BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 523
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   January 19, 2012

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                   AB 523 (Valadao) - As Amended:  January 4, 2012 

          Policy Committee:                              Natural 
          ResourcesVote:5-4
                        Transportation                        14-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program: 
          No     Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          This bill prohibits, effective July 1, 2013, corn-based ethanol 
          from receiving funding from the Alternative and Renewable Fuel 
          and Vehicle Technology Program (ARFVT Program). 

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          Negligible state costs, if any.

           COMMENTS  

           1)Rationale.   The author contends that corn-based ethanol 
            increases food prices and harms California industry, such as 
            agricultural livestock, that rely on corn as an input while 
            providing little or no environmental benefit and reducing 
            incentives to develop other alternative fuels.  The author 
            therefore concludes it inappropriate for state money to 
            subsidize production of corn-based ethanol.  
             
           2)Background.   In 2007, the Legislature enacted the California 
            Alternative and Renewable Fuel, Vehicle Technology, Clean Air, 
            and Carbon Reduction Act of 2007 (AB 118, Núñez, Chapter 50). 
            The act created two new programs-the ARFVT Program, to be 
            administered by the California Energy Commission (CEC), and 
            the Air Quality Improvement Program, to be administered by the 
            Air Resources Board. The programs are funded primarily by 
            increases in various vehicle, vessel, and other air 
            quality-related fees that are projected to raise upwards of 
            $150 million annually for each of eight years. 
             








                                                                 AB 523
                                                                  Page  2

             The act identifies the primary goals of the ARFVT Program as 
            development and commercialization of technologies for 
            renewable and nonpetroleum fuels that help to achieve the 
            state's climate change goals. The act states that the program 
            is not to prefer any particular vehicle or fuel technology. 
            Rather, the program is to provide financial incentives, such 
            as grants, loans, and loan guarantees for specified types of 
            projects that meet specified criteria, including furtherance 
            of a number of air quality and other environmental and energy 
            goals. The act also requires CEC to adopt an ARFVT Program 
            investment plan and to update the plan annually.

            In implementing the ARFVT Program, CEC established the 
            California Ethanol Producers Incentive Program (CEPIP) to 
            financially assist California producers of lower-carbon 
            content ethanol fuels.  Under CEPIP, CEC makes payments to 
            California ethanol producers facing difficult market 
            conditions. Such producers agree to repay the money when 
            market conditions improve, reduce the carbon intensity of the 
            fuel they produce, or displace an amount of their feedstock 
            with waste-based materials. 

            The CEC acknowledges potential harm associated with corn-based 
            ethanol resulting from land use changes, commodity price 
            increases and greater water use, and indicates it intends to 
            make no more AB 118 awards to corn-based ethanol producers 
            beyond CEPIP, which statute makes inoperative on July 1, 2013.

           3)Support.   This bill is supported by numerous California-based 
            agricultural interests, including many in the livestock 
            industry.

           4)Opposition.   At the time this analysis was written, there was 
            no formal opposition registered to the latest version of the 
            bill.  However, an earlier version of this bill, which would 
            have ended CEPIP prior to the statutory inoperative date of 
            July 1, 2013, was heard by the Transportation Committee in May 
            of 2011 and was opposed by a number of ethanol producers and 
            related industrial groups, as well as several major labor 
            organizations.  It is unknown whether these groups have 
            removed their opposition to the latest version of the bill.

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Jay Dickenson / APPR. / (916) 319-2081 










                                                                  AB 523
                                                                  Page  3