BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 516 Page 1 CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS AB 516 (V. Manuel Pérez) As Amended July 14, 2011 Majority vote ----------------------------------------------------------------- |ASSEMBLY: |57-20|(June 2, 2011) |SENATE: |26-13|(August 18, | | | | | | |2011) | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Original Committee Reference: TRANS. SUMMARY : Modifies the Safe Routes to School (SR2S) program to result in increased participation from socio-economically disadvantaged schools and communities. The Senate amendments no longer allow school districts to apply and receive SR2S grants. EXISTING LAW : 1)Provides two separate and distinct SR2S programs-one federally funded and one state funded. The federal program provides grants for infrastructure and non-infrastructure projects (e.g., education and enforcement). The state program provides grants only for infrastructure projects. (This bill modifies the evaluation criteria for state SR2S grants; hence, any further reference to the "SR2S" program will be to the state program.) 2)Establishes Caltrans as the multi-modal department responsible for the statewide mobility of people, goods, and services. Requires Caltrans to administer an SR2S program for construction of bicycle and pedestrian safety and traffic calming projects. 3)Requires Caltrans to award grants to local governmental agencies on a statewide, competitive basis using various factors as specified. 4)Encourages Caltrans to coordinate with law enforcement agencies' community policy efforts in establishing and maintaining the SR2S program. 5)Exempts SR2S grants from traditional transportation AB 516 Page 2 distribution formulae, commonly referred to as the north-south split and county shares. FISCAL EFFECT : According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, minor absorbable costs to Caltrans. AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY , this bill was substantially similar to the version passed by the Senate. COMMENTS : The goal of both the federal and state SR2S programs administered by Caltrans is to increase the number of children that walk or bicycle to school by funding projects that remove barriers that prevent or discourage them from doing so. In 1999, California was the first state in the country to legislate its own state SR2S program with dedicated funding (from the State Highway Account) on the premise that encouraging more children to walk and bicycle to school would result in healthier children, improved air quality, reduced fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, and less traffic congestion near schools. The state SR2S program was funded at $24.25 million in the latest annual cycle (October 2010) and funds are distributed on a statewide, competitive basis. Typical projects in these programs include installing curbs, sidewalks, traffic signals, crosswalks, warning signs, and bicycle paths. According to guidelines that govern Caltrans' administration of the SR2S: 6)An applicant for SR2S grants must be an incorporated city or a county within California. 7)SR2S funds are apportioned to each of 12 Caltrans districts on a student enrollment basis, except that three rural, low-student enrollment districts receive $1 million each for each two-year cycle. Those districts are: Caltrans District 1 (Eureka), Caltrans District 2 (Redding), and Caltrans District 9 (Bishop). 8)The maximum amount of SR2S funds allocated to any single project is $900,000 and the maximum reimbursement rate allowed for each project is 90%, with the remaining 10% to be matched in local dollars. If the total project cost exceeds $1 million, the applicant must fund the balance of the project with other funds. AB 516 Page 3 9)Applicants are advised, but not prohibited, from submitting more than three project applications. Proposals are rated by Caltrans staff on the various factors as specified in law related to need, potential to reduce injuries and fatalities, and other safety factors. This bill modifies and expands the list of factors that Caltrans considers when evaluating SR2S proposals. The revisions to the rating factors are intended to result in increased participation from socio-economically disadvantaged schools and communities. To date, the SR2S program has been hugely successful, with applications exceeding available funds by a ratio of about 6:1. Further, many perceive the program's outcomes as being equally successful in encouraging children to be more physically active and SR2S is considered a critical program in the fight against childhood obesity. With this in mind, to help ensure California's SR2S grants target low-income schools and communities, Caltrans was directed by the prior administration to review and analyze SR2S funding practices to assess participation of low-socioeconomic status schools and communities. A primary reason for this emphasis is that the epidemic of childhood obesity is especially prevalent in low-income communities where 30% of children and youth are overweight. Accordingly, Caltrans commissioned its Technical Assistance Resource Center (TARC) to determine the level of participation in the program by low-income schools historically and to recommend strategies for increasing those levels going forward. TARC is a joint project effort between the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) and the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF). The results of TARC's research indicate that low-income schools (defined in the study as having 75% or more of students eligible for school meal subsidies) received more state and federal SR2S grants than schools in middle or high income categories with less than 75% of students eligible for school meal subsidies. The TARC research further indicates that while it "does not conclusively explain why the poorest schools get more grants, analysis indicates that it is not because they submit more applications. TARC also studied what other states and programs have done to increase participation of low-income schools. While several different strategies have been employed by other states; none have been in place long enough to evaluate for their AB 516 Page 4 effectiveness. The most promising strategies for increasing participation may be providing continuous support for Caltrans Districts since they are responsible for prioritizing local applications, and maintaining funding to CDPH/UCSF for TARC, which will provide ongoing targeted outreach and technical assistance to low-income schools and communities." The TARC study recommends that a program goal be established by at least 5% to increase the number of low-income schools that participate in the state and federal SR2S programs. The study indicates that "This goal is modest but provides a clear and positive statement of intent. The goal can be met through a collaborative Caltrans-TARC effort that includes enhanced community involvement, additional technical assistance and training, and continued emphasis on environmental justice. TARC is confident that these steps will continue to improve the reach of federal and state SR2S programs into low-income schools and communities and ensure the most at-risk children will benefit from these valuable programs." According to the author, "thousands of child pedestrians are hit each year due to limited school zone parameters and excessive speed near schools. Disadvantaged and rural communities lack infrastructure to keep kids safe. While SR2S has been a popular and effective program in ensuring school children are safe walking to and from school, it is unclear whether it targets communities most in need." Further, numerous entities indicate their support of this bill that would help promote greater inclusion of community voices in the development of the proposals as well as safeguarding disadvantaged communities by ensuring their predominant health and safety concerns are met. Despite the purported merits of this bill, some may question the need for advocacy on behalf of disadvantaged communities especially as schools in those areas are receiving their proportionate share of SR2S grants, according to the TARC study. Also, some may believe that by requiring Caltrans to include "benefit to low-income school" as a scoring criterion, the application screening and rating process may be skewed away from a focus on quality. Thus, while a mandate to award extra ratings points to applications submitted on behalf of low-income schools would likely result in an immediate increase in grant awards to these communities, it may not necessarily lead to quality construction of projects with long-term increases in AB 516 Page 5 walking and bicycling rates as well as improvements in traffic safety. Analysis Prepared by : Ed Imai / TRANS. / (916) 319-2093 FN: 0001723