BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 471
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 2, 2011

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION
                               Bonnie Lowenthal, Chair
                   AB 471 (Lowenthal) - As Amended:  April 25, 2011
           
          SUBJECT  :  High-Speed Rail Authority:  Inspector General

           SUMMARY :  Creates an independent Inspector General to oversee 
          the High-Speed Rail Authority (Authority).  Specifically,  this 
          bill  :  

          1)Requires the Governor to appoint the Inspector General for a 
            six-year term, to be subject to Senate confirmation.  

          2)Directs the Inspector General to review the Authority's 
            policies and procedures and conduct audits of the Authority's 
            activities.  

          3)Requires the Inspector General to report quarterly on the 
            Authority's expenses for travel, meals, membership fees, 
            gifts, etc.  

          4)Requires the Inspector General to report annually to the 
            Governor and the Legislature a summary of his or her 
            investigations and audits.  The summary shall include, but not 
            be limited to, significant problems discovered by the 
            Inspector General, and whether recommendations the Inspector 
            General has made through audits and investigations have been 
            implemented by the Authority.  

           EXISTING LAW:  

           1)Enacts the Safe, Reliable High-Speed Passenger Train Bond Act 
            for the 21st Century to provide general obligation bonds to 
            fund the planning and construction of a high-speed passenger 
            train system and complementary improvements to other specified 
            rail systems in the state.  

          2)Establishes the Authority and charges it with the planning, 
            designing, constructing, operating, and maintaining a 
            state-of-the-art high-speed train system for California.  

          3)Grants the Authority broad powers to:









                                                                  AB 471
                                                                  Page  2

             a)   Conduct engineering and other studies related to the 
               selection and acquisition of rights-of-way and the 
               selection of a franchisee, including, but not limited to, 
               environmental impact studies, socioeconomic impact studies, 
               and financial feasibility studies.  

             b)   Evaluate alternative high-speed rail technologies, 
               systems and operators, and select an appropriate high-speed 
               rail system.  

             c)   Establish criteria for the award of a franchise.  

             d)   Accept grants, fees, and allocations from the state, 
               from political subdivisions of the state or from the 
               federal government, foreign governments, and private 
               sources. 

             e)   Select a proposed franchisee, a proposed route, and 
               proposed terminal sites.  

             f)    Enter into contracts with public and private entities.  

           
          FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown 

           COMMENTS  :  The Authority is established in state law to direct 
          the development and implementation of intercity high-speed rail 
          service.  

          The high-speed rail system that is envisioned will encompass 
          more than 800 route miles and will provide intercity travel in 
          California between the major metropolitan centers of Sacramento, 
          the San Francisco Bay Area, the Central Valley, Los Angeles, the 
          Inland Empire, Orange County, and San Diego.  The estimated cost 
          for the initial phase of the project is $43 billion and all 
          environmental, planning, and engineering work of the Authority 
          is expected to be performed by private firms under contract with 
          the Authority.  

          Within state government, the Authority is an anomaly:  

          1)It is not overseen by any Governor's cabinet-level agency;  

          2)It relies heavily on the use of consultant contracts to 
            complete its work, with minimal means of internal oversight;  








                                                                  AB 471
                                                                  Page  3


          3)It is responsible for development of the largest public works 
            project ever undertaken in California; and,

          4)It is governed by gubernatorial and legislative appointees who 
            are not required to have any prescribed qualifications; the 
            only criterion for making appointments to the Authority board 
            is that they be "geographically diverse."  

          Since voter approval of $9 billion in bond funds for high-speed 
          rail in 2008, the Authority has repeatedly come under criticism 
          for:  

          1)Relying on overly optimistic revenue forecasts based on 
            questionable ridership projections;

          2)Developing inadequate business plans and unrealistic funding 
            scenarios;  

          3)Insufficiently assessing project risk and failing to develop 
            risk management strategies; and, having weak internal 
            controls.  

          According to the author, by establishing an independent 
          inspector general for high-speed rail, AB 471 creates an 
          independent and objective means to conduct and supervise audits 
          and investigations related to the Authority, prevent and detect 
          fraud and abuse, and keep the Governor and the Legislature 
          informed about problems and deficiencies related to the 
          Authority and to the project.  The author asserts that this 
          enhanced level of oversight is merited because of the unique 
          organizational structure of the Authority, the sheer size and 
          complexity of the project, and the existing program deficiencies 
          identified to date.  

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          Planning and Conservation League

           Opposition 
           
          None on file
           








                                                                 AB 471
                                                                  Page  4


          Analysis Prepared by  :   Janet Dawson / TRANS. / (916) 319-2093