BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 644
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 18, 2011

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                  AB 644 (Blumenfield) - As Amended:  May 10, 2011 

          Policy Committee:                              Natural 
          ResourcesVote:6-3

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program: 
          No     Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          This bill requires the California Energy Commission (CEC) to 
          establish criteria to identify otherwise unusable land fit for 
          the small-scale generation of renewable electricity.  
          Specifically, this bill:

          1)Requires CEC to establish criteria for identifying a list of 
            degraded or contaminated land-such as brownfields and unused 
            agricultural land with no access to water-with a high 
            potential for use as a site for a renewable energy generation 
            facility of 50 megawatts or less.
             
          2)Directs CEC to consult with the Department of Recycling and 
            Resources Recovery, the Department of Toxic Substances Control 
            and the Department of Conservation.

          3)Directs all of these state agencies to make the best efforts 
            to work with the United States Environmental Protection Agency 
            (US EPA) pursuant to its RE-Powering America's Land: Sitting 
            Renewable Energy on Potentially Contaminated Land and Mine 
            Site Initiative.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)Minor, absorbable costs CEC to establish criteria and identify 
            lands.  (Energy Resources Program Account.)

          2)Minor, absorbable costs to other state agencies named in the 
            bill, though costs to these agencies could be more 
            substantial, possibly in the hundred thousands of dollars to 
            each agency depending upon how "best efforts" is interpreted 








                                                                  AB 644
                                                                  Page  2

            in carrying out the bill.  (Various special funds.)

           COMMENTS  

           1)Rationale.   The author intends this bill to encourage the 
            development of small-scale renewable electricity generation on 
            lands which, due to contamination or degradation, are of 
            little other use.

           2)Background.    
                
              a)   Energy Commission's Roles.   The CEC is responsible for 
               forecasting energy supply and demand, developing and 
               implementing energy conservation measures, conducting 
               energy-related research and development programs, and 
               siting major thermal power plants capable of producing 50 
               megawatts of electricity or more. Most other electricity 
               generating facilities-including many types of renewable 
               energy generating facilities, such as wind turbines and 
               nonthermal solar arrays-are permitted by local government.  

             b)   US EPA's RE-Powering America.   The US EPA initiative 
               seeks to encourage the siting of renewable energy 
               facilities on thousands of currently and formerly 
               contaminated properties and abandoned mines across the 
               country. To do so, EPA tracks approximately 490,000 sites 
               and 15 million acres of potentially contaminated properties 
               and abandoned mines.  EPA claims that these lands are 
               environmentally and economically beneficial for siting 
               renewable energy facilities because they (1) offer 
               thousands of acres of land with few site owners; (2) often 
               have critical infrastructure in place including electric 
               transmission lines, roads and water on-site, and are 
               adequately zoned for such development; (3) provide an 
               economically viable reuse for sites with significant 
               cleanup costs or low real estate development demand; (4) 
               take the stress off undeveloped lands for construction of 
               new energy facilities, preserving the land carbon sink; and 
               (5) provide job opportunities in urban and rural 
               communities.  
                 
            3)There is no formal support or opposition registered to this 
            bill.
           
           Analysis Prepared by  :    Jay Dickenson / APPR. / (916) 319-2081 








                                                                  AB 644
                                                                  Page  3