BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 332 Page 1 Date of Hearing: April 12, 2011 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON AGING AND LONG-TERM CARE Mariko Yamada, Chair AB 332 (Butler) - As Amended: April 6, 2011 SUBJECT : Elder Abuse. SUMMARY : Elder and Dependent Financial Abuse: fines: Specifically, this bill : As Amended April 6, 2011 1)Increases fines for theft, embezzlement, forgery, or fraud, and identity theft and identity crimes against an elder or dependent adult from a maximum of $1,000 to a maximum of $2,500, when the value of the losses from the crime do not exceed $950. 2)Increases fines for theft, embezzlement, forgery, or fraud, and identity theft and identity crimes when perpetrated by a caregiver from a maximum of $1,000 to a maximum of $2,500, when the value of the losses from the crime do not exceed $950. 3)Adds a new fine for theft, embezzlement, forgery, or fraud, and identity theft and identity crimes against an elder or dependent adult when the value of the losses exceed $950, but do not exceed $100,000, in the amount of $5,000. 4)Adds an additional new fine for theft, embezzlement, forgery, or fraud, and identity theft and identity crimes against an elder or dependent adult in the amount of $25,000 when the value of the losses exceed $100,000. 5)Makes various technical and grammatical changes. EXISTING LAW: 1)Generally guarantees rights associated with acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and pursuing and obtaining safety, happiness, and privacy. 2)Provides that crimes against elders and dependent adults are deserving of special consideration and protection, because AB 332 Page 2 elders and dependent adults may be cognitively or physically impaired, and therefore less able to protect themselves, to understand or report criminal conduct, or to testify in court proceedings on their own behalf. 3)Defines "dependent adult" as any person who is between the ages of 18 and 64, who has physical or mental limitations which restrict his or her ability to carry out normal activities or to protect his or her rights, including, but not limited to, persons who have physical or developmental disabilities or whose physical or mental abilities have diminished because of age. 4)Defines "elder" as any person who is 65 years of age or older. 5)Establishes fines and other punishment for theft, embezzlement, forgery, or fraud, and identity theft and identity crimes, as follows: a) For those persons who are not a caretaker, and who knows or reasonably should know that the victim is an elder or a dependent adult, and the value of the labor, goods, services, funds, or real and/or personal property taken does not exceed $950: i) By a fine not exceeding $1,000; ii) By imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year; or, iii) By both that fine and imprisonment. b) For those persons who are not a caretaker, and who knows or reasonably should know that the victim is an elder or a dependent adult, and the value of the labor, goods, services, funds, or real and/or personal property taken exceeds $950: i) Up to one year in a county jail; or, ii) State prison for two, three or four years. c) For those persons who are a caretaker, and the value of the labor, goods, services, funds, or real and/or personal property taken does not exceed $950: i) By a fine not exceeding $1,000; AB 332 Page 3 ii) By imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year; or, iii) By both that fine and imprisonment. d) For those persons who are a caretaker, and the value of the labor, goods, services, funds, or real and/or personal property taken exceeds $950: i) Up to one year in a county jail; or, ii) State prison for two, three or four years. FISCAL EFFECT : Unknown COMMENTS : According to the author, "(c)riminal abuse of our seniors must be fought at every level possible. That is why I am asking for an increased fine for those who commit this crime whether or not they are a caregiver or non-caregiver." Recent reports describe identity theft and other financial crimes as having catastrophic consequences, including the loss of homes, life savings, and independence. Adult Protective Services (APS) workers, law enforcement officials, and others rank financial abuse and exploitation among their most challenging cases because perpetrators of identity theft, fraud, financial abuse, and exploitation have demonstrated remarkable agility in changing practices in response to new laws, regulations, and market forces. As a result, laws created to respond to specific forms of abuse quickly become obsolete. Discussion: Recent amendments to AB 332 bring a degree of balance to the fine and penalty structure for Penal Code Section 368 with regard to theft, embezzlement, forgery, or fraud, and identity theft and identity crimes against elder or dependent adults. Existing law provides for incarceration of up to one year in county jail and/or a fine of up to $1,000 if the value of the moneys, labor, goods, services, or real, or personal property taken or obtained is less than $950. In the event the value of moneys, labor, goods, services, or real, or personal property taken or obtained exceeds $950, there is no fine, though the incarceration is incrementally increased from up to one year in county jail, to up to one year in county jail or 2, 3 or 4 years in state prison. AB 332 increases the existing fine of $1,000 to $2,500. AB 332 AB 332 Page 4 also adds language to establish two additional fines; one in the amount of $5,000 for violations that result in losses exceeding $950 but do not exceed $100,000, and another fine of $25,000 when the value of the losses from the violation exceeds $100,000. AB 332 does not impact incarceration. Arguments in support: The author and staff, on behalf of the sponsors, the California Senior Legislature, have expressed a desire to see a more effective deterrent in statute. The sponsor states that there is a great burden of time and money devoted to repairing the damage to existing accounts as a result of identity theft and that elders and dependent adults are often not equipped to protect themselves from unscrupulous criminals who prey on those who are vulnerable and isolated and may not have friends or family looking out for them. AB 332 bolsters the protections that elders and dependent adults need. The California Long-Term Care Ombudsman Association states that elder abuse has terrible consequences for care facility residents and their loved ones, and references studies that prove that abused elders have significantly shorter life spans, often "giving-up'" after having become a victim. The California State Sheriffs Association states that AB 332 protects the most vulnerable among us by maximizing fines for persons who steal the identity of elders. Arguments in opposition: Legal Service of Prisoners with Children argues that current law provides for restitution and that increasing fines will not benefit the elderly person who has been harmed, and that they are concerned that California is attempting to balance our state budget by turning to criminal defendants. Conflict in statute: Penal Code Section 672, provides the following: "Upon a conviction for any crime punishable by imprisonment in any jail or prison, in relation to which no fine is herein prescribed, the court may impose a fine on the offender not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000) in cases of misdemeanors or ten thousand dollars ($10,000) in cases of felonies, in addition to the imprisonment prescribed." AB 332 Page 5 Penal Code Section 672 may provide a more meaningful deterrent than current language in AB 332 when losses from crimes exceed $950, but are less than $100,000. Penal Code 672 allows for fines up to $10,000. AB 332 as written provides for fines up to $5,000. The author may wish to consider addressing the potential conflict in the Public Safety Committee as this bill is dual referred next to that committee. REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION : Support California Senior Legislature (CSL) - sponsor AFSCME California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform (CANHR) California Long-Term Care Ombudsman Association (CLTCOA) California State Sheriff's Association (CSSA) Opposition Legal Services for Prisoners with Children (LSPC) Analysis Prepared by : Robert MacLaughlin / AGING & L.T.C. / (916) 319-3990