BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 419
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 11, 2011

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                  AB 419 (Mitchell) - As Amended:  April 28, 2011  

          Policy Committee:                              Human 
          ServicesVote:6 - 0 

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program: 
          No     Reimbursable:              

           SUMMARY  

          This bill increases the frequency of inspections at facilities 
          licensed by the Department of Social Services (DSS), Community 
          Care Licensing Division (CCLD). Specifically, this bill: 

          1)Requires that every licensed community care facility shall be 
            inspected at least once per year.

          2)Exempts family day care homes from the annual visit 
            requirement and instead requires that they be visited once 
            every two years. 

          3)Requires that inspections be conducted using inspection 
            protocols that are research based, field tested, reviewed by 
            stakeholders, and annual evaluated. 

          4)Requires that one zero tolerance violation shall trigger a 
            comprehensive inspection.  


           FISCAL EFFECT  

          Costs in the range of tens of millions of dollars (GF) to 
          increase CCLD licensed facility inspections to once every year. 
          CCLD budget reductions over the years have caused the state to 
          adopt policies that reduce standard inspections to about once 
          every three to five years. The proposed budget for CCLD in 
          2011-12 is $97.7 million ($18.7 million GF). 

           COMMENTS  









                                                                  AB 419
                                                                  Page  2

           1)Purpose  . The intent of this legislation is to significantly 
            increase the number of inspection visits to licensed 
            facilities such as child care centers, residential care 
            facilities for the elderly, family child care homes, and 
            foster family homes. In addition, this bill requires that CCLD 
            adopt new licensing and inspection protocols that are field 
            tested and research based, rather than the current system 
            which involves inspectors checking a long list of health and 
            safety items during each inspection. The author of this bill 
            notes that increasing the frequency of licensing visits 
            "demonstrates that in the State of California we value those 
            we care for and place their health and safety as a high 
            priority."

            Though not stated in or required by this bill, the author 
            hopes that the Department of Social Services will adopt the 
            "key indicator" approach to licensing visits. 

           2)Background  . Prior to 2003, the required frequency of CCLD 
            facility visits was annually for most facility types (and 
            tri-annually for family child care).  Since then, in response 
            to the state's fiscal situation, it was deemed necessary to 
            find ways to reduce costs.  As a result CCLD is now required 
            to do unannounced visits annually only in circumstances when 
            the facility has a history of compliance 
            problems-approximately 10% of facilities. For those 
            residential facilities not subject to annual inspections, CCLD 
            is currently required to conduct comprehensive compliance 
            inspections on a 30% random sample of facilities each year, 
            with no facility being visited less than once every five 
            years.  There are additional inspection requirements for new 
            facilities or when changes occur to the license. These 
            pre-licensing inspection and post-licensing inspections help 
            to ensure that a new licensee starts off correctly.

           3)Key Indicator Visits  . A key indicator protocol uses citation 
            histories and program field experience to develop specific 
            targeted evaluation criteria for each type of licensed 
            facility. These targeted visits should create efficiencies 
            within CCLD which allow them to inspect facilities more often 
            without a significant increase in costs.  Currently, CCLD is 
            in the process of developing a "Key Indicator Compliance 
            Inspection" protocol for prioritizing its inspection 
            activities.  DSS intends to use the key indicator protocols 
            for licensing inspections to increase the frequency and 








                                                                 AB 419
                                                                  Page  3

            efficiency of licensing visits while maintaining the health & 
            safety oversight of all facilities.

           4)Are Key Indicator Visits the goal?  While the author may intend 
            for this bill to require DSS adopt a cost neutral or cost 
            savings approach that allows CCLD to conduct annual 
            inspections within their existing resources, there is nothing 
            in the language that requires them to use the Key Indicator 
            Visit approach.  The language merely states that they must 
            adopt a research based protocol. In addition, DSS is currently 
            working on implementing Key Indicator Visits. 

            If it is the author's intent that this be the approach used, 
            there is no need for this legislation since those changes are 
            allowed under current law and underway within the department. 

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Julie Salley-Gray / APPR. / (916) 
          319-2081