BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 499
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 499 (Atkins)
          As Introduced February 15, 2011
          Majority vote 

           HEALTH              13-5        JUDICIARY           7-2         
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Monning, Ammiano, Atkins, |Ayes:|Feuer, Atkins, Dickinson, |
          |     |Bonilla, Eng, Gordon,     |     |Huber, Huffman, Monning,  |
          |     |Hayashi,                  |     |Wieckowski                |
          |     |Roger Hernández, Bonnie   |     |                          |
          |     |Lowenthal, Mitchell, Pan, |     |                          |
          |     |Silva, Williams           |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Logue, Garrick, Mansoor,  |Nays:|Wagner, Jones             |
          |     |Nestande, Knight          |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Permits a minor who is 12 years of age or older to 
          consent to medical care related to the prevention of a sexually 
          transmitted disease.  Makes a technical, conforming change to 
          existing law.

           EXISTING LAW  permits a minor who is 12 years of age or older and 
          who may have come into contact with an infectious, contagious, 
          or communicable disease to consent to medical care related to 
          the diagnosis or treatment of the disease, if the disease or 
          condition is one that is required by law or regulation adopted 
          pursuant to law to be reported to the local health officer, or 
          is a related sexually transmitted disease (STD), as may be 
          determined by the State Director of Health Services (now the 
          State Public Health Officer).

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  None

           COMMENTS  :  According to the author, there is a gap in the law 
          relative to prevention of STDs because existing law only 
          specifies the ability of minors to consent to diagnosis and 
          treatment.  The author states that the omission of consent for 
          preventative services creates a barrier to time-critical 
          preventive services.  The author asserts that at the time the 
          existing law was passed, the preventive options we have today 








                                                                  AB 499
                                                                  Page  2


          did not exist and there are now time-critical prevention 
          services for diseases that are sexually transmitted, such as 
          prophylactic post-exposure HIV medications (which must be given 
          within 72 hours of exposure) and the human papillomavirus (HPV) 
          vaccine (which, if given before exposure, can significantly 
          reduce the risk of certain cancers and abnormal, precancerous 
          cervical cell changes and genital warts).  The author states 
          that these diseases can be life-long and are only treatable, not 
          curable.  The author further states that while physicians 
          encourage their minor patients to involve parents, in the past 
          the Legislature has recognized, by enacting minor consent laws, 
          that involvement is not always practical and what is paramount 
          is that teens receive timely, necessary medical care.  The 
          author states that this bill is needed since some adolescents, 
          from difficult family situations, will either delay or simply 
          fail to obtain services if confronted with a legal requirement 
          of parental consent. 

          According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
          (CDC), compared to older adults, sexually-active adolescents 15 
          to 19 years of age and young adults 20 to 24 years of age are at 
          higher risk for acquiring STDs for a combination of behavioral, 
          biological, and cultural reasons.  For some STDs, such as 
          chlamydia, adolescent women may have a physiologically increased 
          susceptibility to infection due to increased cervical ectopy 
          (the condition when certain cells are present on the outer 
          surface of the cervix).  The higher prevalence of STDs among 
          adolescents may also reflect multiple barriers to accessing 
          quality STD prevention services, including lack of insurance or 
          other ability to pay, lack of transportation, discomfort with 
          facilities and services designed for adults, and concerns about 
          confidentiality.  Estimates suggest that while representing 25% 
          of the sexually experienced population, 15- to 24-year-olds 
          acquire nearly half of all new STDs.  According to a July 2010 
          report of the California Adolescent Sexual Health Work Group, in 
          2008 there were 517 California children ages 10 through 17 who 
          were infected with HIV/AIDS, 18,901 who were infected with 
          chlamydia, 2,581 who were infected with gonorrhea, and 22 who 
          were infected with syphilis.  While adolescent rates are lower 
          than young adult rates, these cases are of great concern to 
          public health officials because chlamydia and gonorrhea are the 
          leading causes of preventable infertility in California, 
          affecting all women, but particularly women who are just 
          entering their reproductive years.








                                                                  AB 499
                                                                  Page  3



          According to a 2008 report by the California Cancer Registry 
          (CCR), cervical cancer is the eleventh most frequently diagnosed 
          cancer among California women, with approximately 1,500 cases, 
          including 400 deaths, per year.  CCR reports that cervical 
          cancer incidence has declined 29% in California since 1988.  
          However, Hispanic women are more than twice as likely to be 
          diagnosed with cervical cancer as non-Hispanic women.  Hispanic 
          and non-Hispanic black women are also more likely to die from 
          cervical cancer than non-Hispanic white and Asian/Pacific 
          Islander women.  Nearly all cervical cancer is caused by HPV 
          infection, with two types of HPV accounting for approximately 
          70% of cervical cancer.  HPV also causes 90% of anal cancers; 
          40% of vulvar, vaginal, and penile cancers; and, smaller 
          proportions of oral and throat cancers. 

          In 2006, the federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved 
          Gardasil, a quadrivalent vaccine (prevents four types of HPV) 
          manufactured by Merck, for use in females nine through 26 years 
          of age.  The vaccine is injected as three separate doses; the 
          second dose should be administered two months after the first 
          dose and the third dose six months after the first dose.  The 
          cost of a three-dose vaccination is estimated at $468, including 
          the cost of administration, for those covered by private 
          insurance.  In October 2009, the FDA approved Cervarix, a 
          vaccine that prevents two types of HPV by GlaxoSmithKline, for 
          use in females 10 through 25 years of age.  Non-vaccine 
          strategies to prevent HPV infection include the use of physical 
          barriers, such as condoms, reducing the number of sexual 
          partners, and abstinence from sexual contact.  

          According to a 2007 article in the journal Disease Markers, 
          adolescents who are sexually active have the highest rates of 
          prevalent and incident HPV infection rates, with over 50 to 80% 
          having infections within two to three years of initiating 
          intercourse.  According to the article, most infections are 
          transient in nature and will clear.  However, a small number of 
          adolescents will not clear the infection, and persistence of HPV 
          is strongly linked to the development of invasive cancer.  The 
          author stated that association between age of first intercourse 
          and invasive cancer cannot be ignored.  Consequently, initiating 
          screening at appropriate times in this group is essential.  In 
          addition, HPV vaccination prior to the onset of sexual activity 
          is critical since most infections occur within a short time 








                                                                  AB 499
                                                                  Page  4


          frame post initiation.

           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Melanie Moreno / HEALTH / (916) 
          319-2097 

                                                                FN: 0000370