BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 475 Page 1 CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS AB 475 (Butler) As Amended June 21, 2011 Majority vote ----------------------------------------------------------------- |ASSEMBLY: |67-7 |(May 19, 2011) |SENATE: |38-0 |(August 18, | | | | | | |2011) | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Original Committee Reference: TRANS. SUMMARY : Expands the type of vehicles, to include plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs), which are qualified to use designated offstreet parking facilities. The Senate amendments : 1)Delete the requirement that electric vehicles (EVs) display a valid Department of Motor Vehicle-issued (DMV-issued) EV decal to utilize designated EV charging stalls in offstreet parking facilities and instead require that vehicles utilizing a designed EV charging stall must be connected for electric charging purposes. 2)Authorize the owner-operator of an offstreet parking facility to have a vehicle removed from an EV-designated charging stall if the vehicle is not connected for electric charging purposes. 3)Require that designated EV charging stalls in offstreet parking facilities must be signed to indicate that vehicles using the stalls must be connected for electric charging. 4)Delete the requirement that DMV issue EV decals. 5)Delete the definition of EVs, for the purpose EV charging stall use in offstreet parking facilities. 6)Make related clarifying amendments. EXISTING LAW : 1)Requires DMV to issue zero emission vehicle (ZEV) decals for the purposes of parking and refueling in designated recharging AB 475 Page 2 parking spaces. Vehicles that qualify for ZEV decals include cars, trucks, or other vehicles that do not produce tailpipe or evaporative emissions. 2)Authorizes local authorities or owners or operators of offstreet parking facilities to designate stalls strictly for vehicles that display a valid ZEV decal and prohibits vehicles without a ZEV decal from occupying or blocking ZEV-designated parking spaces. 3)Authorizes the owner or person in lawful possession of an offstreet parking facility, after notifying the police or sheriff, to remove a vehicle from a ZEV-designated stall to the nearest public garage, if a valid ZEV decal is not displayed on the vehicle. AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY , this bill was substantially similar to the version passed by the Senate. FISCAL EFFECT : According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee: 1)Minor, absorbable one-time costs to DMV to design, produce, and distribute EV decals to holders of existing ZEV stickers, about 800 of which currently exist. 2)Minor, ongoing costs to DMV, in the range of no more than $1,000 a year, to distribute EV stickers to owners of new EVs, fully covered by fee revenue (Motor Vehicle Account). These costs and revenues could become more significant should PHEV sales increase dramatically, thereby requiring distribution of a greater number of EV stickers. DMV reports, however, that its conversations with automobile industry representatives lead it to believe that PHEV sales will be fairly modest for the next five years, at least. COMMENTS : By introducing this bill, the author intends to make current ZEV-designated stalls in offstreet parking facilities accessible to PHEVs so that drivers of PHEVs can utilize available charging facilities. By providing PHEVs with increased access to charging facilities, the author hopes to increase vehicle miles traveled using electricity, which would decrease dependency on fossil fuels and help California meet its requirements. AB 475 Page 3 Historically, EVs have been strictly electric, meaning that electricity alone is used to power the vehicle. These vehicles use batteries that are charged when plugged into an electricity power source. Since electricity is the sole power source for strictly electric vehicles, owners have a heightened awareness regarding access to charging facilities. In fact, the term "range anxiety" refers to a strictly electric vehicle owner's fear of not being able to recharge, having the battery run down, and being stranded. As strictly EVs became more prevalent in the 1990s, there was an interest in providing greater access to EV charging facilities to reduce "range anxiety." AB 1314 (Havice), Chapter 640, Statutes of 2002, sponsored by the California Public Parking Association, was introduced to facilitate the establishment of designated charging stations in parking garages. AB 1314 (Havice) authorized public and private parking garages to designate stalls for the exclusive use of ZEVs that qualified for a DMV-issued ZEV parking decal. AB 1314 (Havice), also authorized parking enforcement provisions that allowed for removal of unauthorized vehicles from ZEV-designated stalls. PHEVs were developed to address "range anxiety" experienced by strictly electric vehicle owners by providing an alternate power source. PHEVs use electricity as the primary source of power but have a gasoline-powered combustion engine that acts as a back-up in the event there is insufficient battery charge to complete a trip. The Chevrolet Volt is the first PHEV to come to the marketplace. Because PHEVs utilize a combustion engine which, when employed, results in the production of tailpipe emissions, they do not meet the strict definition of a ZEV, as provided in AB 1314 (Havice). As a result, PHEVs do not qualify as a ZEV and cannot be issued a ZEV decal by DMV or utilize ZEV-designated parking stalls. It is unclear how many ZEV-designated stalls exist in public and private parking garages, however, the DMV notes that only 807 ZEV decals have been issued statewide. The California League of Cities (League) notes that generally, ZEV-designated parking stalls are underutilized in the majority of city-owned garages noting that antiquated or inoperable charging facilities could be a contributing factor to such low usage. AB 475 Page 4 Supporters of this bill note that promoting the use of PHEVs will ultimately help California meet its air quality goals and reduce overall dependence on fossil fuels. Supporters also suggest that if drivers of PHEVs are provided with convenient access to parking and charging facilities, the number of miles driven using combustion engines will be reduced thereby encouraging future purchases of PHEV or, preferably, strictly electric vehicles. One EV group expressed concern that allowing PHEVs to access ZEV-designated stalls, could "edge out" strictly electric vehicles since it is likely that PHEVs will significantly outnumber strictly electric vehicles in the foreseeable future. This group noted that strictly electric vehicles have a greater need to access charging facilities due to inherent range limitations and, if access to charging facilities is uncertain, strictly electric vehicle owners will likely opt to use standard, gasoline powered combustion engine vehicles to complete required trips, resulting in increased emissions and reduced consumer confidence in strictly electric vehicles. It could be argued, however, that the influx of PHEVs into the marketplace could help to drive installation of additional charging stations, which would result in an overall increase in charging opportunities for strictly electric vehicles. The greater attention to the need for installing additional charging stations is already evidenced by recent state and federal government grant programs designed to expand the electric vehicle charging infrastructure. Previous legislation : AB 1314 (Havice), Chapter 640, Statutes of 2002, allowed local authorities and parking garage operators to designate spaces for the exclusive use of ZEVs and authorized the towing of vehicles and levying of fines for violations of such parking restrictions. Analysis Prepared by : Victoria Alvarez / TRANS. / (916) 319- 2093 FN: 0001607 AB 475 Page 5