BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                      



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   AB 441|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 441
          Author:   Monning (D), et al.
          Amended:  6/4/12 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMM.  :  6-2, 6/12/12
          AYES:  DeSaulnier, Kehoe, Lowenthal, Pavley, Rubio, 
            Simitian
          NOES:  Gaines, Harman
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Wyland

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  Senate Rule 28.8

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  50-23, 1/26/12 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Transportation planning

           SOURCE  :     California Pan Ethnic Health Network 


           DIGEST  :    This bill requires the California Transportation 
          Commission (CTC) to attach to its guidelines for preparing 
          regional transportation plans a summary of policies, 
          practices, or projects that promote health that 
          metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) can use in 
          regional transportation plans (RTP).

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law requires the CTC to adopt 
          guidelines to govern the RTPs that the state-designated 
          regional transportation planning agencies (RTPA) and the 
          federally-designated MPOs prepare.  In addition, the CTC, 
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AB 441
                                                                Page 
          2

          in consultation with the Department of Transportation 
          (Caltrans) and the California Air Resources Board, is 
          required to maintain guidelines for travel demand models 
          used in the development of the RTPs.  The CTC guidelines 
          also provide a framework to ensure that the RTPs address 
          regional planning requirements, including the sustainable 
          community's strategy, an element of SB 375 (Steinberg), 
          Chapter 728, Statutes of 2008.  The CTC is also authorized 
          to prescribe study areas for analysis and evaluation for 
          the MPOs and the RTPAs to include in their RTPs.  The RTPs 
          are important because under state and federal law 
          transportation projects cannot be funded unless they are 
          included in the RTP.

          This bill requires the CTC to include a summary of the 
          policies, practices, or projects that MPOs have employed to 
          promote health and health equity in regional plans as an 
          attachment to its regional transportation planning 
          guidelines.  The summary may reference The Safe Routes to 
          Schools program, multiuse recreational trails, and 
          pedestrian and bicycle pathways. 

           Background .

          The assumption underlying this bill is that there is a link 
          between the "built environment," such as streets, patterns 
          of both residential and commercial development, transit 
          systems, location of parks, and other features of human 
          habitation, and health issues such as obesity, diabetes, 
          asthma, and traffic fatalities.  Because of this linkage, 
          it is necessary, in the opinion of the sponsors, to widen 
          the scope of health planning.  To this end, the RTP 
          guidelines provide a means to bring these concerns to the 
          attention of the transportation planning community by 
          appending examples of transportation programs and projects 
          that rely less on auto transportation and more on walking, 
          bicycling, and using public transit. 

          The proponents argue that the emphasis in SB 375 to reduce 
          vehicle miles traveled creates an opportunity in the 
          regional transportation planning process to address the 
          strong connection between the built environment and a 
          myriad of health outcomes.  There has been a very strong 
          focus on local community designs and city general plans 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AB 441
                                                                Page 
          3

          that are now leading to new plans, projects, and policies 
          to improve health and safety. 

           An emerging awareness  .  Some RTPAs/MPO's, notably SANDAG in 
          California, are taking steps to incorporate walking, 
          bicycling, Safe Streets to School, and other related 
          activities that reduce auto dependency and encourage 
          walking and related forms of mobility into their RTP. 

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes   
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  6/25/12)

          California Pan Ethnic Health Network (source) 
          John Chiang, State Controller
          American Heart Association
          California Black Health Network
          California Center for Public Health Advocacy
          California Foundation for Independent Living Centers
          Central California Regional Obesity Prevention Program
          Children Now
          Health Officers Association of California
          Regional Asthma Management and Prevention 
          Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors 
          South Coast Air Quality Management District
          Transform 

           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  6/25/12)

          Placer County Transportation Planning Agency

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the author's office, 
          decisions about land use and transportation have enormous 
          influence on our health.  The Institute of Medicine argue 
          that improving health in the 21st century will require new 
          approaches, including strategies to deal with unhealthy 
          buildings, urban congestion, poor housing, poor nutrition, 
          and environmentally-related stress.  Research shows that 
          transportation and neighborhood design can directly impact 
          the likelihood of developing certain preventable health 
          conditions such as asthma, diabetes, obesity, depression, 
          unintended injuries, and some cancers.  Transportation 
          policy is directly linked to our health through its effects 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AB 441
                                                                Page 
          4

          on physical activity, air quality, and the risk of injury.  
          Recent studies have found that when public transportation 
          is accessible, people tend to walk or ride a bike to and 
          from train stations and bus stops, which increases their 
          physical activity.  Additionally for every hour walked each 
          day, a person's risk of obesity decreases by five percent.  
          The author believes that current RTP guidelines do not 
          adequately address how land use and transportation policies 
          impact the health of our state's residents. 

           ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION :    The Placer County 
          Transportation Planning Agency states in opposition, "While 
          the Board understands that improving public health is an 
          important issue, the Placer County Transportation Planning 
          Agency feels that the goals of AB 441 are already addressed 
          in the method in which transit and transportation projects 
          are currently processed and therefore has taken a position 
          of oppose to AB 441.

          "This bill's intention of improving public health by adding 
          voluntary guidelines to include health considerations in 
          Regional Transportation Plans are redundant and 
          unnecessary, and divert precious resources away from 
          actually implementing those improvements, such as bicycle 
          and pedestrian facilities, that would assist citizens in 
          improving their health."


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  50-23, 1/26/12
          AYES:  Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Atkins, Beall, Block, 
            Blumenfield, Bonilla, Bradford, Brownley, Buchanan, 
            Butler, Charles Calderon, Campos, Carter, Cedillo, 
            Chesbro, Dickinson, Eng, Feuer, Fong, Fuentes, Furutani, 
            Gatto, Gordon, Hall, Hayashi, Roger Hernández, Hill, 
            Huber, Hueso, Huffman, Lara, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, 
            Mendoza, Mitchell, Monning, Pan, Perea, V. Manuel Pérez, 
            Portantino, Skinner, Solorio, Swanson, Torres, 
            Wieckowski, Williams, Yamada, John A. Pérez
          NOES:  Achadjian, Bill Berryhill, Conway, Cook, Donnelly, 
            Fletcher, Beth Gaines, Garrick, Grove, Hagman, Jeffries, 
            Jones, Knight, Logue, Mansoor, Miller, Morrell, Nestande, 
            Nielsen, Olsen, Silva, Valadao, Wagner
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Davis, Galgiani, Gorell, Halderman, 
            Harkey, Norby, Smyth

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AB 441
                                                                Page 
          5



          JJA:n  6/26/12   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****






































                                                           CONTINUED