BILL ANALYSIS Ó ------------------------------------------------------------ |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 510| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |1020 N Street, Suite 524 | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ------------------------------------------------------------ THIRD READING Bill No: AB 510 Author: Bonnie Lowenthal (D) Amended: 6/15/12 in Senate Vote: 27-Urgency SENATE HEALTH COMMITTEE : 9-0, 4/11/12 AYES: Hernandez, Harman, Alquist, Anderson, Blakeslee, De León, DeSaulnier, Rubio, Wolk SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : Senate Rule 28.8 ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 75-0, 1/26/12 (Consent) - See last page for vote SUBJECT : Radiation control: health facilities and clinics: records SOURCE : California Hospital Association DIGEST : This bill makes technical and clarifying changes to existing reporting requirements for facilities using computed tomography X-ray systems when a patient receives excessive or unnecessary doses of radiation. ANALYSIS : Existing law: 1. Establishes the Radiation Control Law and the goal of effectively regulating sources of ionizing radiation for the protection of public health. CONTINUED AB 510 Page 2 2. Establishes the Radiologic Health Branch within the Department of Public Health (DPH) in order to administer a radiation control program. 3. Requires DPH to license devices or equipment utilizing radioactive materials, and persons who operate these devices. 4. Requires, commencing July 1, 2012, a person that operates a computed tomography (CT) X-ray system for human use to record the dose of radiation on every CT study produced during a CT examination if the CT system is capable of displaying the dose. 5. Requires, commencing July 1, 2013, facilities that furnish CT services to be accredited by an organization that is approved by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, an accrediting agency approved by the Medical Board of California, or DPH. 6. Requires a facility to report to DPH an event in which the administration of radiation results in any of the following, except events that result from patient movement or interference: A. Repeating of a CT examination, unless otherwise ordered by a physician or radiologist, if three specified dose values are exceeded; B. CT X-ray irradiation of a body part other than that intended by the ordering physician or a radiologist if one of three specified dose values are exceeded; C. CT or therapeutic exposure that results in unanticipated permanent functional damage to an organ or a physiological system, hair loss, or erythema, as determined by a qualified physician; D. A CT or therapeutic dose to an embryo or fetus that is greater than a specified dose value, that is a result of radiation to a known pregnant individual unless the dose to the embryo or fetus was specifically approved, in advance, by a qualifying CONTINUED AB 510 Page 3 physician; E. Therapeutic ionizing irradiation of the wrong individual or wrong treatment site; or F. The total dose from therapeutic ionizing radiation delivered differs from the prescribed dose by 20% or more, unless the radiation was used for palliative care, in which case the radiation oncologist is required to notify the referring physician if the dose was exceeded. 7. Requires a facility, no later than five business days after the discovery of an event, to provide notification of the event to DPH and the referring physician, and, no later than 15 business days after the discovery of an event, to provide written notification to the person subject to the event. This bill: 1. Limits the requirement that the dose of radiation be recorded on every CT study to only "diagnostic" CT studies, and specifically excludes CT studies used for therapeutic radiation treatment planning or delivery. 2. Clarifies that the definition of "CT X-ray system," for purposes of the requirement that the X-ray systems record the dose of radiation, is the same as the definition under existing federal regulations, as specified. 3. Clarifies that facilities are required to report when a CT X-ray examination is repeated if any one of three types of dose values are exceeded, rather than when all three are exceeded. 4. Clarifies that facilities are required to report when a CT X-ray exceeded certain specified doses, and "did not include" the intended area of the body, rather than when the X-ray irradiated a body part "other than that intended." 5. Excludes from the requirement that facilities report CONTINUED AB 510 Page 4 therapeutic ionizing irradiation of the wrong treatment site instances in which adjacent body parts are irradiated during the same treatment, unless they exceed specified values. 6. Extends the deadline for a facility to report non-therapeutic irradiation adverse events to DPH and the referring physician from no later than five business days after discovery of the event to no later than 10 business days after discovery of an event. 7. Clarifies that it is the CT X-ray systems that have to be accredited by July 1, 2013, rather than the facilities that furnish the X-ray systems. 8. Allows for the accreditation of a CT X-ray system to be included as part of a single accreditation survey, so long as that survey includes the CT service, and clarifies that systems that are used for therapeutic radiation treatment planning or delivery, calculating attenuation coefficients for nuclear medicine studies, or those that are dedicated for image guidance for interventional radiological procedures are not required to be accredited. 9. Makes a technical, clarifying change to the CT X-ray system accreditation requirement, by specifying that a medical physicist is only required to annually verify the accuracy of a CT X-ray system's displayed dose until the accreditation requirement takes effect on July 1, 2013. Also clarifies that if the X-ray system is already accredited, the verification by the medical physicist is not required. 10.Makes other minor technical and clarifying changes to existing requirements for the reporting of events related to the administration of CT X-ray radiation and therapeutic radiation that are scheduled to take effect on July 1, 2012. Background SB 1237 (Padilla), Chapter 521, Statutes of 2010, established new requirements for hospitals and clinics that CONTINUED AB 510 Page 5 use CT systems in response to concerns of over radiation. Comments According to the Senate Health Committee analysis, the bill's author argued that Californians were at increasing risk of radiation overdoses, and cited statistics that total exposure to ionizing radiation has nearly doubled over the past two decades, in large part because of increased use of CT scans for medical diagnostic and treatment purposes. The bill's author cited problems at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in 2009, in which 206 patients were exposed to overdoses of radiation over an 18-month period. The bill's author stated that patients were exposed to roughly eight times the recommended level of radiation when a scanner used for brain scans was reconfigured. FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: Yes SUPPORT : (Verified 6/25/12) California Hospital Association (source) AFSCME, AFL-CIO California Radiological Society ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : The California Hospital Association (CHA) is the sponsor of this bill, and writes in support that questions have risen as a result of the interpretation and anticipated implementation of SB 1237. CHA states that this bill is intended to address these questions and provide clarity to the affected facilities. CHA states that this bill will clarify that certain requirements apply to CT exams that are for diagnostic purposes only, and that certain types of reports are only required if an exam is done on parts of the body not intended to be scanned. According to CHA, this bill will prevent unnecessary reporting while focusing on the critical reporting requirements of excessive radiation exposure that can put a patient at risk. The California Radiological Society writes in support that CONTINUED AB 510 Page 6 this bill will provide necessary clarification for the implementation of SB 1237 and is consistent with the policies underlying the passage of that bill. ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 75-0, 1/26/12 AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Atkins, Beall, Bill Berryhill, Block, Blumenfield, Bonilla, Bradford, Brownley, Buchanan, Butler, Charles Calderon, Campos, Carter, Cedillo, Chesbro, Conway, Cook, Dickinson, Donnelly, Eng, Feuer, Fletcher, Fong, Fuentes, Furutani, Beth Gaines, Galgiani, Garrick, Gatto, Gordon, Grove, Hagman, Hall, Hayashi, Roger Hernández, Hill, Huber, Hueso, Huffman, Jeffries, Jones, Knight, Lara, Logue, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, Mansoor, Mendoza, Miller, Mitchell, Monning, Morrell, Nestande, Nielsen, Norby, Olsen, Pan, Perea, V. Manuel Pérez, Portantino, Silva, Skinner, Solorio, Swanson, Torres, Valadao, Wagner, Wieckowski, Williams, Yamada, John A. Pérez NO VOTE RECORDED: Davis, Gorell, Halderman, Harkey, Smyth CTW:k 6/26/12 Senate Floor Analyses SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE **** END **** CONTINUED