BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 452 Page 1 Date of Hearing: May 11, 2011 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Felipe Fuentes, Chair AB 452 (Ma) - As Amended: April 25, 2011 Policy Committee: Public SafetyVote: 7-0 Judiciary 9-0 Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: Yes Reimbursable: No SUMMARY This bill expands the misdemeanor offense of using an electronic tracking device on a non-consenting party to include use of a third party to employ the device. This bill also: 1)Provides for numerous exemptions, including law enforcement, legal guardians, authorized and commercial service providers. 2)Makes it a misdemeanor to require or compel another person to undergo subcutaneous implantation of an electronic tracking device. FISCAL EFFECT 1)Negligible state cost. 2)Unknown, likely minor, non-state-reimbursable local costs, offset to a degree by increased fine revenue, to the extent anyone is prosecuted for third party electronic tracking. COMMENTS Rationale . The author and sponsor, the L.A. City Attorney, contend this bill updates the code to protect privacy. According to the L.A. City Attorney, "Prosecutors are now encountering problems applying some of California's current Penal Code sections to conduct that is presently endangering and harming our community. AB 452 works to criminalize the abuse of technology, while permitting those who choose to use it to locate friends, family members and others, to lawfully do so." AB 452 Page 2 Analysis Prepared by : Geoff Long / APPR. / (916) 319-2081