BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 574
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 4, 2011

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

               AB 574 (Bonnie Lowenthal) - As Amended:  March 23, 2011 

          Policy Committee:                              HealthVote:19-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program: 
          No     Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          This bill deletes outdated provisions authorizing the Program of 
          All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) as a Medicaid 
          demonstration project and authorizes the Department of Health 
          Care Services (DHCS) to contract with up to 10 additional PACE 
          programs to provide comprehensive community-based care to the 
          frail elderly.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)It is unknown how many and when additional PACE programs will 
            apply to contract with DHCS.  It is unlikely that any costs 
            would be realized immediately, as there are currently only 
            five programs in the state, and several applications in 
            process. The following costs would occur in future years, 
            assuming 10 new PACE programs apply to contract with DHCS and 
            operate in the state:

             a)   Potential future administrative cost pressure to DHCS of 
               up to $200,000 ($100,000 GF) to review applications for new 
               PACE programs and monitor ongoing contracts.   

             b)   Potential future staffing costs of up to $90,000 
               (special fund) annually to the Department of Public Health 
               for facility licensure.

          1)Potential for future Medi-Cal cost savings, or increased 
            Medi-Cal costs, to the extent enrollment in PACE is expanded 
            in the state.  The cost impacts would depend on the likelihood 
            that PACE enrollees would otherwise enter nursing homes.

           COMMENTS  








                                                                  AB 574
                                                                  Page  2


           1)Rationale  . According to the author, the purpose of this bill 
            is to establish the long-term implementation of the PACE model 
            in California by increasing the limit on providers from 10 to 
            20.  The author states this bill is also intended to modernize 
            the statutes relative to the PACE programs by deleting 
            outdated references to its prior status as a federal 
            demonstration program.

           2)PACE  .  PACE programs are a comprehensive, community-based 
            model of care for frail, chronically ill older adults whose 
            significant functional and cognitive impairments make them 
            nursing home-eligible.   The first PACE program, On Lok, which 
            was started in the Chinatown section of San Francisco in 1971, 
            eventually evolved into a nationally recognized and replicated 
            model of integrated care and services.  PACE programs receive 
            a capitated (per member per month) payment from Medicare and 
            Medicaid, and are fully at risk for all inpatient, outpatient, 
            and nursing home care that a PACE enrollee requires.  PACE 
            programs also provide other support services such as adult day 
            care, meals, home care, transportation, and social services.

            There are currently 75 PACE programs operating in the country, 
            and the state DHCS currently contracts with five PACE programs 
            throughout the state.  DHCS reports that five additional 
            organizations in California are in various stages of 
            development of new PACE programs. 

           3)The impact of PACE on Medi-Cal costs  . The impact of PACE on 
            Medi-Cal costs is unclear.   Federal regulations require that 
            monthly Medicaid capitation payments to PACE must be less than 
            what otherwise would have been paid under the Medicaid state 
            plan if the participants were not enrolled in PACE.  This 
            requirement has been interpreted as payments that don't exceed 
            the cost of a nursing home level of care, and the capitated 
            rates paid to PACE programs have been set as a proportion of 
            nursing home rates.  However, no firm evidence exists about 
            the proportion of PACE participants who would immediately 
            enter nursing homes in the absence of PACE.  

            A study commissioned by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid 
            Services on the effects of PACE on Medicare and Medicaid 
            expenditures indicates that enrollees in PACE were associated 
            with higher Medicaid expenditures than similar enrollees in 
            other Medicaid home and community-based services waiver 








                                                                  AB 574
                                                                  Page  3

            programs, but  experienced lower expenditures than if they 
            were enrolled in a nursing home.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Lisa Murawski / APPR. / (916) 319-2081