BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                           Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair


          AB 404 (Gatto) - Lobbyists:  County Assessors
          
          Amended: August 9, 2012         Policy Vote: GF 5-3
          Urgency:  No                    Mandate: Yes
          Hearing Date: August 16, 2012                          
          Consultant: Maureen Ortiz       
          
          SUSPENSE FILE.
          
          
          Bill Summary:  AB 404 requires any county that has an existing 
          ordinance regulating lobbying before the board of supervisors to 
          amend the ordinance to apply its provisions to persons who lobby 
          the county assessor.

          Fiscal Impact:  Unknown, likely over $50,000 in state 
          reimbursable costs (General)

          AB 404 will require the state to reimburse local governments for 
          the costs of amending their ordinances to include provisions 
          that include tax agents who lobby county assessors, as 
          specified.

          Background:  In recent years, as property values have declined, 
          the number of property tax appeals has risen dramatically.  The 
          Legislative Analyst's Office estimates that tax appeals have 
          increased from approximately 44,000 in 2006-07 to 173,000 in 
          2010-11.  Individual taxpayers may appeal an assessor's 
          valuation of a property, or can hire a tax agent to represent 
          them in the appeal.  The conduct of tax agents before assessor 
          and assessment appeals boards is largely unregulated unless the 
          individual is an attorney licensed by the State Bar, or an 
          accountant regulated by the California Board of Accountancy.  
          The Board of Equalization does require tax agents to file a 
          Property Tax Rule 305 form which authorizes the agent to 
          represent the taxpayer. 

          Currently there are only six counties that have adopted a local 
          ordinance regulating lobbying activities before the county board 
          of supervisors or other county positions, and which would 
          immediately be affected by the requirements in AB 404.  Those 
          six counties are Los Angeles, Orange, San Francisco, Santa 








          AB 404 (Gatto)
          Page 1



          Clara, San Diego, and San Mateo although they differ 
          significantly in the manner in which lobbying activities are 
          regulated. Some of the ordinances restrict campaign 
          contributions, gifts, and employing county officials, and 
          prohibit intentionally deceiving elected officials or 
          misrepresenting themselves or their clients.   All of the six 
          county ordinances require lobbyist registration and include 
          reporting requirements for gifts and campaign contributions. 

          According to recent news reports, a Los Angeles County District 
          Attorney investigation led to the arrest of a property appraiser 
          who formerly worked for Los Angeles County Assessor John Noguez 
          on charges of illegally reducing assessments on properties 
          totaling $172 million.  That investigation is ongoing.  

          Proposed Law:  AB 404 provides that tax agents must register as 
          lobbyists in any county that regulates lobbying by ordinance.   
          The bill requires those county boards to amend their ordinance 
          to include any person who represents a taxpayer for compensation 
          before the county assessor, employees of the county assessor, 
          the county assessment appeals board, the county board of 
          equalization, or any assessment hearing officer who makes 
          recommendations to the county board of equalization or the 
          county assessment appeals board.

          The lobbying registration requirement will not apply to a 
          property owner.  AB 404 specifically provides that its 
          provisions will not prohibit a tax agent from charging a 
          contingency fee in connection with any matter before a county 
          assessor, employees of the county assessor, the county 
          assessment appeals board, the county board of equalization, or 
          any assessment hearing officer who makes recommendations to the 
          county board of equalization or the county assessment appeals 
          board.