BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 403
                                                                  Page 1

          CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
          AB 403 (Campos)
          As Amended  July 12, 2011
          Majority vote
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |76-0 |(May 26, 2011)  |SENATE: |33-0 |(August 31,    |
          |           |     |                |        |     |2011)          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
            
           Original Committee Reference:    E.S. & T.M.  

           SUMMARY  :  Specifies that the primary drinking water standard for 
          hexavalent chromium (chromium 6) is included in the existing 
          expedited Department of Finance (DOF) regulatory review process 
          for drinking water standards.  Requires the California 
          Department of Public Health (DPH) to post the report on its 
          progress on developing a drinking water standard for chromium 6 
          on its Internet Web site.   

           The Senate amendments  add Senator Alquist as a principal 
          coauthor and make a minor, technical change.

           EXISTING LAW  requires:

          1)Each primary drinking water standard adopted by DPH to be set 
            at a level that is as close as feasible to the corresponding 
            public health goal (PHG), published by the Office of 
            Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), placing 
            primary emphasis on the protection of public health, and that, 
            to the extent technologically and economically feasible, meets 
            specified public health requirements.  Requires the PHG to 
            contain an estimate of the level of the contaminant in 
            drinking water that is not anticipated to cause or contribute 
            to adverse health effects, or that does not pose any 
            significant risk to health. 

          2)DPH to report to the Legislature on its progress in developing 
            a primary drinking water standard for chromium 6 by January 1, 
            2003.

          3)DPH to establish a primary drinking water standard for 
            chromium 6 on or before January 1, 2004.

          4)DOF, for any proposed regulation that relates to the maximum 








                                                                  AB 403
                                                                  Page 2

            contaminant level for primary or secondary drinking water 
            standards, to take no longer than 90 days to review and act 
            upon that rule or regulation.

          5)DPH and the Office of Administrative Law to proceed with all 
            other applicable procedures in connection with the adoption of 
            proposed regulations should DOF take longer than 90 days to 
            act upon the proposed drinking water standard regulations.
           
          AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY  , this bill was substantively similar 
          to the version passed by the Senate.
           
          FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations 
          Committee, negligible state costs, if any.

           
          COMMENTS  :

           Need for the bill :  The author argues that, "In 2001, Senator 
          Ortiz introduced SB 351, Chapter 602, which required DPH to 
          adopt a primary drinking water standard for hexavalent chromium 
          by January 1, 2004.  However, DPH never complied due to the lack 
          of a Public Health Goal. DPH is tasked to provide a Maximum 
          Contaminant Level (MCL) based primarily on the Public Health 
          Goal and other regulatory and feasibility processes.  This bill 
          will simply ensure that DPH complies in a timely manner and sets 
          a standard that has been long overdue in order to ensure our 
          communities are provided with drinking water that is safe and 
          meets stringent requirements."

           Chromium 6  :  According to OEHHA, chromium 6 is a heavy metal 
          that is commonly found at low levels in drinking water.  
          Chromium 6 is known to be a potent carcinogen when inhaled.  It 
          was recently found to also cause cancer in laboratory mice and 
          rats that were exposed through drinking water.  According to the 
          Environmental Working Group, in California, chromium 6 was 
          detected in 2,208 out of the more than 7,000 tap water systems 
          analyzed as of 2008 (DPH 2009).  

           Current status of the chromium 6 maximum contaminant level 
          (MCL)  :  California has long recognized the public health risks 
          of exposure to chromium 6.  In 1977, California established 
          a drinking water standard, or MCL, for total chromium expressly 
          to address exposure to chromium 6.









                                                                  AB 403
                                                                  Page 3

          Health and Safety Code (HSC) Section 116365(a) requires DPH to 
          establish an MCL at a level as close as is technically and 
          economically feasible to the contaminant's PHG.  In March 2001, 
          the Department of Health Services, DPH's predecessor agency, 
          requested that OEHHA prepare a PHG for chromium 6 in preparation 
          for a MCL on chromium 6 alone.  SB 351 (Ortiz), Chapter 607, 
          Statutes of 2001, requires DPH to adopt an MCL for chromium 6 by 
          January 1, 2004 (HSC Section 116365.5).  

          On July 27, 2011, OEHHA announced that it had set the final PHG 
          for chromium 6 at 0.02 parts per billion (ppb), which is the 
          same level as the draft that was released for public comment in 
          December 2010.   State law requires OEHHA to set PHGs to provide 
          scientific guidance to DPH in developing enforceable drinking 
          water standards.  By law, DPH must set the eventual standard, or 
          MCL, as close to the PHG as economically and technically 
          feasible.

           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Shannon McKinney / E.S. & T.M. / (916) 
          319-3965 

                                                                FN: 0002503