000, is a municipality of over 50,000 residents, or has over 500 full-time employees. 6. Exempts a commercial insured from the requirement that a surplus line broker must make a diligent search of the CONTINUED AB 315 Page 5 admitted market prior to placement of insurance with a nonadmitted insurer. 7. Imposes on a surplus line broker the duty to ascertain if an insured is a home state insured, and requires the surplus line broker to collect the surplus line tax from the home state insured. 8. Conforms the statutory notice requirements to the new NRRA rules. 9. Reformulates the surplus line broker licensing law to conform to the NRRA. 10.Makes numerous technical and conforming amendments. Background and Discussion . The newly adopted federal law (NRRA) prohibits states from having mandatory listing requirements like California's current LESLI List, but does not prohibit state establishment of financial solvency requirements. The surplus line community, however, enjoys the convenience of a formalized list of insurers that are known to be in compliance and acceptable and they are allowed under the NRRA if voluntary. Accordingly, this bill repeals the LESLI List and its detailed financial requirements, but then re-enacts very similar detailed financial requirements twice - once as elements of the criteria to be placed on the voluntary list, and a second time to govern the criteria of insurers that are not interested in complying with the voluntary listing regulatory requirements. The financial standards, which were increased with industry support to ensure policyholder protection as recently as last Session, remain in place essentially in the same form and amount as before. Comments Purpose of the bill . This bill's purpose is to conform California's Surplus Lines law to the provisions of the NRRA adopted as Subtitle B of Title V in the Act which CONTINUED AB 315 Page 6 President Obama signed into law on July 21st, 2010. That federal act included provisions to add uniformity and simplicity to the states' regulatory laws governing the placement of surplus line insurance, and collection of the surplus line tax. It pre-empts certain regulatory requirements of California law, and, unless conforming law is enacted by July 21, 2011, California's authority to collect the surplus line tax would also be limited. States have until July 21, 2011 to conform their laws to the NRRA. After that date, its preemption provisions kick in. FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: No According to the Senate Appropriations Committee: Fiscal Impact (in thousands) Major Provisions 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Fund Admin expenses ----------minor, absorbable---------- Special* Gross premium tax Unknown, potentially several million General revenue gain or loss *Insurance Fund SUPPORT : (Verified 6/27/11) Department of Insurance (source) California Insurance Wholesalers Association Insurance Brokers and Agents of the West National Association of Professional Surplus Line Offices ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : The DOI, this bill's sponsor, states "AB 315 incorporates into California law applicable provisions of recently enacted federal law that revamped the business and taxation practices of surplus lines insurance." The reason for this bill's urgency clause is CONTINUED AB 315 Page 7 addressed as follows: "Enactment of AB 315 by July 21, 2011, is integral for the smooth transition of California's surplus lines market to the new federal requirements. Failing to meet this deadline could result in market disruption and the potential for loss of business even in the admitted market." In additional commentary, the DOI states: "A surplus lines insurer, also known as a non-admitted insurer, is not licensed in California, but is licensed in another state or country. Under current state law, surplus lines brokers may place coverage with a surplus lines insurer if insurance for the risk is not available from an admitted insurer and other specified criteria are satisfied. Surplus lines premium tax imposed on the insured is collected by the CDI from the broker placing the coverage, and remitted to the state's General Fund. An insured also may directly obtain coverage from a surplus lines insurer under specified conditions, and in these cases the insured remits the premium tax directly to the Franchise Tax Board. For multi-state policies, California collects premium tax associated with only its allocated portion of the policy risks. "Last year, President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Act). In addition to making extensive changes in the financial markets, the Act provides: Exclusive rights to the home state of the insured for regulation of surplus lines insurance placements and broker license requirements; Specifies that the home state of the insured has sole authority to collect surplus lines premium taxes; and, Permits states to enter into tax sharing arrangements to allocate taxes on multi-state surplus lines policies. California, as well as the other states, has until July 21, 2011, to enact the applicable provisions of the Act CONTINUED AB 315 Page 8 to avert federal preemption. AB 315 incorporates applicable provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act into California law." ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 78-0, 5/19/11 AYES: Achadjian, Allen, Ammiano, Atkins, Beall, Bill Berryhill, Block, Blumenfield, Bonilla, Bradford, Brownley, Buchanan, Butler, Charles Calderon, Campos, Carter, Cedillo, Chesbro, Conway, Cook, Davis, Dickinson, Donnelly, Eng, Feuer, Fletcher, Fong, Fuentes, Furutani, Beth Gaines, Galgiani, Garrick, Gatto, Gordon, Grove, Hagman, Halderman, Hall, Harkey, Hayashi, Roger Hernández, Hill, Huber, Hueso, Huffman, Jeffries, Jones, Knight, Lara, Logue, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, Mansoor, Mendoza, Miller, Mitchell, Monning, Morrell, Nestande, Nielsen, Norby, Olsen, Pan, Perea, V. Manuel Pérez, Portantino, Silva, Skinner, Smyth, Solorio, Swanson, Torres, Valadao, Wagner, Wieckowski, Williams, Yamada, John A. Pérez NO VOTE RECORDED: Alejo, Gorell JJA:kc 6/28/11 Senate Floor Analyses SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE **** END **** CONTINUED