BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                      



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   AB 574|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 574
          Author:   Lowenthal (D), et al
          Amended:  8/15/11 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE HEALTH COMMITTEE  :  9-0, 07/06/11
          AYES:  Hernandez, Strickland, Alquist, Anderson, Blakeslee, 
            De León, DeSaulnier, Rubio, Wolk

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  9-0, 08/25/11
          AYES:  Kehoe, Walters, Alquist, Emmerson, Lieu, Pavley, 
            Price, Runner, Steinberg

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR :  79-0, 05/31/11 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly

           SOURCE  :     CalPACE


           DIGEST  :    The bill increases the maximum number of 
          allowable contracts between the Department of Health Care 
          Services (DHCS) and the Program for All-Inclusive Care for 
          the Elderly (PACE) from 10 programs to 15 programs, and 
          updates statute to reflect PACE's status change from a 
          demonstration project to a state optional benefit.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law:

            1.  Establishes the Medicare program under the federal 
              Social Security Act of 1965, which provides for health 
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AB 574
                                                                Page 
          2

              care services to qualified older or disabled 
              individuals.

            2.  Establishes the Medi-Cal program, under the DHCS, to 
              provide comprehensive health benefits to low-income 
              children, their parents or caretaker relatives, 
              pregnant women, elderly, blind or disabled persons, 
              nursing home residents, and refugees who meet specified 
              eligibility criteria.

            3.  Establishes the PACE demonstration projects, which 
              combine resources from both the Medicaid and Medicare 
              programs to provide a comprehensive medical/social 
              service delivery system using an interdisciplinary team 
              approach, in centers that provide and coordinates all 
              needed preventive, primary, acute and long-term care 
              services.  

            4.  Authorizes 10 PACE demonstration projects within 
              specific geographical boundaries within California to 
              develop risk-based, capitated long-term care pilot 
              programs, and prescribes that those services are an 
              optional Medi-Cal benefit.

            5.  Requires DHCS to establish Medi-Cal capitation rates 
              to be paid to each PACE organization that are no less 
              than 90 percent of the Fee-For-Service (FFS) equivalent 
              cost, including the department's administrative cost. 

            6.  Establishes that PACE contracts are established on a 
              nonbid basis and are exempt from the Public Contract 
              Code.

            7.  Establishes DHCS Office of Long-Term Care as the 
              oversight entity for PACE programs in California, and 
              outlines the administration and regulation of the 
              programs.

            8.  Allows DHCS and, as applicable, the California 
              Department of Aging and the State Department of Social 
              Services, to grant exemptions from duplicative, 
              conflicting, or inconsistent requirements to PACE.

            9.  Also permits DHCS to grant exemptions on a statewide 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AB 574
                                                                Page 
          3

              basis as appropriate, or to a PACE organization on an 
              organization-wide basis, in instances where an 
              exemption for a single license is expanded to other 
              locations.

            10. Prohibits the federal requirements of the PACE model, 
              as provided under federal law, from being waived or 
              modified. 

            11. Allows DHCS to immediately suspend or revoke an 
              exemption if it determines that a PACE program granted 
              an exemption is operating in a manner contrary to the 
              terms and conditions of the exemption.

          This bill:

          1.Increases the number of separate contracts DHCS may enter 
            into with PACE organizations from 10 to 15.

          2.Requires DHCS to establish PACE, and removes language 
            authorizing the PACE program as a demonstration project. 

          3.Revises legislative findings regarding the PACE program 
            to cite the insufficiency of existing services to meet 
            the needs of frail elderly persons at risk of 
            institutionalization, to state that capitated 
            "risk-based" financing provides an alternative to 
            traditional FFS payment, and to cite the federal and 
            state history of the establishment of On Lok as a 
            cost-effective Medicare and Medicaid demonstration 
            program.

          4.Makes other technical and conforming changes.

           Background
           
          The PACE program is modeled after the acute and long-term 
          care services of On Lok Senior Health Services in San 
          Francisco.  The dual recognition by Medicare and Medi-Cal 
          allows integration of comprehensive services, including 
          acute and long-term care services.  PACE offers and manages 
          all the medical, social and rehabilitative service needs of 
          enrollees to preserve or restore independence, to allow 
          them to remain in their homes and communities, and to 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AB 574
                                                                Page 
          4

          maintain their quality of life.  The PACE service package 
          must include all Medicare and Medicaid services provided by 
          the state.  In addition, PACE organizations provide any 
          service determined necessary by an interdisciplinary team. 

          Minimum services that must be provided in PACE centers 
          include primary care services, social services, restorative 
          therapies, personal care and supportive services, 
          nutritional counseling, recreational therapy, and meals.  
          Services are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, and 
          365 days a year.  Generally, these services are provided in 
          an adult day health center setting, but may also include 
          in-home and other referral services that enrollees may 
          need.  This includes such services as medical specialists, 
          laboratory and other diagnostic services, and nursing home 
          care.  Participants must be at least 55 years old, live in 
          the PACE service area, and be certified as eligible for 
          nursing home care.  Enrollment in PACE is voluntary.  

          PACE receives a fixed monthly payment per enrollee from 
          Medicare and Medicaid.  The amounts are the same during the 
          contract year, regardless of the services an enrollee may 
          need.  Persons enrolled in PACE may also have to pay a 
          monthly premium, depending on their eligibility for 
          Medicare and Medicaid.  This is unlike any other managed 
          care plan in California.  Also unlike any other Medi-Cal 
          managed care plan, PACE plans are authorized to accept 
          full-risk capitation without obtaining a Knox-Keene license 
          from the Department of Managed Health Care.  

          California currently has five PACE organizations operating 
          in in Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento, San Francisco, San 
          Jose, and San Diego as follows:

           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |PACE Organizations    |Counties Served          |Number  of |
          |                      |                         |Participant|
          |                      |                         |s          |
          |----------------------+-------------------------+-----------|
          |On Lok Lifeways       |San Francisco, Alameda,  |1,010      |
          |                      |Santa Clara              |           |
          |----------------------+-------------------------+-----------|
          |AltaMed Senior Buena  |Los Angeles              |673        |
          |Care                  |                         |           |

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AB 574
                                                                Page 
          5

          |----------------------+-------------------------+-----------|
          |Sutter Senior Care    |Sacramento, Yolo         |212        |
          |----------------------+-------------------------+-----------|
          |Center for Elders     |Alameda, Contra Costa    |436        |
          |Independence          |                         |           |
          |----------------------+-------------------------+-----------|
          |St. Paul's Community  |San Diego                |105        |
          |Eldercare             |                         |           |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
           Current law includes out-dated references to PACE as a 
          federal demonstration project.  The Balanced Budget Act of 
          1997 made the PACE model a permanent provider under 
          Medicare and a state option under Medicaid.  The author 
          states that AB 574 will modernize the PACE statute while 
          retaining the program model and standards.

          The Assembly Committee on Aging and Long-Term Care 
          conducted an oversight hearing of the PACE program in May 
          2010.  According to the background material, the majority 
          of PACE participants are eligible for both Medi-Cal and 
          Medicare.  However, a significant number of PACE 
          participants are Medi-Cal-only beneficiaries. For example, 
          14 percent of PACE participants served by the Center for 
          Elders Independence are only eligible for Medi-Cal and 22 
          percent of PACE participants are Medi-Cal-only at AltaMed 
          in Los Angeles.

           Seniors and persons with disabilities in Medi-Cal 

           In November of 2010, California received approval from 
          Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to begin a 
          mandatory enrollment of approximately 600,000 seniors and 
          persons with disabilities into Medi-Cal managed care plans 
          as part of a comprehensive Section 1115 Medicaid waiver, 
          entitled "Bridge to Reform."  Enrollees who do not select a 
          plan are enrolled by default based a numerical algorithm or 
          past provider relationship.  Covered counties include all 
          of the counties with PACE Programs.  The implementing 
          legislation, SB 208 (Steinberg), Chapter 714, Statutes of 
          2010, specifically includes the PACE program as one of the 
          default choices, if available and if the enrollee is 
          eligible.


                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AB 574
                                                                Page 
          6

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes   
          Local:  No

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:

                          Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions                2011-12    2012-13    
           2013-14   Fund
           
          DHCS administration                     $100 - $200$200 - 
          $400           $200 - $400    General/*
                                                            Federal
          Potential increase or                                  
          unknown, potentially significant costs                 
          General/**
          decrease in costs to                    or cost 
          avoidanceFederal/
          transition beneficiaries                               
          Private
          to a PACE program from
          fee-for-service or 
          Medi-Cal managed care

          * 50 percent General Fund, 50 percent federal funds
          **Medi-Cal costs shared 50 percent General Fund, 50 percent 
            federal funds; Medicare funded 100 percent federal funds; 
            beneficiary premiums when appropriate.

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/25/11)

          CalPACE (source) 
          AARP
          Aging Services of California
          AltaMed Health Services Corporation
          Alzheimer's Association
          California Association of Physician Groups
          California Center for Rural Policy
          California Commission on Aging
          California Hospital Association
          Center for Elders Independence
          Hope Through Housing Foundation
          Humboldt Resource Center
          Los Angeles Jewish Home

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AB 574
                                                                Page 
          7

          On Lok Senior Health Services
          Riverside County Office on Aging
          SCAN Health Plan
          St. Paul's Senior Homes & Services

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    Supporters state that PACE has 
          been a remarkably successful program since its inception.  
          The supporters maintain that by creating a truly integrated 
          model of care and providing comprehensive medical and 
          long-term care services to individuals with dynamic health 
          issues, PACE has made it possible for more than 90 percent 
          of its participants to remain at home.  Supporters argue 
          PACE is a proven model that has been adopted by several 
          states as a key element in their continuum of long-term 
          services and support.

          Aging Services of California states that this bill 
          modernizes the PACE statute and authorizes 10 additional 
          PACE programs.  With the anticipated dramatic shifts in the 
          state's demographics and the "graying" of the state, steps 
          should be taken now to ensure appropriate capacity.  
          Supporters further argue that the authority to approve more 
          programs will allow the state to meet the needs of even 
          more frail elderly persons.  


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  79-0, 05/31/11
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Atkins, Beall, 
            Bill Berryhill, Block, Blumenfield, Bonilla, Bradford, 
            Brownley, Buchanan, Butler, Charles Calderon, Campos, 
            Carter, Cedillo, Chesbro, Conway, Cook, Davis, Dickinson, 
            Donnelly, Eng, Feuer, Fletcher, Fong, Fuentes, Furutani, 
            Beth Gaines, Galgiani, Garrick, Gatto, Gordon, Grove, 
            Hagman, Halderman, Hall, Harkey, Hayashi, Roger 
            Hernández, Hill, Huber, Hueso, Huffman, Jeffries, Jones, 
            Knight, Lara, Logue, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, Mansoor, 
            Mendoza, Miller, Mitchell, Monning, Morrell, Nestande, 
            Nielsen, Norby, Olsen, Pan, Perea, V. Manuel Pérez, 
            Portantino, Silva, Skinner, Smyth, Solorio, Swanson, 
            Torres, Valadao, Wagner, Wieckowski, Williams, Yamada, 
            John A. Pérez
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Gorell



                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AB 574
                                                                Page 
          8

          CTW:nl  8/26/11   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****








































                                                           CONTINUED