BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 396
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:  May 3, 2011

                            ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HEALTH
                              William W. Monning, Chair
                   AB 396 (Mitchell) - As Amended:  April 25, 2011
           
          SUBJECT  :  Medi-Cal: juvenile detention facilities.

           SUMMARY  :  Requires the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) 
          to develop a process to allow counties to obtain matching 
          federal funds for health care services provided to juvenile 
          detainees who are admitted to a medical institution.  
          Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Prohibits a juvenile detainee who is an inpatient in a medical 
            institution from being denied Medi-Cal eligibility on the 
            basis of the institutional status as a detainee of a public 
            institution.  

          2)Requires DHCS to consult with counties in the development of a 
            process to allow counties to obtain matching federal funds for 
            health care services provided to juvenile detainees in a 
            medical institution and to seek any federal approvals 
            necessary. 

          3)Conditions implementation on the obtaining of necessary 
            federal approval and only to the extent that existing levels 
            of federal financial participation (FFP) are not jeopardized.

          4)Authorizes DHCS to exempt the juvenile detainees from 
            mandatory enrollment in a managed care plan. 

          5)Provides for implementation only for those counties that elect 
            to voluntarily provide the nonfederal share of expenditures 
            for juvenile detainees and who, but for inpatient status, 
            would be otherwise ineligible for Medi-Cal as a detainee of a 
            public institution.

          6)Requires the FFP obtained through this process to be paid to 
            the participating county.

          7)Authorizes implementation without any further regulatory 
            action by means of all-county letter or similar instruction. 

          8)Prohibits this bill from being construed to alter or abrogate 








                                                                  AB 396
                                                                  Page  2

            any obligation of the state pursuant to administrative action 
            or court order as specified to fund and reimburse counties for 
            medical services provided to juvenile detainees. 

          9)Makes legislative findings with regard to potential 
            availability of FFP for counties that provide health care 
            services to juvenile detainees while the juveniles are 
            admitted as patients in a medical institution, that an 
            individual under 21 years of age who is an inmate of a public 
            institution has his or her Medi-Cal services suspended for up 
            to one year, that current procedures do not allow counties to 
            obtain FFP, that DHCS is authorized to develop a process to 
            maximize FFP for inpatient hospital services to adult inmates 
            residing in a state prison facility and that to reduce the 
            fiscal strain on counties, it is imperative that DHCS work 
            with counties to develop and implement a similar process to 
            allow counties to obtain FFP based on county expenditures for 
            inpatient hospital services provided to juveniles in their 
            custody.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Establishes the Medi-Cal Program, administered by DHCS, to 
            provide comprehensive health care services and long-term care 
            to pregnant women, children, and people who are aged, blind, 
            and disabled.

          2)Establishes a schedule of benefits under the Medi-Cal Program 
            but excludes from the definition of "health care services," 
            care or services for any individual who is an inmate of an 
            institution (except as a patient in a medical institution), 
            except to the extent permitted by federal law.

          3)Allows, under federal law, continued Medicaid (Medi-Cal in 
            California) eligibility even when an inmate of a public 
            institution is prohibited from receiving benefits, and states 
            that an individual is not considered to be living in a public 
            institution if the individual is in a public institution for a 
            temporary period pending other arrangements.

          4)Requires that Medi-Cal benefits of a juvenile who is an inmate 
            of a public institution to be suspended, as specified.

          5)Establishes a Low-Income Health Program (LIHP) that includes 
            inpatient hospital services for state prison inmates, 








                                                                  AB 396
                                                                  Page  3

            parolees, and county jail inmates and authorizes DHCS to 
            obtain FFP through the Medi-Cal Program or the LIHP.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  This bill has not been analyzed by a fiscal 
          committee

           COMMENTS  :  

           1)PURPOSE OF THIS BILL  .  According to the author, currently, 
            when counties detain minors in a juvenile detention facility 
            or probation camp, their Medi-Cal benefits are suspended.  The 
            author asserts that there is a federal option that would 
            permit Medi-Cal benefits if a minor is admitted to a hospital 
            for treatment and is away from the detention facility for more 
            than 24 hours.  The author states that counties are unable to 
            use this option unless set in statute and therefore counties 
            are now paying the full cost of minors detained in juvenile 
            detention facilities or camps when they are treated outside of 
            the facility.  According to the author, this bill would allow 
            counties to seek reimbursement from the federal government.  

           2)BACKGROUND  .  Medi-Cal regulations make individuals who are 
            inmates of public institutions ineligible for Medi-Cal.  
            However, the federal Social Security Act governing Medicaid 
            and a 1997 letter from the federal Department of Health and 
            Human Services indicates FFP is available through Medicaid 
            when an inmate becomes a patient in a medical institution on 
            an inpatient basis.  Additionally, a 2004 letter to State 
            Medicaid directors from the federal Centers for Medicare and 
            Medicaid Services (CMS) encourages states to "suspend" and not 
            "terminate" benefits while a person is in a public institution 
            or Institute for Mental Disease, noting the payment exclusion 
            (known as the "inmate exception") under Medicaid does not 
            affect the eligibility of an individual for the Medicaid 
            program.  This policy was codified with regard to juveniles in 
            SB 1147 (Calderon and Yee), Chapter 546, Statutes of 2008.  
            DHCS indicated that the necessary protocols were issued in 
            March 2010.  

           3)ADULT INMATES AND PAROLEES  .  In November 2010, CMS approved a 
            five-year Medi-Cal Section 1115(a) Demonstration/Pilot Project 
            Waiver, entitled "A Bridge to Reform."  This Demonstration is 
            intended as a bridge to implementation of the Patient 
            Protection and Affordable Care Act which requires states to 
            include childless adults, under age 65, who are not otherwise 








                                                                  AB 396
                                                                  Page  4

            eligible for Medi-Cal or Medicare with incomes up to 133% of 
            the federal poverty level (FPL) in its Medicaid program.  The 
            2010 waiver and AB 342 (John A. Pérez), Chapter 723, Statutes 
            of 2010, implementing these provisions, establishes the LIHP 
            for this population and provides for it to be statewide at 
            county option.  A county that chooses to participate will use 
            Certified Public Expenditures as the matching funds.  Counties 
            are authorized to provide LIHP coverage to persons with income 
            up to 200% FPL as well, but in a fashion that minimizes the 
            need to impose a limit on the population that is 0-133% FPL.  
            AB 1628 (Committee on Budget), Chapter 729, Statutes of 2010, 
            allows counties to use enroll inmates, prisoners and parolees 
            in the LIHP program to obtain FFP for inpatient hospital 
            services provided to state prison inmates and for mental 
            health services provided to parolees and provides for 
            reimbursement to the counties from the California Department 
            of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) for those inmates for 
            whom it is responsible.  Additionally, AB 1628 allows 
            participating counties to seek FFP for Medi-Cal eligible jail 
            inmates that were paid for from county funds.

           4)SUPPORT  .  The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors, sponsor 
            of this bill, writes that this bill would allow counties to 
            draw down federal matching funds to reimburse them for the 
            medical treatment of minors who are hospitalized and outside 
            of the County's detention facility for more than 24 hours.  
            According to the supporters, the Los Angeles County Probation 
            Department operates three juvenile detention facilities and 18 
            juvenile camps.  The supporters state that most of the minors 
            taken into custody are from low-income families which make 
            them eligible for Medi-Cal.  The supporters also state that 
            many minors detained in local detention facilities often 
            require medical care which is outside the scope of medical 
            services available at the facility.  According to the 
            supporters, medical conditions requiring hospitalization 
            include complications from asthma, diabetes, epilepsy, or 
            heart problems.  The supporters also argue that in cases where 
            minors require hospitalization for a contagious or 
            communicable disease, care at a medical facility is vital not 
            only for their health and wellbeing, but for the other 
            detainees and probation staff before the minor returns to the 
            detention facility.  

            The Los Angeles County Probation Officers' Union (LACPOU), 
            AFSCME, Local 685, also in support, states that to the extent 








                                                                  AB 396
                                                                  Page  5

            that FFP is not jeopardized and federal approval obtained, the 
            CDCR and DHCS are authorized to develop a process for the 
            provision of inpatient hospital services to inmates who would 
            otherwise be eligible for Medi-Cal, but for their 
            institutional status as inmates.  According to LACPOU, this 
            bill will additionally require DHCS to maximize FFP for the 
            health care services provided by counties to juveniles in 
            their custody who would otherwise be eligible for Medi-Cal.  
           
          5)RELATED LEGISLATION  .  SB 695 (Hancock) of 2011 allows counties 
            to seek reimbursement for Medi-Cal benefits for an individual 
            awaiting adjudication in a county juvenile detention facility 
            or camp, if that individual is eligible to receive benefits at 
            the time of their admittance.  SB 695 is a reintroduction of 
            SB 1091 (Hancock) of 2010.



           6)PRIOR LEGISLATION  :

             a)   SB 1091 (Hancock) of 2010, was vetoed by Governor 
               Schwarzenegger.  The veto message was as follows: "This 
               bill, while well-intentioned, is inconsistent with federal 
               law and exposes the state to potentially significant costs. 
                If the author wishes to craft workable legislation that 
               allows for additional federal funds but also adheres to 
               federal Medicaid law and regulations, the Department of 
               Health Care Services would be willing to assist in that 
               effort next year."

             b)   SB 1147 (Calderon and Yee), Chapter 546, Statutes of 
               2008, requires DHCS to develop procedures to ensure that 
               the Medi-Cal eligibility of minors is not terminated when 
               they are incarcerated.

             c)   SB 648 (Calderon) of 2007 would have required DHCS to 
               suspend rather than terminate the Medi-Cal benefits of an 
               incarcerated minor.  SB 648 was referred to Senate Health 
               Committee but was not heard.

             d)   SB 1469 (Cedillo), Chapter 657, Statutes of 2007, 
               requires county juvenile detention facilities, following 
               the issuance of an order of the juvenile court committing a 
               county ward to a juvenile hall, camp, or ranch for 30 days 
               or longer, to provide the county welfare department with 








                                                                  AB 396
                                                                  Page  6

               the ward's name, his or her scheduled or actual release 
               date, any known information regarding the ward's Medi-Cal 
               status prior to disposition, and sufficient information, 
               when available, for the county welfare department to begin 
               the process of determining the ward's Medi-Cal eligibility.

           7)DOUBLE REFERRAL  .  This bill is double referred. It was heard 
            in the Assembly Public Safety Committee on April 5, 2011 and 
            passed out on a vote of 7-6.

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors, (sponsor)
          American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, 
          AFL-CIO
          California Medical Association
          Los Angeles County Probation Officers' Union, AFSCME, Local 685
          Riverside Sheriffs' Association

           Opposition 
           
          None on file.
           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Marjorie Swartz / HEALTH / (916) 
          319-2097